Jump to content

Orioles trade away two international bonus slots for Astros LHP Chris Lee


Crazysilver03

Recommended Posts

Probably correct and very depressing.

Still, DD couldn't do better than this? Are those picks really worth so little?

I don't understand.

They are not picks. They are allotments of money that can be spent on international players.

As for value, when teams can completely blow their budgets if they are willing to pay the penalties it limits how many teams are in the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So the same list, from Feb 2014, that had the lost in the rule V draft Delino DeShields JR listed as a "super-lock" had this guy listed as a "lock".

Pretty impressive.

The Astro's problem is that they can't keep all their prospects. The 40 man is stuffed. This is a win win for them. Especially since they saved all that first round draft money for this fiscal year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Astro's problem is that they can't keep all their prospects. The 40 man is stuffed. This is a win win for them. Especially since they saved all that first round draft money for this fiscal year.

They don't need to move him until the Rule V draft at the earliest. I am sure they love getting something for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not picks. They are allotments of money that can be spent on international players.

As for value, when teams can completely blow their budgets if they are willing to pay the penalties it limits how many teams are in the market.

Let me be clear. I would love for the Orioles to start buying the high impact 16 year olds. I would. They won't so I am ok with a young 6'5 lefty with an "electric" arm to play with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are not picks. They are allotments of money that can be spent on international players.

As for value, when teams can completely blow their budgets if they are willing to pay the penalties it limits how many teams are in the market.

And some teams do not want to pay the penalties for the players they are already going to sign. So the allotment has slight value to them. There are plenty of other sellers at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floor

Without knowing enough about his full repertoire, it's hard to know what his floor might be. Looking at his one grainy delivery video, I'm inclined to think he's got a chance of injury down the road (what pitcher doesn't, Coleman?), but I also think he could stick as a reliever with the pitches he has now. A left-handed specialist isn't what you're looking for in the fourth round, but I'm sure the Astros would take it.

Ceiling

If he fills out, adds a little velocity to his fastball, he's a solid mid-rotation guy. He's got the frame to pitch some innings if he stays healthy and adds more starting pitching depth to the Astros system.

http://www.crawfishboxes.com/2011/6/8/2212866/mlb-draft-2011-astros-draftee-profile-christopher-lee-lhp-santa-fe

Mike Wright was 94 and Chris Lee was 126. In that draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10.6 H/9 this year, 9.3 career H/9. Career 1.52 WHIP. That's not good.

You are right. He's not good this year. He's also 22. No one says a thing about him being good. He just replaces Tarpley in the organization pretty effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never seen an organization so casually part ways with supplemental draft picks and International slots as the Os seem to do.

Is this a common thing other teams do and I just haven't noticed?

It's common if you don't spend millions on 16 year old Dominicans. Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...