Jump to content

PED Suspensions Coming


Sessh

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, weams said:

Marte was not using a designer drug. He was using the mass building stuff. As have many of the Dominicans. So as are many of the MLB players I have seen respond to his use, I am a bit angry that he was able to parley his chemical romance into the esteem and money and position that he did.

As you know, I loved Cruz, and he's a PED user. So it's not like I think all players that use stink all together.

I think the guys who use the stuff that masques well or easily probably have better skills than the Jay Gibbons of the world. And you know, for every one of the 800 jobs that the Horse Hormone Users take up, a kid that is close misses out. 

Well, I agree with the sentiment (and pulling on the heartstrings, you bastard) of the last paragraph.  But IMO, you still gotta hit the ball.  

I'm not sure if there's much of a difference between the designer drugs and the mass building stuff.  From what I know the goal of the PEDs is to recover from workouts faster to build more muscle quicker than you naturally could.  Designer drug or mass building, IMO, it's splitting hairs.  These guys aren't taking them for any other reasons, right?

Again, I'm not sure when Marte started using.  Has it been reported?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, I agree with the sentiment (and pulling on the heartstrings, you bastard) of the last paragraph.  But IMO, you still gotta hit the ball.  

I'm not sure if there's much of a difference between the designer drugs and the mass building stuff.  From what I know the goal of the PEDs is to recover from workouts faster to build more muscle quicker than you naturally could.  Designer drug or mass building, IMO, it's splitting hairs.  These guys aren't taking them for any other reasons, right?

Again, I'm not sure when Marte started using.  Has it been reported?

I assume that someone who will use that stuff has been using since he was 14. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Are you more upset about the fact that you thought Marte was a good dude and now he's a known cheater?  Or are you more upset that your 2nd favorite team is without a really good player for 80 games? 

Of course it's both.  The latter is a team perspective and former is a player perspective.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2017 at 8:38 PM, crawjo said:

What on earth would have prevented them from doing it? 

1) The fact that they were so talented that they probably wouldnt't need them to beat the competition, 2) The immediate and short-term side-effects, 3) The long-term side-effects

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Because Ruth and Bonds weren't talented.

Lance Armstrong was a hack.

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

Edited by CheeryO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CheeryO said:

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

What possible difference does it make how effective it would have been?  Either the intent is there to cheat or it isn't.

Ruth tried to cheat.  It didn't work and he fell ill but it doesn't take away from his intent to cheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CheeryO said:

You're such a troll.  Where did I imply that any of these guys weren't talented?

That said, even if was amazingly talented, how was Lance Armstrong not a hack?  He's the poster child for a career made by doping.

What is the source that Babe Ruth doped?  And even if he did, how effective could they have been back in his day relative to any other kitchen sink concoction any other player used?

Barry Bonds is the guy that really rides the line.  Would he have been at the league of Mantle, Aaron, Mays and Pujols had he not cheated?  I doubt it, but maybe.  ARod is another case.  He's so insecure that even if he had twice the talent of Ruth he still would have maybe doped.

Sorry forgot the other bit.

This is how it works, if you state as a premise that athletes A, B and C were so talented that they didn't need to cheat and I respond with athletes X, Y, and Z were every bit as talented and yet they cheated that is calling into question the validity of your premise.  Since their doesn't seem to be any evidence that athletes that reach a certain performance threshold are less likely to use PEDs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I used to think we had a plethora of outfielders ready to replace the current guys, but not I'm not sure. Cowser is one. Does the FO trust Stowers? Heston is another as far as his bat goes, but how bad is the defense if you have Stowers, Cowser and Heston? How long before Bradfield is ready? Will Norby or Mayo move to the OF? Does that make it any better. If Santander has his typical year, I would give him the QO. So what if you have to pay him large for one year? It's not like our payroll is high right now.  
    • Or maybe he just is hesitant because he knows it’s best to give up a single than letting it get by you for a triple or inside the park homerun. I highly doubt Cowser gives a crap about WAR. There is nothing in the guy’s demeanor, personality, or anything that suggests he chases stats and places himself above the team. To say otherwise is quite ridiculous at best, and malicious at worst. He is a rookie and he will get more comfortable as he plays. With that comfortability will come trusting his ability more and more. Why even suggest a thing like you are suggesting? Just pathetic quite frankly on your part.
    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...