Jump to content

Would you prefer Pedro Alvarez, Chris Carter, or Mark Trumbo?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

I would think Trumbo plays left field, Davis plays in right field, Alvarez plays first base and Trumbo/Alvarez/Wieters/Reimold/Paredes alternate as DH when needed.

So much for cutting down on K's and relying less on the HR. This lineup would be fun

1.Machado 3B R

2.Alvarez 1B L

3.Jones CF R

4.Davis RF L

5.Trumbo DH R

6. MW C S

7. Schoop 2B R

8. Reimold LF R

9. Hardy SS R

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Exactly why is it so difficult for this front office to sign a guy who gets on base at least a third of the time?

We need more slap hitters and speedsters who can work a count, not more wannabe sluggers who strike out half the time they get to the plate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

per MLBTR:

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/12/pedro-alvarez-nontendered-pirates.html

Considering the fact that the still-28-year-old Alvarez (29 in February) averages a home run every 19 plate appearances versus right-handed pitching, he should draw considerable interest from American League clubs looking for a first baseman/designated hitter that can be platooned with a potent right-handed bat. Clubs like the Orioles and Indians stand out as possible fits, while the Rays and White Sox could make some sense depending on their ability to move James Loney and Adam LaRoche, respectively.

And this was written after the Trumbo signing. Would you want Alvarez too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think Trumbo plays left field, Davis plays in right field, Alvarez plays first base and Trumbo/Alvarez/Wieters/Reimold/Paredes alternate as DH when needed.

I'd love to have Alvarez on the team as our DH. But any coach or manager that allows him within fifty feet of a fielders glove would need to be put out to pasture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...