Jump to content

Is Anyone Worried About Britton


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

If memory serves, he has allowed baserunners every inning he has pitched so far, needing double plays to escape all three. Seemed to get squeezed a bit last night, even though the other pitchers were getting the low strike, and a few of the balls he has given up have been hard grounders that found a hole. Still, he also seems to be getting the ball up more than in previous years and has an ugly 2.33 WHIP. The reports of a shoulder problem have nothing to do with this, right? Nothing to worry about? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
6 minutes ago, dan-O said:

I haven't heard about any shoulder problem. Link? He had a bit of an oblique issue in ST.

I'm always worried, but I'm not too concerned yet about him. His velocity is there, and he's getting ground balls. Some have found holes so far. But clearly, his command is not what we're used to seeing. Looks like he's trying to find his release a little bit. 

I think you are right, I meant oblique. Whatever it was that they held him out early on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our team's margin of error for making the playoffs is small, so I'm only worried about Britton in the sense that we probably need him to come somewhat close to replicating last year. Not particularly worried about these first two outings. He didn't have as much spring practice as most of the pitchers, plus a few of those hits were the standard groundballs through the hole that sinkerballers are bound to give up every once in a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a good sign that "much shakier than usual" Britton has still given us three scoreless innings in high leverage situations.

I'm concerned, but not worried yet. He's still made the big pitches when he's had to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Stuff looks the same. Inconsistent command.  Not worried 

This is me. Was I worried last night? You betcha. If Britton is still struggling with his command in two weeks then maybe a little, but for now, no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...