Jump to content

Buck's statement on Kim and tonight's game


LookitsPuck

Recommended Posts

In Cal's first 85 PAs in the majors he had 11 hits, including two doubles and a homer, one walk and 15 Ks. Clearly overmatched, terrible K/BB rates, zero power. On April 27th of his rookie year Nick Markakis sported a .189/.295/.302 line. Six weeks into his rookie year Brian Roberts was slashing .263/.285/.339. Manny had two months in 2013 with OPSes that barely cleared .500.

Give it time.

Those guys weren't rule 5 picks. They're not even remotely comparable in terms of talent. And do you think that they were batting leadoff in their first 85 PA in the majors?

I'm not saying we should bench Rickard, or that Kim should start over him. I just don't think that Rickard should be such be treated as such a key player that he needs to play every day and leadoff every game. Kim is arguably more talented than Rickard and Rickard, to this point, hasn't played well enough for the "everyday leadoff hitter" treatment. What's so difficult about that? Kim should be given some opportunities to carve into Rickard's playing time. I disagree with Buck's stubbornness with the whole leadoff hitter angle, and quotes like this that indicate to me that Buck has Rickard rated as a much better player than Kim right now, to the point that starting Kim instead hurts the team's chance to win. I'm not exactly dropping hot takes here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 267
  • Created
  • Last Reply
What constitutes "play the guy"? David Lough spent nearly two seasons on the roster getting PAs at about the same rate Kim is.

Do you honestly believe that Buck's usage of Kim during spring training and the first part of the regular season, along with his comments concerning Kim, indicates he has full confidence in using Kim even as a part-time player? Do you think Kim is his choice to be on the roster, or he'd rather have someone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to watch the games more and ignore the ridiculously SSS numbers . No matter what you think of Joey's D he is much better than Kim in that regard.

I watch the games every single game every inning and still stand by my post. The Orioles immediate problem is OFFENSE, not DEFENSE. Rickard has not been good in the outfield this season and both the stats and the eye

are perfectly in sync on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An excuse me swinging bunt down the 3B line and another IF hit? Hardly owning the pitcher.

Did I say own? Where did I say that? Rickard gets an infield single and he's amazing. Kim does it and he sucks. Completely illogical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Kim and think he'll be fine, probably. But those projections have to come with wide error bars, and have to fall on the optimistic side. The limited number of players with both MLB and KBO playing time make any projections between those leagues kind of an educated guess.

Indeed they do which is why I said I know it's just a projection and could mean absolutely nothing. I was just a little surprised to see even a projection that high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you honestly believe that Buck's usage of Kim during spring training and the first part of the regular season, along with his comments concerning Kim, indicates he has full confidence in using Kim even as a part-time player? Do you think Kim is his choice to be on the roster, or he'd rather have someone else?
Rickard hasn't hit the last few games but he's having good AB, sees 4.24 P/PA and is a better fielder than Kim. He also has the fourth best OPS of the regular players. Nobody's hitting lately.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you honestly believe that Buck's usage of Kim during spring training and the first part of the regular season, along with his comments concerning Kim, indicates he has full confidence in using Kim even as a part-time player? Do you think Kim is his choice to be on the roster, or he'd rather have someone else?

I dunno. Don't care that much. If Buck were really throwing a tantrum why does Kim have any playing time?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can tell who doesn't watch the games when they refer to Kim's crappy infield singles as "heating up."

..and you can tell who sees what they want to see and decides to be willfully ignorant to anything inconvenient to their current opinion. Let's just ignore the fact that he is hitting the ball harder now and having good ABs

because that clashes with what you want to believe. The single in Texas was a laser beam and the RBI single in KC was not an infield single plus he hit a ball hard later in the game that was an out, but let's focus on the

infield hits instead. It's certainly not me that isn't watching the games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I say own? Where did I say that? Rickard gets an infield single and he's amazing. Kim does it and he sucks. Completely illogical.

I showed the other day that Rickard was near the bottom, of a long list, in exit velocity.

If anyone on the team doesn't hit the ball hard it's him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..and you can tell who sees what they want to see and decides to be willfully ignorant to anything inconvenient to their current opinion. Let's just ignore the fact that he is hitting the ball harder now and having good ABs

because that clashes with what you want to believe. The single in Texas was a laser beam and the RBI single in KC was not an infield single plus he hit a ball hard later in the game that was an out, but let's focus on the

infield hits instead. It's certainly not me that isn't watching the games.

Actually, that wasn't an out, was it. It was a hit that Kim got off the hard hit ball in the KC game, but yeah you're right. The infield singles are much more significant. You people are so biased that you can't even see

through your own BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watch the games every single game every inning and still stand by my post. The Orioles immediate problem is OFFENSE, not DEFENSE. Rickard has not been good in the outfield this season and both the stats and the eye

are perfectly in sync on that.

The stat's are meaningless at this point and you'll excuse me if I don't accept the judgment of your eye. Rickard has at least as good an arm as Kim's, is much faster and has far greater range. I don't think he gets poorer reads than Kim. With Trumbo in RF we need the best two other OF on the team and like it or not that's AJ and Joey. At the plate he see's 4.24 P/PA and has good AB. puts the ball in play. He has had a number of at'em balls lately. No reason to bench him and play Kim v LHSP.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stat's are meaningless at this point and you'll excuse me if I don't accept the judgment of your eye. Rickard has at least as good an arm as Kim's, is much faster and has far greater range. I don't think he gets poorer reads than Kim. With Trumbo in RF we need the best two other OF on the team and like it or not that's AJ and Joey. At the plate he see's 4.24 P/PA and has good AB. puts the ball in play. He has had a number of at'em balls lately. No reason to bench him and play Kim v LHSP.

Rickard has been awful in the outfield since being in the major leagues. What's Kim's P/PA? Kim doesn't have good AB's? Kim doesn't put the ball in play? He has been far less prone to striking out than Rickard. Second, who

doesn't watch the games again? Odorizzi is not a LHP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stat's are meaningless at this point and you'll excuse me if I don't accept the judgment of your eye. Rickard has at least as good an arm as Kim's, is much faster and has far greater range. I don't think he gets poorer reads than Kim. With Trumbo in RF we need the best two other OF on the team and like it or not that's AJ and Joey. At the plate he see's 4.24 P/PA and has good AB. puts the ball in play. He has had a number of at'em balls lately. No reason to bench him and play Kim v LHSP.

Also, I find it funny that you say stats are meaningless at this point, then promptly turn around and post a stat for Rickard as if it means anything. Too funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rickard has been awful in the outfield since being in the major leagues. What's Kim's P/PA? Kim doesn't have good AB's? Kim doesn't put the ball in play? He has been far less prone to striking out than Rickard. Second, who

doesn't watch the games again? Odorizzi is not a LHP.

You keep comparing Kim's AB to Joey's but his SS is miniscule in comparison. You say Joey has been awful in the OF . Can point out anything that makes Kim better? And if he is indeed awful why do you suppose Buck keeps playing him?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You keep comparing Kim's AB to Joey's but his SS is miniscule in comparison. You say Joey has been awful in the OF . Can coupons out any tithing that makes Kim better? And if he is indeed awful why do you suppose Buck keeps playing him?

Kim doesn't have the arm strength to overthrow the cut-off man.

BTW I don't think you can use coupons when tithing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...