Jump to content

How long will Buck stick with Jim Presley?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

It is interesting that hitting coaches seem to be the fall guys around baseball this year. New York, New York, Boston and Atlanta all fired their hitting coaches but retained their managers this off-season. Milwaukee, Chicago (Cubs) and Houston all fired their hitting coaches during the season.

Hitting, is down all around baseball. The take and rake stuff doesn't work as well when the rake is only flyouts. The PED era is coming to a close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is interesting that hitting coaches seem to be the fall guys around baseball this year. New York, New York, Boston and Atlanta all fired their hitting coaches but retained their managers this off-season. Milwaukee, Chicago (Cubs) and Houston all fired their hitting coaches during the season.

Scapegoats. Somebody has to be blamed.

All those teams mentioned have one thing in common, lack of post season appearance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Buck quit his job with the Yankees when the Boss told him to fire one of his coaches?

Several of him. But who knows. It may only have been his hitting coach. There are some that came around here to troll that believe that Buck should be fired so we can win the World Series.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Buck quit his job with the Yankees when the Boss told him to fire one of his coaches?

Yes, Jeter wrote about that in his first book.

Buck was told he would be allowed to return as manager, but only if he canned the whole coaching staff and brought in new guys.

Of course, Buck refused and the rest is history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there anything that a 23,223rd thread on the influence of hitting coaches can add to the debate that the first 23,222 couldn't?

At this point it's almost a matter of faith. Do players hit, or do hitting coaches hit?

So are you saying you don't think it matters at all who the hitting coach is? I would not go that far. But I don't see any compelling reason to change horses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are you saying you don't think it matters at all who the hitting coach is? I would not go that far. But I don't see any compelling reason to change horses.

There have been way too many threads on this topic and far too few actual identifiable characteristics of successful hitting coaches to think that they are a major influence. It appears the raw material is important and that a hitting coach can make a little bit of difference. Sometimes only instilling confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitting, is down all around baseball. The take and rake stuff doesn't work as well when the rake is only flyouts. The PED era is coming to a close.

I'm not sure that a downturn in home runs should influence the willingness of hitters to take a walk or work the count, but it is true that walks/game in the AL this year were the lowest in more than 100 years (since 1911). HR/game were the lowest since 1992 and OPS and runs/game were the lowest since 1976. I like the balance in the game now, but wouldn't want to see the offense go any lower than it is currently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been way too many threads on this topic and far too few actual identifiable characteristics of successful hitting coaches to think that they are a major influence. It appears the raw material is important and that a hitting coach can make a little bit of difference. Sometimes only instilling confidence.

From listening to Buck, I get this from him. The man wants to win, of course, silly, isn't it, to expect that. :)

While Buck is loyal to his people, I believe if he felt a change in coaching staff, was needed, he would make that decision in a NY minute.

Playing the game at the professional level requires talent, for sure, but there is also a mind game involved, and I believe the coaches can help with the mind and the mechanics, but at the end of the day, they are not actually out there on the diamond playing the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that a downturn in home runs should influence the willingness of hitters to take a walk or work the count, but it is true that walks/game in the AL this year were the lowest in more than 100 years (since 1911). HR/game were the lowest since 1992 and OPS and runs/game were the lowest since 1976. I like the balance in the game now, but wouldn't want to see the offense go any lower than it is currently.
They say that walks and homers go up and down together. Is that factual?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...