Jump to content

1988 v. 2018 W/L Tracker


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

1988 46-85
2018 37-94 - 9.0 GB

14 straight wins would put 2018 in a tie at 51-94.  5-19 with 4 games left in August means the 5th straight month this year under 10 wins.  Very little suspense at this point.  Tragic number is 14 losses with 31 games remaining.

1988    54    107    0.335
1954    54    100    0.351
2009    64    98    0.395
2001    63    98    0.391
1955    57    97    0.370
2010    66    96    0.407
2002    67    95    0.414
1991    67    95    0.414
1987    67    95    0.414
2018   37     94    0.282

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply
14 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

1988 46-85
2018 37-94 - 9.0 GB

14 straight wins would put 2018 in a tie at 51-94.  5-19 with 4 games left in August means the 5th straight month this year under 10 wins.  Very little suspense at this point.  Tragic number is 14 losses with 31 games remaining.

1988    54    107    0.335
1954    54    100    0.351
2009    64    98    0.395
2001    63    98    0.391
1955    57    97    0.370
2010    66    96    0.407
2002    67    95    0.414
1991    67    95    0.414
1987    67    95    0.414
2018   37     94    0.282

The Orioles are on pace to join the 1962 Mets as one of the only teams to never win 10 games in a single month over the course of a season.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

The Orioles are on pace to join the 1962 Mets as one of the only teams to never win 10 games in a single month over the course of a season.   

Prior to September 2017, the last time the Orioles failed to win 10 games in a full month was July 2011.   Including last September, the O's are at 6 straight, 4 of which at a .269 clip or worse.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

1988 50-90
2018 41-99 - 9.0 GB

1988 won game #141, but then ended on a 3-17 run.  It took them 153 games before they reached the century mark in losses.  That said, with the deficit as large as it is, it would take a 14-8 finale to finish 0.5 games ahead of 1988.  Yeah, about that

@ TBR 9/7-9
V. OAK 9/11-13
V. CHW 9/14-16
V. TOR 9/17-19
@ NYY 9/21-23
@ BOS 9/24-26
V. HOU 9/27-30

My guesstimate is 46-116.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, TonySoprano said:

1988 50-90
2018 41-99 - 9.0 GB

1988 won game #141, but then ended on a 3-17 run.  It took them 153 games before they reached the century mark in losses.  That said, with the deficit as large as it is, it would take a 14-8 finale to finish 0.5 games ahead of 1988.  Yeah, about that

@ TBR 9/7-9
V. OAK 9/11-13
V. CHW 9/14-16
V. TOR 9/17-19
@ NYY 9/21-23
@ BOS 9/24-26
V. HOU 9/27-30

My guesstimate is 46-116.

I think that's a solid guesstimate.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TonySoprano said:

1988 50-90
2018 41-99 - 9.0 GB

1988 won game #141, but then ended on a 3-17 run.  It took them 153 games before they reached the century mark in losses.  That said, with the deficit as large as it is, it would take a 14-8 finale to finish 0.5 games ahead of 1988.  Yeah, about that

@ TBR 9/7-9
V. OAK 9/11-13
V. CHW 9/14-16
V. TOR 9/17-19
@ NYY 9/21-23
@ BOS 9/24-26
V. HOU 9/27-30

My guesstimate is 46-116.

The Yankees, Red Soxs and Astros positions in the playoff hunt might be solidified by the time we play them.  We might not be facing their A team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, atomic said:

The Yankees, Red Soxs and Astros positions in the playoff hunt might be solidified by the time we play them.  We might not be facing their A team.

Watch the Orioles close out the season on winning streak and lose the number one draft pick to the Royals. 

You never want your team to lose, but it's September.  No reason to lose the number one draft in a season that was over in April.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Watch the Orioles close out the season on winning streak and lose the number one draft pick to the Royals. 

You never want your team to lose, but it's September.  No reason to lose the number one draft in a season that was over in April.

 I think the Orioles are comfortably behind the Royals at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atomic said:

The Yankees, Red Soxs and Astros positions in the playoff hunt might be solidified by the time we play them.  We might not be facing their A team.

NY and HOU have the same record and OAK is 3.5 GB.  Which team will the Orioles have at the end?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

I think that's a solid guesstimate.  

Yeah, if Buck and DD can lead this group of duds to 46 W's, I'd rehire them in a NY minute!  I'm bad with math, but that would give us a .283 losing percentage, right?  Not too shabby!  We can probably sign them to one year contracts, ensuring good quotes and "peace in the valley" until we get some production from our late July haul.  ⚾

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobmc said:

Yeah, if Buck and DD can lead this group of duds to 46 W's, I'd rehire them in a NY minute!  I'm bad with math, but that would give us a .283 losing percentage, right?  Not too shabby!  We can probably sign them to one year contracts, ensuring good quotes and "peace in the valley" until we get some production from our late July haul.  ⚾

Don;t want to mess up these great stats.

2017:

September 7 20 83 155 .259
October 0 1 0 6 .000

 

2018:

March 1 1 5 8 .500
April 7 19 93 144 .269
May 9 19 111 145 .321
June 6 20 88 129 .231
July 9 16 113 128 .360
August 8 20 121 185 .286
September 1 4 13 24 .200
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Going Underground said:

Don;t want to mess up this great stats.

2017:

September 7 20 83 155 .259
October 0 1 0 6 .000

 

2018:

March 1 1 5 8 .500
April 7 19 93 144 .269
May 9 19 111 145 .321
June 6 20 88 129 .231
July 9 16 113 128 .360
August 8 20 121 185 .286
September 1 4 13 24 .200

Even after our solid March record, we never really recaptured our "giggyup" until July when we almost had double digit W's.  Unfortunately, our August swoon cost us.  If i were a betting man, I would not predict double digit W's for September.  If we can get a rainout on 9/30, and if the final game with HOU is necessary, we could have a perfect October.  But again, I'm not a betting man.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...