Jump to content

The Matt Wieters Appreciation Thread


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Maybe this is premature pending a formal announcement that Castillo has been signed, but let me take a moment to say a few things about Matt Wieters.

While Matt never met the sky-high offensive expectations that many of us had after his insane year at Frederick and Bowie in 2008, he provided a lot of great moments.    I loved the way he carried himself on the field, and the look he always had on his face after gunning down a runner or blocking a runner at the plate.    It was a look that basically said, "how dare you!"     As he grew into veteran status, he was very well respected by his teammates, especially the pitchers.   And we all know Buck adored the guy; that counts for a lot in my book.

We thought we'd be saying goodbye to Matt last offseason, but he surprised a lot of people (not everyone) and took the QO.   There was a lot of unhappiness about it at the time, but looking back, we weren't a playoff team in 2016 without Matt.   From his game winning hit on opening day, to his game winning homer against the Angels in May, to his game-tying homer against the Blue Jays in the second-to-last series of the year, to his two homers in our playoff-clinching win on the final day of the regular season, Matt provided a lot of really special moments in 2016.

We all mostly agree that it's time to move on, but I enjoyed Matt's 9 years playing in our organization (8 as a major leaguer) and I hope he has several good years left in him.   The team that signs him will be getting a class act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

There's a certain level on which I feel like the day we got Matt was the first day I really felt the team could eventually be good again.  And he contributed to making that feeling a reality, even if he never became the franchise cornerstone you could have hoped for watching him tear through the minors.  I'm glad he was on our team all these excellent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mauer with Power except it was more like Mauer without the average or on base abilities...or the power. So I guess it was Mauer without the Mauer? 

 

I posted this in the other thread too but me and Matt are the same age and came from the same small town...Goose Creek. I always liked him for the remote possibility we had interacted as children. Plus to make this wonderful story even more heart warming the manager of the local minor league affiliate was none other than Dave Trembley around that time. Justin Smoak is the same story except he is a Blue Jay so he can screw off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Maybe this is premature pending a formal announcement that Castillo has been signed, but let me take a moment to say a few things about Matt Wieters.

While Matt never met the sky-high offensive expectations that many of us had after his insane year at Frederick and Bowie in 2008, he provided a lot of great moments.    I loved the way he carried himself on the field, and the look he always had on his face after gunning down a runner or blocking a runner at the plate.    It was a look that basically said, "how dare you!"     As he grew into veteran status, he was very well respected by his teammates, especially the pitchers.   And we all know Buck adored the guy; that counts for a lot in my book.

We thought we'd be saying goodbye to Matt last offseason, but he surprised a lot of people (not everyone) and took the QO.   There was a lot of unhappiness about it at the time, but looking back, we weren't a playoff team in 2016 without Matt.   From his game winning hit on opening day, to his game winning homer against the Angels in May, to his game-tying homer against the Blue Jays in the second-to-last series of the year, to his two homers in our playoff-clinching win on the final day of the regular season, Matt provided a lot of really special moments in 2016.

We all mostly agree that it's time to move on, but I enjoyed Matt's 9 years playing in our organization (8 as a major leaguer) and I hope he has several good years left in him.   The team that signs him will be getting a class act.

Agreed. The Posey rule took away his greatest strength. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt did well here - not as well as the extremely high expectations helped set by him being a high number 1 pick and putting up great minor league numbers - but there never seemed to be doubt about his effort - and he clearly played through pain.  It's time to move on, and thank Matt for his excellent efforts and high standards of professionalism here.  Good luck in the future.      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, weams said:

Agreed. The Posey rule took away his greatest strength. 

Even after he couldn't block the plate, his reach on sweep tags gave him a big edge on most catchers.   He also rarely dropped a short-hop throw.   He was also excellent at catching foul tips, an underrated skill.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

Mauer with Power except it was more like Mauer without the average or on base abilities...or the power. So I guess it was Mauer without the Mauer? 

 

I posted this in the other thread too but me and Matt are the same age and came from the same small town...Goose Creek. I always liked him for the remote possibility we had interacted as children. Plus to make this wonderful story even more heart warming the manager of the local minor league affiliate was none other than Dave Trembley around that time. Justin Smoak is the same story except he is a Blue Jay so he can screw off. 

Three straight years of 22 or more HR is a pretty decent power number. Especially for a catcher that was rode into the ground. I was good with Wieters coming back. Good luck Matt. Hope wherever you go, the fans appreciate you more than many Orioles fans did. If Sisco doesn't pan out, many will miss what we had while we had it. And that was pretty damn good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

Three straight years of 22 or more HR is a pretty decent power number. Especially for a catcher that was rode into the ground. I was good with Wieters coming back. Good luck Matt. Hope wherever you go, the fans appreciate you more than many Orioles fans did. If Sisco doesn't pan out, many will miss what we had while we had it. And that was pretty damn good.

Oh, I liked him. I was just sorry he was a Boras guy and sorry he got hurt on us. Not his fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Gunnar is the only one you worry about. I would still sign Holliday as well but I think Gunnar is the bigger fish to fry. I no longer would consider an extension for Adley. I would wait on anyone else.
    • Something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet is something like being able to hit behind the runner to advance him.   The O's have been successful in building an analytics offense.   Focus on hitting homeruns, develop a swing to achieve optimum launch angle and exit velocity to hit the ball over the fence.  Result is they have a team of beer league software players and not baseball players and struggle to score when not hitting homeruns.   Analytically, if you review their offensive rankings for the season, it says, nothing wrong with the offense, at least from a macro review, but we all know that this offense has issues.   Runs - 4th Home runs - 3rd AVG - 7th OBP - 11th SLG - 3rd OPS - 4th  K's - 18th (this was interesting to see considering how much they seem to strikeout) All of the above looks good, nothing to fix. The O's had 6 sacrifice hits for the season, ranking 30th.  Interestingly, Arizona who led the league in runs scored also led the league in sacrifice hits with 34.   The O's do not need to necessarily to focus on small ball, but they do need to be able to add that skillset to their offensive arsenal.  
    • Sounds like Buck. Anything to get a slight advantage. It’s something this team sorely misses. 
    • Detroit has been so much fun to watch. They have Skubal and literally 11 completely interchangeable pitchers who Hinch uses at any time and in any situation. They all can start games, throw in middle relief, and close. Every Tigers pitcher has to be ready to come in at any time because nobody other than Skubal actually has a defined role, which can certainly help keep them focused.  That guy Holton who started Game 1 in Cleveland closed Game 3 yesterday.  Of course he did! And Hinch seems to have complete faith in everybody, which I guess works since they all seem to have rubber arms and never get tired. It must be so annoying as an opposing manager to try and game plan against them or to be a hitter and have absolutely no idea who you are going to be facing until you actually walk up to the plate.  Not sure how long this "gimmick" will last, but it has been really enjoyable.
    • So if Westburg ends up being a very good but not MVP level player you aren't interesting in extending him at a team friendly rate? I disagree with your strategy. If you can lock up even a young 3 win player at a team friendly rate I say do it.
    • The most obvious player to extend is Gunnar, his agent is Boras, which means most likely, he will not be interested in an extension.  All others, you have to wait and see.  Adley after that horrible second half, you really need to see if he bounces back.  Westburg, need a full season before locking him up, plus he would probably want a season to post big numbers.  Cowser, wait and see if he learns the strike zone before extending.  
    • I agree with you on Gunnar. I'd wait on Westburg until he puts up a Gunnar like season, and spend money on Burnes this offseason. Oh and do something temporary to bring the RF wall in 10-15 feet
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...