Jump to content

What's the most you'd offer any of Hardy, Jimenez, Miley, or Tillman to return?


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Shelby Miller.

In short....its how prospects get the chance to be more than prospects. Every year formerly good or respectable pitchers fall off the map. Some come back and rebound, some don't. Tillman could be either or

As you point out though. It happens all the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, TradeAngelos said:

Nope Older. Still pitching decently. Pretty far from "done" by the looks of it.

 

Dude has a 4.75 ERA in the National League. I would hardly call that still pitching decently

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TradeAngelos said:

He is still pitching in the majors, at 32 years old correct? How bad was he last year at 31?

3.81 in 2016 with SF (not horrifying but not decent in the NL)

4.96 in 2015 with the CWS

In 2014 he was good. Its not a perfect comparison but its not out of this world off base either IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no interest in bringing back Miley or Jimenez.  The best part of their contracts is that they are leaving. 

I would offer Tillman a 1 year/$3 mill contract w/ incentives and an option year.  If he bounces back it would be a cheap way to fill out the rotation.  I would offer Hardy a minor league contract.  $1 mill + incentives if he makes the majors.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TradeAngelos said:

Tillman in the 4 years preceding this season.

3.91 ERA (in AL east), 758 IP, 56-30 128 starts

It really shouldn't be that hard to find a good comp since it happens "all the time" now should it.

I'll wait,

And you will keep waiting.  I'm not going to be bothered to make an exact match for your pleasure. 

I never thought I'd see the day that someone is acting as if they were upset because the guys that are declining are younger than the player they are being comped to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TradeAngelos said:

Tillman in the 4 years preceding this season.

3.91 ERA (in AL east), 758 IP, 56-30 128 starts

It really shouldn't be that hard to find a good comp since it happens "all the time" now should it.

I'll wait,

Ok....Barry Zito was the same age as Tillman when his career went off the cliff. Zito also had a much better track record of success. 

If SF did not owe him a ton of money he would never have pitched as long as he did.

Anyone who watches baseball knows that some players age gracefully and others just fall off the proverbial cliff. One day they are a decent player then 2 years later they are that guy that people say....Hey whatever happened to (insert name). Some guys owed a ton of money cling on longer (Zito, Cliff Lee etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I could be convinced on a one year deal.

I want no part of a multi-year deal unless all the years after year one are team options.

I don't think anyone in his/her right mind would offer Tillman a multiyear deal.    I could imagine a vesting option that kicks in if he throws 160 IP or something like that.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

If the doctors cleared him.

If he says he's healthy.

If his velocity is there.

If he doesn't look like he's favoring anything.

Why should we assume he isn't healthy just because he isn't having any success?

Now could there be a mechanical flaw present that is the result of him having pitched hurt last year?  I suppose it's possible.

But I see no reason to just assume a player is injured due to poor results.

You have years of data showing he is not this pitcher.  Regression like we have seen doesn't happen overnight without some type of injury. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I write Seattle has a one-game lead in the race for the second Wild Card slot despite its current starting rotation of James Paxton, Ariel Miranda, Yovani Gallardo, Erasmo Ramirez and Marco Gonzales (10 other pitchers have made starts for the Mariners this year).

The Mariners reportedly remain in the market for pitchers and have provided a dumping ground for Erik Bedard, Miranda and Gallardo in previous trades with the Orioles.

If the Orioles placed Chris Tillman, Ubaldo Jimenez and Wade Miley on revocable waivers (if they have not already), would the O's walk away if the Mariners placed a claim on one of the struggling trio, each with an expiring contract?

If the Orioles did not revoke the waiver, the Mariners would be on the hook for the balance of the 2017 salaries of $10.05 million for Tillman, $13.5 million for Jimenez or $8.75 million (with a $500,000 buyout of a 2018 option) for Miley. Or would the Orioles try to work out a trade to get something in return? Would the O's be willing to pay down a salary to get a better prospect?

The Orioles head to Seattle for a series next week and I suspect M's general manager Jerry Dipoto is not done dealing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...