Jump to content

You snooze you lose - Doug Fister


Luke-OH

Recommended Posts

The Rangers just signed Fister for just 4m guaranteed and it includes a reasonable team option.

Now Fister isn’t the most exciting rotation option but at that price you can’t tell me he wouldn’t be worthwhile for a team that needs to find three starters and whose in-house options (Ynoa, Long, Hess) are probably best suited for a bullpen role.

edit: here is the link https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2017/11/rangers-to-sign-doug-fister.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Agreed. At that price he would have been an excellent option. 

And to your point (Corn), there was no talk that we were even interested in him. That's the problem, not whether or not he would have signed with us. 

Then again, I'm guessing Duquette doesn't work over holiday weekends. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Agreed. At that price he would have been an excellent option. 

And to your point (Corn), there was no talk that we were even interested in him. That's the problem, not whether or not he would have signed with us. 

Then again, I'm guessing Duquette doesn't work over holiday weekends. 

I think that most of the stuff that leaks is meant to leak.

I have no idea if they were interested in Fister but a lack of talk doesn't mean much.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Of course we have no evidence that Fister would have signed a comparable deal with the O's.

Sure, Andrew Miller took $36MM/4 instead of $40MM. We can/will never know for sure if a player would sign with any club in particular, even if for much more money. But it is rare. For Doug Fister, would $5MM plus a team option not have moved the needle? How about $6MM, with a $9MM team option? The Orioles are so, so desperate for starting pitching that low investment, short-term contracts must be pursued to garner two or three rotation possibles out of the four, five or six needed. At that small of an investment, Fister looks like more of a probable, than just a possibly good, SP investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave Cameron had projected $9 mm for Fister, while the fangraphs crowdsource had projected $8 mm.    I’m a bit shocked he’d sign for a $4 mm guarantee this early in the offseason, rather than waiting for the market to develop.    But maybe there are incentives in this deal that haven’t been reported and are pretty attainable.   

https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-2018-free-agent-bargains/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Agreed. At that price he would have been an excellent option. 

And to your point (Corn), there was no talk that we were even interested in him. That's the problem, not whether or not he would have signed with us. 

Then again, I'm guessing Duquette doesn't work over holiday weekends. 

Dan is more concerned looking for filler for Norfolk or Bowie right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Maybe Duquette is targeting other pitchers.  Better pitchers.  I'm not the least bit bothered that we didn't sign Doug Fister.

Here’s the thing: who are they targeting? And I’m not talking about the regurgitated “interest” stories. Do you really think they’re looking at Cobb or Lynn? It doesn’t really make sense if they’re looking at a rebuild or a massive restock next season.

Fister is mediocre at best, but him or anyone on a reasonable one year deal makes sense for the Orioles. He was better than both Tillman and Jimenez last year. I know Tillman has a better track record but I’m not paying him $10 mil after he fell off a cliff. Maybe Gonzalez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

Maybe Duquette is targeting other pitchers.  Better pitchers.  I'm not the least bit bothered that we didn't sign Doug Fister.

When has Duquette ever targeted better pitchers? He's always waited until the last possible moment and then signed guys like Ubaldo and a guy with his arm hanging off (Gallardo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Agreed. At that price he would have been an excellent option. 

And to your point (Corn), there was no talk that we were even interested in him. That's the problem, not whether or not he would have signed with us. 

Then again, I'm guessing Duquette doesn't work over holiday weekends. 

That's a problem with DD I have. Of course there is no way of knowing he didn't talk with Fisters agent. But good golly he should have if he didn't. Since the team needs pitchers. IMO 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mdbdotcom said:

29 teams failed to make this deal.

Thanks, Duquette.

I’m not anti DD, I think I’ve been clear about that.

29 teams didn’t have 3 open spots in their rotation and limited funds and the stated desire to compete.  

There may be one or two other teams that fit that criteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...