Jump to content

Now we need to get OVER .500

Frobby

By Frobby
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted

The O's have battled back to .500 on June 14 (32-32), June 18 (34-34), June 27 (38-38), June 29 (39-39) and August 7 (56-56), but we lost the next game each time.    We haven't spent a day over .500 since June 11.     Now's the time we gotta do it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O's are Legends Hangout Veteran Council

O's are Legends

Posted
Posted

Tillman has to get his 2nd win at some point.. right?

Hope the M's have a bad game tomorrow, they had 5 errors in the first inning and got pounded by the yanks.

Marco Gonzales is 0-1 with a 7.4 era in 4 starts with the M's since being acquired from the Cards, he has yet to get into the 5th inning with the M's. O's bats will need to continue that trend for Marco, hope Tillman has a decent start in him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
El Gordo Hangout Grand Counsel

El Gordo

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Frobby said:

The O's have battled back to .500 on June 14 (32-32), June 18 (34-34), June 27 (38-38), June 29 (39-39) and August 7 (56-56), but we lost the next game each time.    We haven't spent a day over .500 since June 11.     Now's the time we gotta do it!

Trouble is Ubaldo pitches the next game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TonySoprano Hangout Grand Counsel

TonySoprano

Posted
Posted

Gee, thanks. We just had the magic of a Roy Firestone reverse jinx work AT FENWAY, and have climbed back to .500.  There is no other rational explanation how the team managed to keep a 2-1 lead at Fenway.  None.   Now there's this??  Really?

Do I have to remind the crowd that on May 9th, the above thread was started, and the Orioles were a season high 22-10?  https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL201705090.shtml  

Oh, and to those who feel the uncontrollable need to declare there's no such thing as jinxes, and you know who you are, keep it to yourself.  B|   

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
El Gordo Hangout Grand Counsel

El Gordo

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TonySoprano said:

Gee, thanks. We just had the magic of a Roy Firestone reverse jinx work AT FENWAY, and have climbed back to .500.  There is no other rational explanation how the team managed to keep a 2-1 lead at Fenway.  None.   Now there's this??  Really?

Do I have to remind the crowd that on May 9th, the above thread was started, and the Orioles were a season high 22-10?  https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/BAL/BAL201705090.shtml  

Oh, and to those who feel the uncontrollable need to declare there's no such thing as jinxes, and you know who you are, keep it to yourself.  B|   

I do believe in jinx I do I do I do

hqdefault.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • bpilktree67
      The Difference between the O's and other Playoff teams

      By bpilktree67 · Posted

      I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • OsFanSinceThe80s
      The Difference between the O's and other Playoff teams

      By OsFanSinceThe80s · Posted

      And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • bpilktree67
      Offseason Trade Pondering

      By bpilktree67 · Posted

      I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • OsFanSinceThe80s
      Other teams playoffs game thread

      By OsFanSinceThe80s · Posted

      Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • Roll Tide
      Offseason Trade Pondering

      By Roll Tide · Posted

      For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • Roll Tide
      Offseason Trade Pondering

      By Roll Tide · Posted

      I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 24fps
      The Difference between the O's and other Playoff teams

      By 24fps · Posted

      192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...