Jump to content

Per Connolly: O's intensifying interest in Morales (Roch says he's hearing no)


VeveJones007

Recommended Posts

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Source: Orioles have intensified their interest in Kendrys Morales since the Jimenez signing: <a href="http://t.co/5PvFCiIn22">http://t.co/5PvFCiIn22</a></p>— Dan Connolly (@danconnollysun) <a href="

">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 399
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From Connolly's article:

Since signing right-hander Ubaldo Jimenez, the Orioles have intensified their interest in free agent designated hitter Kendrys Morales, according to a source.

The Orioles have been linked to the switch-hitting designated hitter throughout the offseason, but didn't appear to be in serious negotiations previously. That pursuit seemingly has increased in seriousness, the source said, due to two developments.

If they were to sign Morales now, the Orioles would surrender their second-rounder, roughly the 55th selection overall in 2014, which obviously is not as coveted as a first-round (or supplemental) pick.

Secondly, a shorter deal with an opt-out for Morales is potentially available for the Orioles now. Previously it was thought that the 30-year-old Morales was seeking a four- or five-year deal only, but now it appears that a two-year deal with an opt out after the first season could be in play.

One other thing that makes an opt-out contract with the Orioles logical is that if Morales were to leave the Orioles after a strong 2014 campaign, the club would undoubtedly offer him a qualifying offer. If Morales rejected it ? which he obviously would if he were choosing to opt out ? the Orioles would get a compensation pick after the first round the following year.

So essentially they would be moving up from a second-round pick in 2014 to a compensatory pick in 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, I don't want either of Morales or Cruz for more than 2 years. The more options Dan has to tweak his payroll year-to-year, the better chance we have at extending Machado, Davis, Tillman, etc.

Hopefully 2 years is all it takes but I would be ok with an option for a third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="

">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="
">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He means a .400 career average here. He definitely doesn't have 400 hits at OPACY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Kendrys Morales hit .364 with .972 OPS against AL East opponents and has 400 Career hits with 1100 OPS in Baltimore ... <a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23Orioles&src=hash">#Orioles</a></p>— JIM BOWDEN (@JimBowdenESPNxm) <a href="
">February 21, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I am sure that the caliber of pitching he was facing had as much to do with his success at OPACY then the stadium itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • No, I’m just saying Bradish can pitch one way or another.  You don’t throw out Suarez, Irvin and Povich.  at the very least, you get Bradish one of the starts.
    • As an Orioles fan I would rather that they not play on Sunday night.  Plus I really do not like the announcing crew, other than Eduardo Perez. As a fan of the sport having the Yankees-Red Sox as the spotlight game when you have two top five teams playing in a sold-out stadium the same day is a symptom of a longer-term problem MLB can’t seem to fix.  ESPN is probably right that they’d get better ratings but it is because the sport has become too regionalized with a few national brands (Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, maybe Cubs, maybe Phils, maybe Braves).  The sport’s inability to market its biggest stars nationally (especially those that don’t play for the above teams) is maddening.     Okay, I’m done venting for now.
    • Yeah no reason to get a starter. Kremer will be back soon and Suarez and Irvin have provided a lot of innings we did not expect. We need a late inning leverage guy and probably another middle relief pitcher, similar to getting Webb last year. I don't think we need to break the bank either. Everyone tosses around trading Kjerstad but we can get a late inning guy and not give up a top 25 prospect. We just a rental. Baustista will be back and we have a club option on Kimbrel if need be.
    • I'm curious for those wanting to trade for a starter: who are you kicking out?
    • would you?     https://bleacherreport.com/articles/10124411-white-sox-sp-garrett-crochets-top-landing-spots-amid-mlb-trade-rumors
    • I don’t think this matters. I think you get value where you can. The Rays have been willing trade partners in the past when it was clear they weren’t contending. Right now they are 4 games out of the last slot but have like 5 teams above them. Can they get it? Sure but it’s not that likely and in the past they’ve been realistic in their down type seasons.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...