Jump to content

E Santana to O's?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Why not just trade for Santana in the first place instead of trading/signing the likes of Gallardo/Miley?

Not a huge fan of Santana, but he is way better than Miley.

Should have just signed Santana from the beginning. Lowest risk. Consistent. Guys like Ubaldo and Gallardo had severe red flags and risks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have room for another middling starter making 10+ million a year.

I am sure they will after he lets Trumbo walk...(huge mistake IMO)

MW will not be here or cost the same...

Most of our payroll will be in DD's awful SP signings. Disgusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure they will after he lets Trumbo walk...(huge mistake IMO)

MW will not be here or cost the same...

Most of our payroll will be in DD's awful SP signings. Disgusting.

I know facts aren't your friend but the current starting rotation will cost approximately 30% of the payroll in 2017. Adam Jones and Chris Davis will account for approximately 25%. Hardy pushes that over 30%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Angelos is willing to pay for Ervin I would have no problem with trading for him. You could move Bundy back to bullpen and the bullpen gets a lot better with Bundy and Hunter. Problem is next year when you have 7 starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...