Jump to content

DD: O's must be "more proactive" on pitchers, but "no 4-5 year deals"


Frobby

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Doesn't wildcard have some Kool Aid for you?  We need more positive Frobby or this hot stove season will be the pits!  Man up!  :ph34r:

I consider myself to be a realist who appreciates that in real life there are always unexpected things that can happen that make things turn out better or worse than you expect.    So I wouldn’t go into 2018 feeling hopeless if Cashner and Vargas were our two pitching acquisitions; I just wouldn’t feel very optimistic about it.   2012 reminded me never to assume you know what will happen before the season is played.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
57 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

If it was as simple as signing people who were good last year, then Ubaldo and Gallardo would have been good signings.  All of those guys have serious questions going forward, especially Cashner who posted terrible peripherals and has seen his velocity decline substantially.  

You really believe they will all crash and burn? They probably won't accrue that many QS but I doubt any of them are done They need only to average 13 QS to get us to the playoffs, if the offense and pen do their jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frobby said:

I consider myself to be a realist who appreciates that in real life there are always unexpected things that can happen that make things turn out better or worse than you expect.    So I wouldn’t go into 2018 feeling hopeless if Cashner and Vargas were our two pitching acquisitions; I just wouldn’t feel very optimistic about it.   2012 reminded me never to assume you know what will happen before the season is played.   

I don't know if that is different than what you had said but it sure sounds like a more positive Frobby!  Good!  Now if we can get Moose on board.....I X'd out all of my FA choices and I was left with Tillman and the 40 year old knuckleballer!   We can do this with Buck I Trust!  Right Gordo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

You really believe they will all crash and burn? They probably won't accrue that many QS but I doubt any of them are done They need only to average 13 QS to get us to the playoffs, if the offense and pen do their jobs.

If I had to name one pitcher in all of baseball whose ERA would crash and burn from 2017 to 2018, Cashner would be it.

I mean it's just too much like Gallardo to make up.  Guys who lost their fastball, stopped missing bats, but managed to put up solid ERAs despite all the ERA estimator metrics saying they pitched very poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

You have to couple the AAAA players with selling off current assets. That includes Machado, Schoop, Jones, Britton, Brach and could mean players like Givens or Mancini if the right offer was made. They're obviously not doing that...they're just probably signing players like Vargas and Cashner who I really don't care to watch unless it was with shiny new prospects with a bright future. 

I think they are keeping their options open. If I had to predict, I think they will stink this year and trade Manny, Britton, and Brach at the deadline. But they might make a move now if they got a really good offer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, foxfield said:

 

The answer of course is yes. He has kept his promise. And no it does not depend on the definition of “contending” or “competitive”.  Unless of course you define either word incorrectly.  

Dictionary definitions:
contend -- to compete with a good chance of winning
competitive -- as good as or better than others of a comparable nature

Peter Schmuck has repeatedly claimed that Dan Duquette's stated objective is to be competitive every year (however, I cannot find a supporting quote). 

If I discount the 2015/.500 season, the team has contended and been competitive in 4 of Duquette's 6 years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm predicting the O's big pitching addition is Harvey.  He has pitched like an ace before (before multiple surgeries).  The O's marketing department will try to sell him as an ace to the casual fan.  Signings of Gonzalez and Tillman are likely too.

90 losses here we come.

Bundy

Gausman

Harvey

Gonzalez

Tillman

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

I'm predicting the O's big pitching addition is Harvey.  He has pitched like an ace before (before multiple surgeries).  The O's marketing department will try to sell him as an ace to the casual fan.

No fan is going to buy tickets because of Matt Harvey.     I can’t imagine the marketing department doing a single thing to feature Matt Harvey as they try to sell tickets.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, oriole said:

I cannot stand the way this team is being run right now. Either rebuild or retool for another go at it but signing players like Vargas or Cashner is a losing team even if they have decent years.

It is rather hilarious. Can you imagine Vargas starting starting against the Yankees? The fact that they won't rebuild is crazy. How in the world can you risk losing Manny for a draft pick? BUT remember that DD is signed for one more year, which means he has no vested interest in a rebuild. I don't blame him, I blame the owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, AZRon said:

Dictionary definitions:
contend -- to compete with a good chance of winning
competitive -- as good as or better than others of a comparable nature

Peter Schmuck has repeatedly claimed that Dan Duquette's stated objective is to be competitive every year (however, I cannot find a supporting quote). 

If I discount the 2015/.500 season, the team has contended and been competitive in 4 of Duquette's 6 years.

 

A GM should not be judged solely on wins and losses at the major league level. You have to look at the whole picture. For instance, Cashman traded away some guys knowing they would not win as many games the rest of that year. But, he was setting up to win more games in future years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

No fan is going to buy tickets because of Matt Harvey.     I can’t imagine the marketing department doing a single thing to feature Matt Harvey as they try to sell tickets.   

The marketing department has a really low bar.  I remember Jay Gibbons being a huge focus of the marketing department. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

The marketing department has a really low bar.  I remember Jay Gibbons being a huge focus of the marketing department. 

I remember the kids are coming to play was a big ad in the early 2000s and featured Chris Richard and Brook Fordyce holding Jerry Hairston.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

I remember the kids are coming to play was a big ad in the early 2000s and featured Chris Richard and Brook Fordyce holding Jerry Hairston.  

Yeah, that was after they traded a bunch of vets and didn’t re-sign Mussina.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever happened to the theory that we would have lots of money to spend after clearing salaries of JJ, Ubaldo, Tillman, Miley?

I get why DD would not want to blow the team up in the last year of his contract, but why not make some effort at a "last hurrah" and go all in? I don't get it.

From Roch today:

 The Orioles have been defined at the Winter Meetings as the team that needs multiple starting pitchers but won’t spend big on them, as well as a left-handed bat, and must decide whether to trade third baseman Manny Machado and closer Zach Britton in a rebuild-versus-reload tug of war.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2017/12/catching-and-left-handed-relief-also-on-orioles-shopping-list.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Whatever happened to the theory that we would have lots of money to spend after clearing salaries of JJ, Ubaldo, Tillman, Miley?

I get why DD would not want to blow the team up in the last year of his contract, but why not make some effort at a "last hurrah" and go all in? I don't get it.

From Roch today:

 The Orioles have been defined at the Winter Meetings as the team that needs multiple starting pitchers but won’t spend big on them, as well as a left-handed bat, and must decide whether to trade third baseman Manny Machado and closer Zach Britton in a rebuild-versus-reload tug of war.

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2017/12/catching-and-left-handed-relief-also-on-orioles-shopping-list.html

 

Who had that theory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
    • Seth Johnson on the Phillies' "philosophy": Orioles are data driven, Phillies are more "old school". I don't get much out of this but it's a data point. https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/mlb/philadelphia-phillies/seth-johnson-mlb-debut-phillies-orioles-trade/613582/ “I think the big thing is that Baltimore is very data-based,” he said. “Here’s a nice blend of the numbers and baseball strategy. Kind of old school. And I’ve been really enjoying it so far. For me, it’s kind of simplified everything. Concentrating on basic concepts like moving the fastball around. Not worrying about pitch shapes all the time. Just going out here and trying to pitch.”
    • If we have room, why wouldn't we add Pham and Van Loon just to have available depth in AAA (whether or not they are at risk of being taken)? 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...