Jump to content

The Mariners are the only team in the AL with a longer pennant drought than the Orioles


TINSTAAPP

Recommended Posts

If you're 35 years or younger, you will have no memory of watching an Orioles team play in the World Series. Only three players on the current roster were even alive (Hardy, DOD, Pearce) at the time. Cal Ripken was the same age Manny Machado is right now. It's amazing how people aren't more cynical about this team. We are easily one of the five most tortured fan bases in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
It's amazing how people aren't more cynical about this team. We are easily one of the five most tortured fan bases in baseball.

Have you been reading the board? People are pretty cynical.

I'm not exactly confident that we'll make a run at the playoffs but this is better than the garbage we put up with pre-2012.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, come on. This is just trying to wallow.

Toronto hasn't made the play-offs since 1993. We've made it 4 times since then.

Tampa has been to the World Series one time in their 17 year history and they lost 4-1.

Cleveland hasn't won a world series since 1948.

The White Sox have been to one world series since 1959.

Kansas City hadn't reached the play-offs since 1985 until they went to the series last year.

My point isn't to disparage any of these teams. My point is that you're slicing things to make them look worse than they are and you know it. We have the best record in the AL from 2012 - today. Things aren't awful so stop trying to make them appear that way.

Or we can all whine and cry about it. You know how Adam Jones feels about that. If you don't, read Roch's game summary.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Adam is fantastic. I wish the team had assets to trade to help build around him. I'd like to see him and Manny with a strong supporting cast for the next three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're 35 years or younger, you will have no memory of watching an Orioles team play in the World Series. Only three players on the current roster were even alive (Hardy, DOD, Pearce) at the time. Cal Ripken was the same age Manny Machado is right now. It's amazing how people aren't more cynical about this team. We are easily one of the five most tortured fan bases in baseball.

So, cynicism normally gets you the things you want in life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, come on. This is just trying to wallow.

Toronto hasn't made the play-offs since 1993. We've made it 4 times since then.

Tampa has been to the World Series one time in their 17 year history and they lost 4-1.

Cleveland hasn't won a world series since 1948.

The White Sox have been to one world series since 1959.

Kansas City hadn't reached the play-offs since 1985 until they went to the series last year.

My point isn't to disparage any of these teams. My point is that you're slicing things to make them look worse than they are and you know it. We have the best record in the AL from 2012 - today. Things aren't awful so stop trying to make them appear that way.

Or we can all whine and cry about it. You know how Adam Jones feels about that. If you don't, read Roch's game summary.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

The Red Sox won 0 championships between 1919 and 2003.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're 35 years or younger, you will have no memory of watching an Orioles team play in the World Series. Only three players on the current roster were even alive (Hardy, DOD, Pearce) at the time. Cal Ripken was the same age Manny Machado is right now. It's amazing how people aren't more cynical about this team. We are easily one of the five most tortured fan bases in baseball.

Indians, Cubs, Padres, Mariners, Rockies, Pirates, Rangers, Astros, Brewers.

Nice try, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indians, Cubs, Padres, Mariners, Rockies, Pirates, Rangers, Astros, Brewers.

Nice try, though.

The Rangers have been much better than us in recent history and so have the Indians, Astros, Cubs, and Mariners if we are going to go back 15-20 years. The Indians won division titles five out of six years from 1995 to 2001. The Astros were very good in the late 90's and early 2000's. The others on that list have been pretty bad, but even the Padres got to the WS in 1998. An argument can be made for us being in the bottom five if we are going to go back 20 years. It all depends on what you consider recent history. For me it's 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rangers have been much better than us in recent history and so have the Indians, Astros, Cubs, and Mariners if we are going to go back 15-20 years. The Indians won division titles five out of six years from 1995 to 2001. The Astros were very good in the late 90's and early 2000's. The others on that list have been pretty bad, but even the Padres got to the WS in 1998. An argument can be made for us being in the bottom five if we are going to go back 20 years. It all depends on what you consider recent history. For me it's 20 years.

The Cubs haven't won the WS since 1908. The Indians haven't won the WS since 1948. 6 of those 9 teams have never won the WS.

Saying we are one of the 5 most tortured fanbases in baseball is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being robbed of our moment last year thanks to the Kansas City baseball team was as tortuous as anything any of those teams have endured. It was literally stolen from us by a group of people who didn't deserve it and still don't deserve their success. The only thing I can think of that comes close recently is the Rangers in the '11 World Series.

The Rangers were 1 strike away from winning the WS twice. Also, Nelson Cruz had a chance to make a WS winning catch but it went about a foot over his glove.

And you're comparing our ALCS loss to the Royals last year to that? :rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cubs haven't won the WS since 1908. The Indians haven't won the WS since 1948. 6 of those 9 teams have never won the WS.

Saying we are one of the 5 most tortured fanbases in baseball is ridiculous.

It all depends on perspective. I'm 32 years old. I was 10 months old the last time we appeared in and won the WS. I will take winning consistently and having regular playoff appearances over that. And I don't see where the OP said we were one of the most tortured fan bases of all time. Our recent history has been pretty miserable. It's not debatable IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being robbed of our moment last year thanks to the Kansas City baseball team was as tortuous as anything any of those teams have endured. It was literally stolen from us by a group of people who didn't deserve it and still don't deserve their success. The only thing I can think of that comes close recently is the Rangers in the '11 World Series.

They don't deserve it how? That is a very talented ballclub in Kansas City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Red Sox won 0 championships between 1919 and 2003.

The White Sox went even longer than that (they went 88 years in between world championships, from 1917-2005.)

But in my rat's ass of an opinion, White Sox fans at-large are not whiny, narcissistic self-pityers, as are Cubs fans and as were Red Sox fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, come on. This is just trying to wallow.

Toronto hasn't made the play-offs since 1993. We've made it 4 times since then.

Tampa has been to the World Series one time in their 17 year history and they lost 4-1.

Cleveland hasn't won a world series since 1948.

The White Sox have been to one world series since 1959.

Kansas City hadn't reached the play-offs since 1985 until they went to the series last year.

My point isn't to disparage any of these teams. My point is that you're slicing things to make them look worse than they are and you know it. We have the best record in the AL from 2012 - today. Things aren't awful so stop trying to make them appear that way.

Or we can all whine and cry about it. You know how Adam Jones feels about that. If you don't, read Roch's game summary.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

At least he's not that other guy here who talks about how his life will be a failure since it looks unlikely the O's will win the Series during the roughly 60 years he has left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're 35 years or younger, you will have no memory of watching an Orioles team play in the World Series. Only three players on the current roster were even alive (Hardy, DOD, Pearce) at the time. Cal Ripken was the same age Manny Machado is right now. It's amazing how people aren't more cynical about this team. We are easily one of the five most tortured fan bases in baseball.

And how would that do any good? Being pissed to the point

your blood pressure goes up only hurts you. I have been

there before. It's not worth it.

Be thankful you are not a cubs fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • One good Bud Norris year out of Rogers would be nice.  Two would be amazing.
    • Except he really isn't hurting the team at SS.  Again, he's an 8+ WAR player this year.  I don't know why anyone would want to argue for moving him off a position where he's performing at an MVP level.  This season is already as valuable as Ripken's '83 MVP season and more valuable than any other season Ripken had except 1984 and his monster 1991 campaign. I saw Cal play at shortstop, too.  And I think when we all think of Cal at shortstop, we think of the refined version....the guy that made 3 errors in a season (and somehow lost the Gold Glove to Ozzie f'ing Guillen) and the guy that had a whole chapter dedicated to him in George Will's "Men at Work." You neglected to respond to the idea that Gunnar can get better at the position.  There's a lot to like with him defensively already, but he's not a fully finished product and I don't think anyone here is arguing that he is.  I suspect that if you took Cal in his second season and matched that up with Gunnar, you'd see some similarities.  I also suspect that Gunnar isn't the defender that he'll be in 5 or 6 years from now, just like Ripken wasn't the best defender at SS in his early seasons. Gunnar is a 5 tool player.  There's nothing that he can't do on a baseball field and I'm sure if you put him in a "traditional power position" like a corner outfield spot, he'd be just fine. But I find it funny that you want to be called old fashioned, yet here we are discussing Cal Ripken, the guy that broke the mold for what a shortstop can be and turned it into a power position.  Ripken was ultimate anti-traditionalist of the position and responsible for the slew of power hitting shortstops that came in after him.  And quite frankly, I don't know why we're talking about power when we're debating defense.
    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...