Jump to content

O's trade for Hellickson


OriolesMagic83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

o

 

61% of the outs that Hellickson recorded (11 out of 18) came via the Groundout and the Strikeout.

 

18 OUTS: ) 6 Groundouts (Including 1 Double Play), 4 Strikeouts, 4 Lineouts, 2 Flyouts, 1 Caught Stealing

 

JEREMROBERHELLCKSON )))))) (vs. DEVIL RAYS, 9/23) 

IP:ll6

H:llll )) (1 Home Run, 3 Singles)

R:llll 3

BB:ll1

SO:ll4

Pitches: )l  90 )(58 )Strikes, )32 )Balls)

2017 ERA: )l 6.97

2017 WHIP: )l 1.277 )  51.67 Innings  (66 H/BB)

2017 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: l) .243 )  (49 for 202)

 

PITCHES BY INNING

*******************

10 ll(71 llStrikes, ll3 lllBalls)

11 lll(81 llStrikes, lllllBalls)

25 lll(17 llStrikes, llllllBalls)

11 lll(71 llStrikes, lllllBalls)

21 lll(14 llStrikes, lllllBalls)

12 lll(51 llStrikes, llllllBalls)

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

He made one bad pitch.    Otherwise, he pitched very well.   

Out of how many starts? He wasn't ever going to move the needle. Definitely a back of the rotation guy going forward. I actually thought he might have something left, but his command has to be spot on because his stuff is below average except for the change up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Out of how many starts? He wasn't ever going to move the needle. Definitely a back of the rotation guy going forward. I actually thought he might have something left, but his command has to be spot on because his stuff is below average except for the change up. 

I was just talking about his outing tonight.   I was at the game, and thought he had a very good night, except the one pitch to Duda.    I wasn't commenting on his overall performance for us (poor), or the wisdom of the trade (meh, i don't think we'll miss Cleavinger, and it was worth a shot even though the best we could have hoped for was a 4.5ish ERA).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

This is not even close to the Davies for Parra trade.    Everyone knew that was bad.    We had a chance at the time and Cleavinger is a lefty setup guy as a ceiling who was getting hammered in AA at age 23 and has continued to stink at AA for the Phils.    Not much of an asset for someone who had the ability to put a good stretch together and help us make the playoffs.   Didn't work out.   No big deal.

I would be interested in Hellickson on a one year deal next year.   I would stay away from him or any of the other guys who require 3/30 type of contracts.

 

I agree that it's not nearly as bad as Davies for Parra.  

I think plenty of people knew this deal was bad too when it happened, I know I did, and I surely wasn't the only one.  

25 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

A beautiful thread straight out of a nightmare.

Yes, we gave up future assets to acquire Jeremy Hellickson.

I think it's also important to keep it in context, to put it in monatary terms, it's like a 2 million loss in value.  Hellickson worth nothing (actually negative value, but not important because the O's didn't have a realistic shot at the playoffs, something like 2% chance at the time of the trade).  Cleavinger and international slot(s) probably worth about 2 million.

In comparison, the Parra for Davies deal is at least a $50 million loss. 

It does suck to give up something (even something relatively small) for nothing, it's like when you buy an ice cream cone and you drop it on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

Fair enough.   I didn't think anything when we made the trade.   I knew it was a longshot that Hellickson would put a good stretch together but we gave up slots we wouldn't have used and Cleavinger is just an example of a very poor draft pick.

He was an ok draft pick, he was ranked ahead of Cedric Mullins and Tanner Scott by some ahead of this season.  He could still have a major league future as a LOOGY. The stuff plays vs LH batters, he just needs a little better command/control.  Over the past 2 seasons he's run a 13.4 K/9 and a 3.5 BB/9 against lefties.  Yeah, I'd prefer to draft more upside in the 3rd round, but it's not a terrible pick.

The international slots, even though the Orioles don't use them, still have value.  They are worth something to other teams, so the Orioles should make sure they get the best possible value back for them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RZNJ said:

This is not even close to the Davies for Parra trade.    Everyone knew that was bad.    We had a chance at the time and Cleavinger is a lefty setup guy as a ceiling who was getting hammered in AA at age 23 and has continued to stink at AA for the Phils.    Not much of an asset for someone who had the ability to put a good stretch together and help us make the playoffs.   Didn't work out.   No big deal.

I would be interested in Hellickson on a one year deal next year.   I would stay away from him or any of the other guys who require 3/30 type of contracts.

 

What do you see that tells you he'd be a serviceable 5th guy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • ???. Cowser took more swings against LF than any other LH hitter on the team ( not named  Henderson). He was one of the guys they did not platoon.
    • I think Kevin Seiyltzer was the fall guy for a team that thought they were a championship team.  This guy has overseen more a decade of hitting in Atlanta, has been through developing and helping young batters succeed when the league adjusts.  Most importantly, he has a ring! 
    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...