Jump to content

HR total this year for each Oriole in the projected starting lineup


markakis8

Recommended Posts

Do anyone really see Manny only hitting 23 with the progress he made last year? Hard to see Wieters with only 12 if he plays all year. I could see 21 for Trumbo on the Mariners, just hard to imagine that kind of light tower power only hitting 21 in Camden though. Schoop is on the low side, but 16 is possible.

I would put money down that we get at least 225 from our starting 9.

Yeah, baring injury I think these numbers are low for Machado, Trumbo, Schoop, and Wieters. I would add about five to each of their projected totals. Wieters really did not hit for much power when he came back last year, so he may be more of a 15-18 guy now. Schoop could hit 30. He's got easy power. Worry more about his plate discipline and BA falling off the table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's not likely, but it is possible. If the starters average 30 HR and the bench gets 7.5 each we're at 300.

If we get 50 from Davis... 35 each from Machado, Trumbo, and Alvarez... 25 each from Jones, Wieters, Schoop, and Hardy... and 15 from Kim... there's your 270. To get 30 from the bench you'll need 18 from Joseph+Reimold and 12 from Rickard+Flaherty.

I mean, it's not likely... but it's kind of crazy think about. 300 home runs cover a lot of SP flaws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not likely, but it is possible. If the starters average 30 HR and the bench gets 7.5 each we're at 300.

If we get 50 from Davis... 35 each from Machado, Trumbo, and Alvarez... 25 each from Jones, Wieters, Schoop, and Hardy... and 15 from Kim... there's your 270. To get 30 from the bench you'll need 18 from Joseph+Reimold and 12 from Rickard+Flaherty.

I mean, it's not likely... but it's kind of crazy think about. 300 home runs cover a lot of SP flaws.

Not just unlikely, not possible. I think 250 is unlikely, but possible. Variance and injuries are coming, they always do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

300?!

Do I have to be the one to joke that I don't think our pitching staff will come close to giving up that many homers?

I don't want to, but if me doing it now heads off one troll, I will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not likely, but it is possible. If the starters average 30 HR and the bench gets 7.5 each we're at 300.

If we get 50 from Davis... 35 each from Machado, Trumbo, and Alvarez... 25 each from Jones, Wieters, Schoop, and Hardy... and 15 from Kim... there's your 270. To get 30 from the bench you'll need 18 from Joseph+Reimold and 12 from Rickard+Flaherty.

I mean, it's not likely... but it's kind of crazy think about. 300 home runs cover a lot of SP flaws.

Well I wouldn't hold my breath of that happening. Sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

257 is the record, set back in 1996.

IMO, that mark is very reachable.

264. 1997 Mariners. Oriole record is 257.

264 is as far from 300 as it is from 19th place. Would be a 14% increase in the record. I think that's plausible but very unlikely.

14% increase in 61 homers is about 70. It's the difference between 50 doubles and 57 doubles. It would be bumping the old hit record from 257 to 290.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

264. 1997 Mariners. Oriole record is 257.

264 is as far from 300 as it is from 19th place. Would be a 14% increase in the record. I think that's plausible but very unlikely.

14% increase in 61 homers is about 70. It's the difference between 50 doubles and 57 doubles. It would be bumping the old hit record from 257 to 290.

162 games and 43 more home runs needed, probably not going to happen, but it wouldnt surprise me, if this team doesn't make a run at it.

157 home runs, is 1.58 a game, more within reach of this team, at least on paper, before the season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

162 games and 43 more home runs needed, probably not going to happen, but it wouldnt surprise me, if this team doesn't make a run at it.

157 home runs, is 1.58 a game, more within reach of this team, at least on paper, before the season starts.

257, that is! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...