Jump to content

1988 v. 2018 W/L Tracker


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, eddie83 said:

2010 is an interesting comp as well. 

They were 29-59 at this point. Went 3-14 over next 17 to get to 32-73. Buck then took over.

Then went 34-23 rest of way. 

There is zero chance that this year's team will be 32-73 after 105 games.

They say it's how you leave the team when you are done. According to this criterion, Showalter and DD failed pretty badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply
8 minutes ago, atomic said:

When do we play the Royals?   I think when they play us they will suddenly get hot. 

The Orioles played them in Baltimore from May 8-10 and won two out of three. The next series is Aug. 31-Sept. 2 in Kansas City.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Through 89 games the Orioles are 24-65

The 1988 Orioles were 29-60

The 2003 Tigers were (wait for it)

 

(wait for it)

 

(seriously.........just a bit longer............)

24-65  !

Chasing history!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Through 89 games the Orioles are 24-65

The 1988 Orioles were 29-60

The 2003 Tigers were (wait for it)

 

(wait for it)

 

(seriously.........just a bit longer............)

24-65  !

Chasing history!

A feel an Orioles sweep coming today.   Yacabonis and Yefry to the rescue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 41 games under .500 BEFORE the All Start break?  ?

I thought I would never be as embarrassed by my team then the 0-21 88 start, but that may have taken it's place... :bangwall:

Just like in 88, I'll be honest I don't care who get's traded.  I won't miss any of them.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/6/2018 at 12:27 PM, JR Oriole said:

Trout went 25th...so a lot of teams missed that one.  Betts went 172nd.  But being on the Red Sox automatically makes everyone better. 

This No. 1 pick thing is completely overblown. 

It’s not overblown, in the sense that it’s hard to completely blow the no. 1 pick.     He may not be (and probably won’t be) the most successful of all players drafted that year, but his odds of being good to very good are high.    

Players over 20 WAR:

#1: 21

#2: 13

#3: 8

#4: 10

#5: 8

#6: 8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Might as well update this at the break........what else is there to do?

 

Through 97 games,  the O's are 28-69 so far.    The 1988 O's were 31-66.    The 2003 Tigers were 26-71.

Guess we're trending up a little bit!  Royals are still threatening to pass us for the #1 though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Aglets said:

Might as well update this at the break........what else is there to do?

 

Through 97 games,  the O's are 28-69 so far.    The 1988 O's were 31-66.    The 2003 Tigers were 26-71.

Guess we're trending up a little bit!  Royals are still threatening to pass us for the #1 though.

 

As a reminder, the 1988 team went 24-31 (.436) between July and August.  July 2018, the mark is 5-10 and counting.  It would take 19-21 over the next 6 weeks to match 1988.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be better than the 88 team they would have to go 27-34.  I think they is zero percent chance of that happening.  We might be able to pass the 2003 Tigers but I wouldn't be on it.   16 more wins seems like a stretch.   But it will be close. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, atomic said:

To be better than the 88 team they would have to go 27-34.  I think they is zero percent chance of that happening.  We might be able to pass the 2003 Tigers but I wouldn't be on it.   16 more wins seems like a stretch.   But it will be close. 

Yeah, they'd have to double their win total in 39 less games than their current pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...