Jump to content

.500+ record, or no. 13 overall draft pick?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

If they get to .500 because they play Sisco and Hays and Santander and they all tear the cover off the ball, I'm fine with moving down in the draft.

If they get to .500 because they bench the kids and Mark Trumbo and Chris Davis hit a few home runs to salvage their season statistics, then I will not be particularly happy about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tx Oriole said:

It doesn't matter. Whoever does the drafting for the O's will foul it up. 

Really, seems like we've drafted pretty well in the past bunch of years.   Machado, Mancini, Schoop, Bundy, Gausman, Hays, Mullins, Davies, Hader, Bridwell, Sisco, Mountcastle, Stewart, Akin, Harvey... all draftees who have either succeeded at the big league level or seem to show a lot of potential to.   Obviously too early to tell but it doesn't seem like we have been drafting poorly the last 7 years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Frobby said:

FWIW, 13th picks have totaled 322 rWAR, 18th picks have totaled 161.    So, exactly double.     That result is a bit fluky, though.   The 13th pick has done better than the 12th, while the 18th pick has done worse than the 19th.   In fact, the 19th has done better than either the 12th or 13th, too.    

Surprised. What years do these cover? Have your source material available?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Surprised. What years do these cover? Have your source material available?

All years are covered.   My source is BB-ref, which has a great draft database you could play with all day.

13th pick: https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?overall_pick=13&draft_type=junreg&query_type=overall_pick&from_type_jc=0&from_type_hs=0&from_type_4y=0&from_type_unk=0

18th pick: https://www.baseball-reference.com/draft/?overall_pick=18&draft_type=junreg&query_type=overall_pick&from_type_jc=0&from_type_hs=0&from_type_4y=0&from_type_unk=0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Really, seems like we've drafted pretty well in the past bunch of years.   Machado, Mancini, Schoop, Bundy, Gausman, Hays, Mullins, Davies, Hader, Bridwell, Sisco, Mountcastle, Stewart, Akin, Harvey... all draftees who have either succeeded at the big league level or seem to show a lot of potential to.   Obviously too early to tell but it doesn't seem like we have been drafting poorly the last 7 years or so.

I was thinking about pitching in particular. Maybe I am overreacting about the draft. Drafting a pitcher that could become a TOR would be nice. Hope Harvey can become one. Want the pitching to improve. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Wow. Very nice. I need to find my source material that claimed that there was not much drop off by pick after the #1 overall. Will get back to you when/if i figure out what I had read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Beef Supreme said:

Wow. Very nice. I need to find my source material that claimed that there was not much drop off by pick after the #1 overall. Will get back to you when/if i figure out what I had read.

As I mentioned, 13 vs. 18 is a very fluky comparison.   

17: 309

18: 161

19: 369

20: 393

The fact that 18 has done so poorly is just random chance.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Really, seems like we've drafted pretty well in the past bunch of years.   Machado, Mancini, Schoop, Bundy, Gausman, Hays, Mullins, Davies, Hader, Bridwell, Sisco, Mountcastle, Stewart, Akin, Harvey... all draftees who have either succeeded at the big league level or seem to show a lot of potential to.   Obviously too early to tell but it doesn't seem like we have been drafting poorly the last 7 years or so.

And the O's 2016 6th round pick was traded for Beckham!    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Frobby said:

As of today, the O's are tied for the 13th-worst record in baseball.   If they finish at .500+, they could end up passing 5 other teams in the standings and getting the 18th pick rather than the 13th.     Is it worth the 5 draft slots to you for us to finish at .500+ for the sixth year in a row?

Poll coming?  For me no, but I won't wish them to lose.  In fact, third place seems so much better than last.  So I guess yes then....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In 2010, the Nats picked Bryce Harper 1st overall, and the O's drafted Manny with the 3rd pick.  The 13th pick that year was Chris Sale, while with the 34th and 38th picks, the Blue Jays drafted Aaron Sanchez and a guy by the name of Noah Syndergaard.  In 2011, the O's nabbed Dylan Bundy 4th overall.  The Mets used the 13th pick for OFer Brandon Nimmo while Oakland used the 18th pick for Sonny Gray.  Kevin Gausman was the 4th overall pick in 2012, followed by Courtney Hawkins (CWS) 13th and the Dodgers grabbed Corey Seager with the #18 slot.

The moral of the story, in hindsight, teams make numerous mistakes in evaluations every year.  In 2011-12, the 18th picked proved to be more valuable than the 13th.  As a matter of principle therefore, no I will not be happy going sub .500 as the 5 slots ahead in the draft are not a slam dunk deal breaker.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • ???. Cowser took more swings against LF than any other LH hitter on the team ( not named  Henderson). He was one of the guys they did not platoon.
    • I think Kevin Seiyltzer was the fall guy for a team that thought they were a championship team.  This guy has overseen more a decade of hitting in Atlanta, has been through developing and helping young batters succeed when the league adjusts.  Most importantly, he has a ring! 
    • Glad one poseur AL team is out.  I hope CLE wins and knocks the other one out tomorrow. 
    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...