Jump to content

2019 Draft Order Tracker


bpilktree67

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 473
  • Created
  • Last Reply
13 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

With the Royals losing Moustakas, I personally believe they're the favorite to get the #1 pick.  I'm still hoping for #1, but if I were a betting man...

For the rest of the season, if you look at the strength of the remaining schedules, KC has the 5th easiest schedule while the Orioles have the hardest schedule left.  

https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/sortable/extras/strength_of_schedule.php

So we got that going in our favor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, eddie83 said:

Loss column is key.  

I am afraid we will overtake KC, they are worse than we are.  

Does it really matter? There's no consensus #1 guy in next year's draft. The Orioles won't be missing out on a Harper or Strasburg if they pick #2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

Does it really matter? There's no consensus #1 guy in next year's draft. The Orioles won't be missing out on a Harper or Strasburg if they pick #2. 

If there isn't a real 1-1 type guy, it's pretty easy to grab a really good player and sign him for 1M or so underslot. The Twins did that with Royce Lewis in 2017, which is working out nicely for them. That extra 1M pretty much buys a team an extra 3rd round talent as a late round overslot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, TINSTAAPP said:

Does it really matter? There's no consensus #1 guy in next year's draft. The Orioles won't be missing out on a Harper or Strasburg if they pick #2. 

It's far too early to gauge the strength of the draft, and who will be at the top can only be speculated on.  By May of next year, the board will begin to take shape and we all hope there are two or three guys that seem like can't miss star players, ala Alex Rodriguez, Ken Griffey, Jr, or Ben McDo... errrr, Stephen Strasburg. ;)  Odds are against it, however.  I'd be happy to get a great prospect, regardless, and the early reports have a couple guys that seem like they could be special.  We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

It's far too early to gauge the strength of the draft, and who will be at the top can only be speculated on.  By May of next year, the board will begin to take shape and we all hope there are two or three guys that seem like can't miss star players, ala Alex Rodriguez, Ken Griffey, Jr, or Ben McDo... errrr, Stephen Strasburg. ;)  Odds are against it, however.  I'd be happy to get a great prospect, regardless, and the early reports have a couple guys that seem like they could be special.  We'll see.

Exactly. Always better to have the #1 pick, just to be safe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Greg Pappas said:

It's far too early to gauge the strength of the draft, and who will be at the top can only be speculated on.  By May of next year, the board will begin to take shape and we all hope there are two or three guys that seem like can't miss star players, ala Alex Rodriguez, Ken Griffey, Jr, or Ben McDo... errrr, Stephen Strasburg. ;)  Odds are against it, however.  I'd be happy to get a great prospect, regardless, and the early reports have a couple guys that seem like they could be special.  We'll see.

Tim Beckham, Mark Appel, Delmon Young, Brady Aiken,  Luke Hochevar,  Matt Bush,  Bryan Burlington.  All guys drafted Number 1 overall between 2002 and 2014.  I wouldn't be that worried about getting number 1 overall and more interested in seeing the players play better. If guys can start producing than you can always trade them for prospects.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Let  Westy  play 3B vs right handed pitching and LF vs left-handed pitching.    Urias can play 3B vs lefties.   This is only needed if Cowser can't hit lefties. Mateo and Westy can be platoon in the outfield IMO.
    • O'Neil seems like a perfect fit if he doesn't cost too much in years or dollars.   
    • I don’t think we choked. Stubborn as hell. We literally went down with the same sinking ship philosophy that we had the entire 2nd half of the season.  The young guys just have to adjust. I mean getting completely shut down for 5 post season games has to wear on them. If it doesn’t, then we were never built to win. 
    • Right now the 2025 OF has three LHH OF in Cowser, Mullins, and Kjerstad. I’m not sure what the bench makeup of this team will be, but it looks like we’ll need 1-2 RHH options.  We could bring Slater back on a small “Tony Kemp” like 1 year deal or a milb deal.  With Santander leaving, and Mateo back to being in the CF mix once healthy, do we go with a more COF RHH type? Trades are a possibility as well, but here is a list of upcoming RHH OF Free Agents,    
    • I actually didn't suggest a reliever as the return, that was SG. I was thinking more about trading veterans to acquire pitching prospects, probably lower level lottery tickets. I'd rather pick up ML roster pieces through free agency (assuming of course that Rubenstein will allow a significant payroll boost.).
    • Each player is different. Each player may have a somewhat different hitting philosophy, based on their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone is a “power hitter.” I would not coach a Tony Santander the same as a Jordan Westburg, or a Jorge Mateo, or a Cedric Mullins. Some should be more selective, while others may need to do more damage and it’s ok for them to K more because the power payoff is worth it. Some should have a more oppo approach, while others may need to try to pull the ball more. The Waltimore certainly has messed with many of our RH bats.  Being a hitting coach is a lot of work, and it is usually not often a position held for many years. They seem to often be a scapegoat when the players do not hit. I wonder what drove the players to swing more at pitches they probably should not have. I seriously doubt it was Ryan Fuller. Hitting coaches have a general philosophical approach, like Fuller would have hitters learn to take pitches they cannot hit well, with less than 2 strikes.. He wanted them to swing only at pitches they can do damage with. They do not dramatically change. For the Orioles to become much more free swinging, that must have driven Fuller to leave. So be it. Going forward, they probably need to be somewhere in between the previous two years. In the playoffs, they get pitched to differently. It’s higher intensity. You have to be proficient in putting the ball in play. You have to be able to take what the game gives you, and execute. There is no excuse for repeatedly having runners in scoring position with less than two outs and repeatedly not being able to get them home. Bases loaded, no outs, hitters 2,3 and 4 coming up…we have to score there. The approach was to hit a grand slam. Awful baseball. A ton of talent on this roster, and something has to change. 
    • I have been pretty happy with Kjerstad's defense in the outfield corners.   Not that I want him in left at home.     I agree with what Elias said about Mayo's body type being more suited for 1B.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...