Jump to content

Will 2015 Dictate The Rest of Matt Wieters' Career?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It is a "thing" when a player is about to go into a contract year coming off a major surgery. An extension would have made sense for both parties.

Please find me one example in the history of baseball where this has happened.

And no, a one year-extension would not have made sense for Wieters. It is all downside with almost no upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never said he wasn't good. Said he isn't worth nearly the payday he is about to get (assuming he plays this year and shows he is capable).

Sorry, but, when you say most rater Oriole ever, most people are going to draw the line to conclusion, you think he isn't any good.

Granted, you have explained your feelings, and most will agree that he isn't worth big money contract to resign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never said he wasn't good. Said he isn't worth nearly the payday he is about to get (assuming he plays this year and shows he is capable).

How can you assume he plays this year and shows he is capable and thus is going to got a huge payday while also arguing that he should have signed a one year extension? It isn't logical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but, when you say most rater Oriole ever, most people are going to draw the line to conclusion, you think he isn't any good.

Granted, you have explained your feelings, and most will agree that he isn't worth big money contract to resign.

Thanks man:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, how dare the fifth pick in the draft only make 3 all-star teams and win two Gold Gloves in his first five full years. Why couldn't he be more like Matt Hobgood? OVERRATED. I wish he was more like Caleb Joseph and held Bowie's franchise record for games played.

By WAR (and really any other reasonable measure) Wieters is 9th among fifth overall picks in the 50 years of the MLB draft. A full third didn't ever reach the Majors.

Good point. Career WAR of recent O's picks:

Gausman 0.7

Bundy 0.1

Matusz 2.3

Britton 3.0

Wieters 13.6

Manny 10.4

Hard to imagine anyone on this list getting close to Wieters before their walk year except Manny and maybe Gausman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can you assume he plays this year and shows he is capable and thus is going to got a huge payday while also arguing that he should have signed a one year extension. It isn't logical.

Because that is a HUGE risk is about to take. What if he doesn't bounce back immediately? The Orioles have basically already acknowledged he doesn't hit enough to be a DH, he must be a catcher....so that can't be good for his value....

Could everything work out for him and he get a big payday next year? Sure. But a lot has to go right. I personally would have preferred to have another year to prove myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. Career WAR of recent O's picks:

Gausman 0.7

Bundy 0.1

Matusz 2.3

Britton 3.0

Wieters 13.6

Manny 10.4

Hard to imagine anyone on this list getting close to Wieters before their walk year except Manny and maybe Gausman.

I am no expert on WAR, but that is as a catcher, correct? With a good arm, correct?

A long-term deal assumes he will remain at catcher...and likely that will not occur.

WAR is great and all, but perspective is important too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am no expert on WAR, but that is as a catcher, correct? With a good arm, correct?

A long-term deal assumes he will remain at catcher...and likely that will not occur.

WAR is great and all, but perspective is important too.

If he signs a long term deal and doesn't stay at catcher, complain about it then. To assume that he is done as a catcher AND that some team will pay him as if he isn't is way too speculative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am no expert on WAR, but that is as a catcher, correct? With a good arm, correct?

A long-term deal assumes he will remain at catcher...and likely that will not occur.

WAR is great and all, but perspective is important too.

I am just reacting to the "most overrated Oriole ever" comment. Presumably you were talking about his reputation going back to his status as a top prospect. At which point he was still a catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because that is a HUGE risk is about to take. What if he doesn't bounce back immediately? The Orioles have basically already acknowledged he doesn't hit enough to be a DH, he must be a catcher....so that can't be good for his value....

Could everything work out for him and he get a big payday next year? Sure. But a lot has to go right. I personally would have preferred to have another year to prove myself.

Where is the risk? If he is lousy or doesn't get the long-term deal he thinks he deserves then he can still get a one-year deal this coming off-season. Signing a one year deal now if he turns out to be lousy is neutral for the Orioles and neutral for him, maybe he makes an additional million dollars or two more than he would make as a free agent coming off a lousy season. Signing a one year deal now if he turns out to be his old self is great for the Orioles and terrible for him. There is no upside on his part.

Still waiting on one example in the history of baseball where a player has signed a one year extension when he was a year away from free agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where is the risk? If he is lousy or doesn't get the long-term deal he thinks he deserves then he can still get a one-year deal this coming off-season. Signing a one year deal now if he turns out to be lousy is neutral for the Orioles and neutral for him, maybe he makes an additional million dollars or two more than he would make as a free agent coming off a lousy season. Signing a one year deal now if he turns out to be his old self is great for the Orioles and terrible for him. There is no upside on his part.

Still waiting on one example in the history of baseball where a player has signed a one year extension when he was a year away from free agency.

I see your point. I would just hope MW would show some sense of gratitude to Buck for helping with his development. But I guess I am being na?ve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Great sequence in the 10th where Mateo singled, driving in Westburg, stole 2nd and went to 3rd on the overthrow.  Then Mateo scored on a wild pitch.  I've joined the Mateo fan club, at least as a utility player.  Having Mateo on base has to drive pitchers crazy.
    • As someone that was all for DFA’ing McKenna for Hicks last week, I really can’t fault him for tonight.   I’m impressed he stole the base. He sort of had to run there with two outs. He stole it. He just came off the bag. That happens.  The route may have not been the best because he was going to his left and as a RH thrower he was just trying to position himself to throw home. He doesn’t have Vlad Sr’s arm out there. That’s a .01% chance play there.  Our CF depth is pretty thin. I think the only way we DFA McKenna is if Hicks comes here. Kjerstad will be the one to go for Hays. Remember last August when at full strength/healthy Mullins, and only a 26 man roster, we rolled with a 4 man bench of McCann, Hicks, Mateo, Urias/Frazier/Westburg.  Oddly, we’re deep enough into the season, and CF depth is thin, that I’d say there’s a 50/50 shot McKenna doesn’t clear waivers. I don’t know we have the luxury of CF depth to DFA him w/o Hicks in the mix. 
    • I think they will DFA him. They already did it once. And the fact nobody claimed him means you’re probably right about not starting for other teams. 
    • I had fun watching the extra innings of this game. That was good TV. Thanks Craig for serving up the evening’s entertainment!
    • Additionally, you can hover over the user name you want to ignore and a box pops up. The last button on the right at the bottom is the ignore button, click that and check all three boxes and you're done. Source: I'm a professional ignorer.
    • We have threads asking for Kremer, Grayson, and Povich in the closer role. Can we acknowledge that Cano is the pretty obvious next man up if Kimbrel is removed at some point? I don’t really care about his 9th inning splits. He’s our best reliever and until he gets a chance and fails I’m going to assume that’s just noise and he’ll do the best job. Tonight makes nine straight appearances with either a Save or Hold. Overall he has held a lead 10 times in 11 chances, and the one miss was a bad outing but still nearly a SV if not for Gunnar’s walk-off throwing error. 
    • McKenna was finally beginning to grow on me after years of my derision. He's done a few good things offensively. But I think he wouldn't  start for another team in the American League. I would DFA him(they won't) and bring up Hays in LF, Cowser in CF for a while, and Santander in RF. I still think if they give Kjerstad enough at bats, and not just coming off the bench as a PH, he will hit and hit for power....I dont like him getting 4 at bats a week... I think he needs to play. Mullins needs to sit for a few games.He simply cant track the ball all of a sudden.Its almost hard to watch. Maybe he's hurting.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...