Jump to content

Kruk Bashes O's


markakis4pres

Recommended Posts

I was floored last night watching BBTN. I have no problem with them bashing the O's, but I you are going to bash them, please make it informed bashing. They had no clue. Sam was not the problem??? His bullpen mismanagement easily cost this team 7-10 games.:rolleyes: In the end, the team did the right thing.

That should tell you the value of most of these moron's comments. They really aren't worth watching, except to see highlights of the day's games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest rochester
I was floored last night watching BBTN. I have no problem with them bashing the O's, but I you are going to bash them, please make it informed bashing. They had no clue. Sam was not the problem??? His bullpen mismanagement easily cost this team 7-10 games.:rolleyes: In the end, the team did the right thing.

A couple of things:

Whether I agree with Kruk or not, his diatribe appeared mainly about it being personal....there is no doubt that the players on this team (generally) are prima donnas, let alone underachievers with an attitude. Seeing it from a personal point of view it must be frustrating. Then have your friend canned because of this perception is even worse.

Second, although Sam made some mistakes with his BP moves I also believe that IF the BP could do their jobs things would be a lot different. Was Sam the right guy for the position at this time? I do not think so.

Bottom line? Although I do not completely understand the love for Girardi based on one year of managing, I do like his "old school" attitude and the fact that he tells it like it is. Whether that will equal success I do not know, but it is needed, and will make things more interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I happened to catch Kruk on ESPN radio yesterday afternoon, and he was just killing the O's even worse there.

He repeatedly called their roster "junk" and said they were fools to throw that team out on the field and ask/expect Perlozzo to "make us a winner."

He ripped them hard in that segment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I happened to catch Kruk on ESPN radio yesterday afternoon, and he was just killing the O's even worse there.

He repeatedly called their roster "junk" and said they were fools to throw that team out on the field and ask/expect Perlozzo to "make us a winner."

He ripped them hard in that segment.

The "junk" was better than the Yankees for two months. And they could be right with them now if it wasn't for Perlozzo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was about to post a thread on this, ill just put it here.

Phillps and Kruk both say that they think Mazzonne will stay, and of course Davey Johnson and Girardi are the leading names being thrown around.

What I don't like is when discussing the woes of the O's, Kruk throws in "If Im a Manager out there I would take any other job before taking the job there, its the last team I would want to manage"

Steve Phillips added that the team is no where near contending and its almost entirely due to our bullpen.

This team has a lot of young talent, and even more in the farm system, I can think of many teams I would rather not manage if Im a Manager looking for a job.

Kruks a fool.

I'd be interested to see that list.

Compared to most teams, the O's do not have a lot of young talent, nor do they have a strong farm system -- by most objective analyses, it's in the bottom third of baseball.

And the organizational mess speaks for itself; unless/until it gets cleaned up, it's a major deterrent to prospective managerial candidates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is the weather in fantasyland today?

The 8 games identified in the Sun were ones that we should have won. There have been others as well. All in all I think Perlozzo cost us 8-10 games with his management. We should be right there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 8 games identified in the Sun were ones that we should have won. There have been others as well. All in all I think Perlozzo cost us 8-10 games with his management. We should be right there...
No chance he has cost us this many games.

Im not trying to defend Perlozzo here but come on, this roster is a joke. More blame should fall at the feet of the players and GMs than Sammy.

Sammy was awful and had to go but to think he is the difference between us and being in the thick of things is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ripped this team apart on Baseball Tonight. Granted, I don't think either of these guys are particularly bright. Their main points were as follows:

1) Phillips: Perlozzo not the problem, the bullpen is the problem

He is correct here, but fails to realize the lineup was the even bigger problem

2) Both: The team is horribly put together, and the blame should be on Flanagan moreso than Perlozzo.

I tend to agree here, altough Perlozzo definitely should've been fired.

3) Kruk said he talked to Perlozzo, and is convinced Mazzone will stay because he really loves the pitching staff.

Cosidering this is coming from someone bashing the O's, this is good news.

4) Kruk: He would take any managing job in baseball over the Orioles job.

5) Both: The Orioles are not only bad, they are becoming irrelevant

Kruk is an idiot and nobody would give him a managerial position, that's why he's up in the booth!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck Martinez on XM just said that Kruk was dead on. That we don't have another Markakis and everybody is in A ball.

Of course Kruk is dead on...Anyone thinking he isn't is dreaming.

That being said, his emotions make things worse and he isn't giving enough credence to the idea that Perlozzo was in over his head as a manager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also heard Phillips tell Mike and Mike that Don Baylor is actually the #2 guy on our wishlist. Anyone else hear any thing of this? And if so, what do ya'll think?

I would rather have Baylor than Baker or Manuel, but I'd rather have Trembley than Baylor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He did say Don Baylor was #2 but I think he got his initials mixed up, maybe Dusty Baker! His whole piece really ticked me off, "wouldn't touch it with a 10 ft. pole!"

Note to Steve: Organizations don't make changes when things are going beautifully, if you don't have the talent or ability to turn a once proud franchise back into a winner just say that!

Duquette followed him as the G.M. of the Mets when he was fired in mid-season 2003, so it's not like he is completely objective here either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I may be misunderstanding, but if you are suggesting that you would recall Rogers for the playoffs, then I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Baker is odd man out here, or maybe Smith, but I would definitely keep Bowman
    • A litmus test is if you'd prefer Trevor Rogers back for last guy. Tell me if it sounds crazy, but a pitcher you can sign to a minor league deal in mid-August might not be competitive with the world's greatest hitters in late September. It is fun to curate a trick pitch that works for a minute.
    • Just read two interesting tidbits - Juan Soto has battered him something like 18/35 which seemed like a lot but I guess PHI and WSN saw each other a bunch in the NL East. Also that he passed 1000 career innings.   It caught me a little by surprise he has been around that long.    Fingers crossed Bradish and Grayson in their careers can get there.    Eflin is 3rd among pitchers at age 30 and down this season. Hopping to Active Leaders to see how few pitchers attain that in this Driveline/Arm Barn era, tonight he became the 57th active pitcher to get there.     He gives us the ~162 IP we hope for in 2025, it'd go up about 20 spots.
    • Westburg, Urias, Mountcastle… Good defense, even when there’s bad defense. Westburg missed a ball that went for a hit, but I didn’t feel any foreboding, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure that that one play wouldn’t ruin the game. And it didn’t. Good pitching, even when there’s bad pitching. Eflin had never in his whole career walked 5 guys, but I wasn’t worried, for some reason. Even when Bowman had his worst outing as an oriole, I wasn’t worried, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure we’d win. And we did. Good hitting, good base running, even when Santander REALLY wanted that triple… and didn’t get it.  The fundamental baseball smarts seem to have returned, so a mistake is just a mistake. I feel really good about this team now, even though they haven’t been perfect. I really feel they’ll cover for each other, and we will enter the playoffs strong. I feel most comfortable about facing the Yankees again; they just don’t seem like a strong team, and I’m not the least bit worried about facing them again.
    • That is strong language coming from you.  The only recent guy I really couldn’t stand was Jimenez, though I sure wasn’t keen on Kimbrel for most of the season either.
    • Did you really say tonight’s game didn’t mean much? 
    • To state the obvious, the magic number for home field in the WC series is now 1, with 4 games remaining.   Would love to v close that out tomorrow va. the Yankees and then relax all weekend.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...