Jump to content

Arroyo agrees with DBacks.


Greg

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Arroyo's deal with Arizona: 9.5m in 2014, 9.5m 2015, 4.5m buyout on an $11m option on 2016</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">February 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So, he'll get $10 million for 3 years or $11.75 for 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Arroyo's deal with Arizona: 9.5m in 2014, 9.5m 2015, 4.5m buyout on an $11m option on 2016</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">February 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Seems like a reasonable deal for the team. If we wouldn't match or beat that, I'd be disappointed. But it's also possible Arroyo preferred the NL and and/or being in Arizona.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No problem. Now if Burnett will sign with Pittsburgh I can stop hearing about him too. Now, if we miss out on Yoon I will not be happy, but Yoon makes sense for us and to me these guys do not.

"Makes sense for us" how exactly? As another unknown coming off an unknown shoulder injury?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Arroyo's deal with Arizona: 9.5m in 2014, 9.5m 2015, 4.5m buyout on an $11m option on 2016</p>— Buster Olney (@Buster_ESPN) <a href="
">February 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So 2 yrs./$23.5 million. Team option to pay $6.5 million more for a 3rd year at age 39.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh.....adding another mediocre starter wont get us over .500 anyways.

I don't care about the .500 mark anymore. I care about playoffs. Having said that, I don't see how this team should have too much trouble going .500...we've got a great team, just needs some holes filled and everything so far has been a swing or miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the money reported by Birdland is right, I'm getting the sense that a) we weren't that seriously going after Arroyo, or 2) B'almer is starting to become a team that FAs don't really want to sign with... There are certainly a lot of factors that we won't know. But that money wasn't out of our reach or out of our minds. Par for the course at best, infuriating at worst. 200 innings down the drain...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...