Jump to content

Jonathan Villar- Our new 2B?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

He's off to a good start, which is nice, and though it's only two games in, he does seem to bring an energy and speed threat that we haven't had in a long time.  He's arbitration eligible next year and remains under our control through the 2120 season.  It would be huge for this team if Villar regained his 2016 form, or even something close to it, as his trade value would spike notably. 

Again, I get it... it's way too early... but one can dream, right? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2018 at 9:13 PM, Roy Firestone said:

I just spoke to Jonathan Schoop, literally last hour at Dodger Stadium. What surprised him was trading for a second baseman who is OLDER than he is. While Jon isn't angry or sad, he is surprised at what the Orioles got back for him. As in, underwhelmed(my words). I am underwhelmed too.

Schoop hasn't been around a rebuilding team. Sometimes you take on contracts to get the younger players, as long as they aren't too bad or too long. Villar is a good stopgap guy who had no value to the Brewers but might have value to the O's. I would not be surprised if Villar puts up a better year than Schoop sometime in the next 2-3 years. Although Villar is older, he actually has another year of control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2018 at 5:32 PM, Lucky_13 said:

.8 dWAR according to Baseball Reference. Schoop was replacement level

You don’t equate 0.0 dWAR with replacement level.    dWAR includes an adjustment for what position you play.   A 0.0 SS is not the same as a 0.0 1B.    In that scenario the SS is well below average and the 1B is well above average.    And, a half season of defensive stats is pretty worthless.

I’m interested in Villar.     He’s probably the closest thing we’ve had to a true leadoff hitter since BRob.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Frobby said:

You don’t equate 0.0 dWAR with replacement level.    dWAR includes an adjustment for what position you play.   A 0.0 SS is not the same as a 0.0 1B.    In that scenario the SS is well below average and the 1B is well above average.    And, a half season of defensive stats is pretty worthless.

I’m interested in Villar.     He’s probably the closest thing we’ve had to a true leadoff hitter since BRob.    

Villar has tools. Nothing wrong with a trade that works out for both teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

 

The recently departed Jonathan had 4 names (Jonathan Rufino Jezus Schoop.)

So does our new Jonathan. 

 

 

(vs. RANGERS, 8/05)

 

NUMBER 7

 

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

JONATHAN RAFAEL VILLAROQUE

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really wondering why the Brewers traded Villar. He looks like a much more exciting and polished hitter than Schoop. He brings way more to the table. Villar looks exactly like they type of player a playoff team wants. I didn't see much of Villar before he became an Oriole. Maybe being traded motivated him?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dark Helmet said:

I'm really wondering why the Brewers traded Villar. He looks like a much more exciting and polished hitter than Schoop. He brings way more to the table. Villar looks exactly like they type of player a playoff team wants. I didn't see much of Villar before he became an Oriole. Maybe being traded motivated him?

They think Schoop can play SS. Villar can’t. So it must have been for positional value and Schoop’s power potential. Plus Villar was banged up and Schoop was healthy. 

So far so good for us. Way too early to evaluate the trade, but I think you can say the difference in the two players isn’t that much.  Villar has more control, and we picked up two really nice prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

They think Schoop can play SS. Villar can’t. So it must have been for positional value and Schoop’s power potential. Plus Villar was banged up and Schoop was healthy. 

So far so good for us. Way too early to evaluate the trade, but I think you can say the difference in the two players isn’t that much.  Villar has more control, and we picked up two really nice prospects. 

Range has never been Schoops strong suit. He definitely has the arm, but I don't see Schoop as even an average SS. But I see what your saying.

To me, Villar represents the start of getting away from that all or nothing approach at the plate and going more towards a more athletic take that extra base kind of offense.

Edited by Dark Helmet
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Brewers message boards starting to think they got a raw deal.

http://forum.brewerfan.net/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=37322&start=340

A bunch of comments about Villar being in Counsell's "doghouse" for no particular reason. Sounds like possibly a Kim type of situation.

Of course they are, Schoop has started off slow, Villar has been playing pretty well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Does anybody know that he is an ex Yankee?
    • I put this ridiculousness in the game recap, but I think it belongs here as well.  Using AI you can really make some crazy stuff. 😂 https://suno.com/song/8f21dd9e-af4e-4284-9f23-c566260ca6ce
    • A buddy of mine made this with his AI. I figured I’d just put this here. 😂   https://suno.com/song/8f21dd9e-af4e-4284-9f23-c566260ca6ce
    • I was listening to MLB Prospects podcast last week. They talked about Gillen, and mentioned a lot about how he may be the best high school hitter. However, it’s a tough call where he’ll go because of a weak arm. They said the arm was injured, a right labrum, and his arm strength is not back after two years. So, probably wasn’t going to be a SS anyway when said and done due to size, maybe a 2B/LF or CF profile due to the weak arm and 60 speed. He was projected to maybe become the top high school player in the draft as a sophomore, but injured the shoulder and had some other injuries that have held him back. It is going to be interesting to see where Elias goes with picks 22 and 32. I would like to see Gillen there, but I think he’ll be gone. Kellon Lindsey is interesting, and maybe Billy Amick, along with one of the previous college hitters you mentioned will sneak through. Lindsey is rising fast.
    • A good friend of mine coaches college baseball.  He’s studied and dedicated his career to understanding how humans move. Not all humans move the same way.  An incredible talent could potentially be taught to move against his body’s preference and fail.  New wave progressive coaches understand how various body types work and the nuance to teach/coach them effectively.  
    • I'm still trying to figure out how this guy is out of the majors for 7 years and somehow manages to pick up 2 MPH on his fastball, at the age of 34.  But hey, I'm not complaining.   Statcast loves him so far this year.  Statcast thought he was a little unlucky in his last stint in the majors, and unsurprisingly they think he's getting a little lucky now, but even accounting for his good luck he's still in great pitcher territory.
    • 2 "gutsy" starts in a row.  That's exactly what you want out of veterans to demonstrate to the young guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...