Jump to content

Chris Lee Hurts His Chances


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, tntoriole said:

I agree that the current candidates had bad starts in their first games at Norfolk.  However, that does not make me a "give Ubaldo a longer leash" fan.   Let's reexamine this thread if Ubaldo goes through a similar April and May to what he had last year with 7 straight starts of not getting out of the 4th inning and an ERA of 10.    Being able to pitch in the past in the big leagues only takes you so far as Jeremy Guthrie found out yesterday.  

First, I don't want anyone to think that I'm a big Ubaldo fan.    But just like you can't write off Wright, Ynoa or Lee based on one bad AAA start, you can't write off Ubaldo based on one bad major league start.    And it's not like Wright or Ynoa have been impressive in their past major league stints, and Lee hasn't even pitched in AAA yet and only had a few starts in AA last year.    Finally, don't forget that we have to fill Tillman's slot before we even begin to worry about whether to replace Ubaldo in the rotation.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 hours ago, Frobby said:

First, I don't want anyone to think that I'm a big Ubaldo fan.    But just like you can't write off Wright, Ynoa or Lee based on one bad AAA start, you can't write off Ubaldo based on one bad major league start.    And it's not like Wright or Ynoa have been impressive in their past major league stints, and Lee hasn't even pitched in AAA yet and only had a few starts in AA last year.    Finally, don't forget that we have to fill Tillman's slot before we even begin to worry about whether to replace Ubaldo in the rotation.    

I am certainly not writing off Ubaldo after ONE bad start.  I am just saying does he get 7 horrific starts in a row like he had last year through June?  I doubt it.  I think Ubaldo does not have the protection of being owed two years of 13 million as was the case last spring, so I think him being DFAd or traded along with the compensation pick is a lot stronger possibility if he pitches as horrifically as he did last spring.    And who knows?  If they have to, maybe they go get Fister or Colby Lewis.  I hope not.  Best case is Ubaldo pitches mediocre but not horrifically.  Second best case is if Ubaldo is pitching horrifically, that somebody in the system steps up enough.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

I think an up to speed Jackson is still a bullpen piece at this point.

Probably.  Although there a lot of moving parts.   How fast does Tillman return?  How bad does Ubaldo pitch in April and May?  Are there any other injuries (God forbid), etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On April 9, 2017 at 9:31 AM, tntoriole said:

I agree that the current candidates had bad starts in their first games at Norfolk.  However, that does not make me a "give Ubaldo a longer leash" fan.   Let's reexamine this thread if Ubaldo goes through a similar April and May to what he had last year with 7 straight starts of not getting out of the 4th inning and an ERA of 10.    Being able to pitch in the past in the big leagues only takes you so far as Jeremy Guthrie found out yesterday.  

And what if Ubaldo gives us 7 consecutive starts like the ones that finished out the end of last season?:

6 IP/1 ER

6.67 IP/3 ER

9 IP/3 ER

7 IP/2 ER

7 IP/4 ER

5.33 IP/0 ER

6.67 IP/0 ER

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, LA2 said:

And what if Ubaldo gives us 7 consecutive starts like the ones that finished out the end of last season?:

6 IP/1 ER

6.67 IP/3 ER

9 IP/3 ER

7 IP/2 ER

7 IP/4 ER

5.33 IP/0 ER

6.67 IP/0 ER

 

Then obviously no change needs to be made.  But the point I was trying to make is that leaving Ubaldo that long in the rotation when he was horrific probably cost us the AL East, or at least not having us the playoff at home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Then obviously no change needs to be made.  But the point I was trying to make is that leaving Ubaldo that long in the rotation when he was horrific probably cost us the AL East, or at least not having us the playoff at home. 

But the way he pitched the last month and half of the season was one of the main reasons we did, in fact, get into the playoffs. We hit well in Toronto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LA2 said:

And what if Ubaldo gives us 7 consecutive starts like the ones that finished out the end of last season?:

6 IP/1 ER

6.67 IP/3 ER

9 IP/3 ER

7 IP/2 ER

7 IP/4 ER

5.33 IP/0 ER

6.67 IP/0 ER

 

Does it really matter how well he pitched into the final stretch when he carried a 7.00 ERA INTO AUGUST? I'm not willing to boot Ubaldo after two bad starts, but if we get into May and he's below replacement level??? Time to cut the chord. It's important to remember that over the last six years Ubaldo has basically ranged from barely passable to truly terrible. Anybody thinking he has upside is delusional. The Ubaldo we paid for was gone long before he arrived in Baltimore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better outing for Lee today: 5 IP, 5 H, 1 R, 3 BB, 5 K's.     All of his outs other than the K's were on the ground, including two DP's.    He won't be starting in Toronto, but I'm glad he made progress.   

He also only threw 77 pitches in 5 innings, 46 for strikes.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...