Jump to content

Is Orioles Manager Buck Showalter Too Loyal To His Players?


PressBoxOnline

Recommended Posts

Buck Showalter was asked Aug. 22 if he, perhaps, is too loyal to some of his players, and the Orioles' manager seemed put off by the question.

 

"I think you have to have a long memory here, but you also have to have a short memory sometimes," Showalter said. "I'll probably stand accused of that because I know a lot of things that other people don't know about players."

 

https://www.pressboxonline.com/2017/08/23/is-orioles-manager-buck-showalter-too-loyal-to-his-players

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course he is. And he has an incomprehensible love for Rule 5 picks.

So his defense is that he knows things other people don't know. Well of course he does. But what other people know are results. That should be what is most important to Showalter. But I guess has summoned his inner John Calipari and decided that what he really cares about is the players, not the results for the team.

His answer shows me two things about him. One is that he won't admit his mistakes(like not using Britton in the playoff game last year). The other is that he is not the right manager for the O's once they begin to bring up some of the players from the minors who could be part of the future core of the team. I can just see it now. In 2019(at the latest), when Mullins and Hays may have proven they are ready to be starters for the O's, Showalter will be keeping them on the bench because he knows what other people don't - that Rickard, Santander and an aging, re-signed Jones are the best outfield for the O's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice at the end of the article, it said Tillman will likely get another start.  How loyal can one get.  

I also find that Buck is not willing enough to try new things.  He went to 6 pitchers during a period in which everyone threw well and the team ERA fell about .40.  He went back to five without Tillman and every other game became horrible again.  Why not stick with what worked and try a different sixth pitcher.  Castro went 6 good innings in relief of Tillman and never got a look as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, panick said:

Of course he is. And he has an incomprehensible love for Rule 5 picks.

So his defense is that he knows things other people don't know. Well of course he does. But what other people know are results. That should be what is most important to Showalter. But I guess has summoned his inner John Calipari and decided that what he really cares about is the players, not the results for the team.

His answer shows me two things about him. One is that he won't admit his mistakes(like not using Britton in the playoff game last year). The other is that he is not the right manager for the O's once they begin to bring up some of the players from the minors who could be part of the future core of the team. I can just see it now. In 2019(at the latest), when Mullins and Hays may have proven they are ready to be starters for the O's, Showalter will be keeping them on the bench because he knows what other people don't - that Rickard, Santander and an aging, re-signed Jones are the best outfield for the O's.

I think Buck won't be in Baltimore after 2018. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Buck is too loyal to his players and this was an issue at his last stop as well, I believe.

We should not have signed Hardy, CDavis and some others.  I don't know if DD wanted to extend them or if Buck said he could win with them.  It's not easy to say, 'thanks for your efforts in helping us win, but we are going in another direction at your position' but it needs to be done.  We did it with Markakis, but apparently not with Hardy or Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pheasants said:

Notice at the end of the article, it said Tillman will likely get another start.  How loyal can one get.  

I also find that Buck is not willing enough to try new things.  He went to 6 pitchers during a period in which everyone threw well and the team ERA fell about .40.  He went back to five without Tillman and every other game became horrible again.  Why not stick with what worked and try a different sixth pitcher.  Castro went 6 good innings in relief of Tillman and never got a look as a starter.

The more Tillman starts the less likely we are to make another deal for a bad starter. Buck is saving us. 87 dimensional chess.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What have you done for me lately, off with their heads if they aren't producing, is the cry of the fan. If a manager were as disloyal to his individual  players as the fans are, he would soon lose the clubhouse, and his job. There are things that don't directly result in production but are important to keeping the team on the same page. And those are things we don't know about. I don't think he is loyal so much as patient. People where screaming about CD batting 4th, and after a while he hit him 7th. Just not soon enough for some. Probably too soon for Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, El Gordo said:

What have you done for me lately, off with their heads if they aren't producing, is the cry of the fan. If a manager were as disloyal to his individual  players as the fans are, he would soon lose the clubhouse, and his job. There are things that don't directly result in production but are important to keeping the team on the same page. And those are things we don't know about. I don't think he is loyal so much as patient. People where screaming about CD batting 4th, and after a while he hit him 7th. Just not soon enough for some. Probably too soon for Davis.

There is a lot of truth to this.    That said, I do think Buck has stuck with guys too long at times.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...