Jump to content

Orioles Acquire Miguel Castro Designate Gunkel


weams

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

It's kind of a mystery why Castro has struck out so few batters (25 in 46 innings), with the stuff he has.     His command has gotten better and better as the year has progressed.    I feel confident whenever he takes the mound.  

Maybe he has the same issues as Chris Lee? Doesn't Lee have plus velocity, but really an inability to strike batters out?

Usually if that's the case, it's because their fastball is flat and throwing it too often in the zone.

My guess is that Castro has been living in the zone, but in the lower quadrants, so he's getting weak contact. Hitters can typically sit fastball, but aren't able to square up on it. But since they can basically guess fastball (he's only really throwing 3 pitches: a fastball, slider and a change)...probably why they're able to make contact. And he doesn't really throw his change all that often (I think something like 10% of the time or something).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Wasn't he throwing 96 yesterday?

That change up that he threw to record his last out was nasty.  85 and faded away from the lefty.   I like this guy.  Roy has the good story on his personal background, but I like the Buck said he pitches every game like it's game 7 of the World Series.  

I'm tired of watching the Miley's, Ubaldo's, Gallardo's of the world nibble.  Quite frankly, I'm tired of watching them period.  Castro has an edge to him.  I really wish we'd just go ahead and put this guy in the rotation.  Another guy that I really like is Mike Wright.  He might not be rotation material this season, but I could see him filling the "Castro role" next year.  

We can't develop pitching?  Maybe if every pitcher was as hungry as Castro they would be willing to change.  He was essentially a one pitch pitcher when he made his debut for us.  Now that's changed.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

They were just raving about him on Wall to Wall. I'm guessing penciling him in as the #5 starter next year wouldn't be jumping the gun. Chalk this one up as (another) Duquette acquisition off the scrap heap that no one will ever mention, or downplay when it is convenient.

The Castro move is lauded regularly & in many posts by those who believe Duq has done a poor job. Some praised it the moment it was made. On the other hand, trading assets that someone else acquired, for a few more wins in the present, isn't something he deserves any credit for. Ironically - the only thing ignored on the OH is the praise these moves get from those who don't think he's a good GM. Post after post suggesting something that hasn't been ignored ...will be ignored. ?

There are so many claims that the Castro move will be ignored & that limitations put on him by ownership will be ignored ...while the posts proving the opposite are ignored. 

It would be nice to let him work on his offspeed stuff in the minors before putting him in the rotation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On August 24, 2017 at 4:50 PM, sportsfan8703 said:

That change up that he threw to record his last out was nasty.  85 and faded away from the lefty.   I like this guy.  Roy has the good story on his personal background, but I like the Buck said he pitches every game like it's game 7 of the World Series.  

I'm tired of watching the Miley's, Ubaldo's, Gallardo's of the world nibble.  Quite frankly, I'm tired of watching them period.  Castro has an edge to him.  I really wish we'd just go ahead and put this guy in the rotation.  Another guy that I really like is Mike Wright.  He might not be rotation material this season, but I could see him filling the "Castro role" next year.  

We can't develop pitching?  Maybe if every pitcher was as hungry as Castro they would be willing to change.  He was essentially a one pitch pitcher when he made his debut for us.  Now that's changed.  

We developed Castro? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cumberbundy said:

We developed Castro? 

 

I'd say yes. 22. Only 240 milb innings. Remember the story about McDowell being good with sinker/slider guys.  I think he's been big for Castro. 

Castro was a one pitch pitcher. Now he's got three pitches that he'll throw consistently. Same age. More developed than Tanner Scott. 

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

Entered the game with the bases loaded and 2 outs, and the Orioles desperately clinging to a 1-run lead.

In spite of the fact that he walked 3 batters, Castro still managed to give the Orioles yet another effective outing in a close game.

 

MIGUEL ANGEL CASTRO )))))))) (vs. RED SOX, 8/27)

 

1.67 llllShutout Innings

0 l....lHits )l

3 ll....Walks

2 )llll.Strikeouts

35 lllllPitches )(16 )Strikes, )19 )Balls)

 

 

2017 ERA:lllllllllll 2.64

2017 WHIP: ..l.l.l 1.042)  48.00 IP (50 H/BB)

2017 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: ).210 )  (35 for 167)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/24/2017 at 6:35 AM, Frobby said:

It's kind of a mystery why Castro has struck out so few batters (25 in 46 innings), with the stuff he has.     His command has gotten better and better as the year has progressed.    I feel confident whenever he takes the mound.  

But again, he gets SO's when he needs them - such as coming in with the bases loaded in a one run game yesterday.  And he averaged 1 SO per inning in the minors and has 57 SO's in his 80 MLB  innings, so I don't think there's an issue with SO's.  .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Pheasants said:

He threw two strikes to his first batter and then wasted three pitches. According to the Boston announcers, two were wa-a-ay outside; none were close enough to tempt the batter.  If he'd bring those closer he might get more swings--and misses

His command was off yesterday when trying to hit the outside corner to left-hand batters.    Those pitches were frequently going very high and wide.    I don't think it was intentional.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...