Jump to content

Has anyone been able to get a read on Mullins’ defense?


Hallas

Recommended Posts

The two plays that stood out were the two triples where he whiffed on the catch but Jones wouldn’t have even come close to getting to.  I think he should have caught both those balls though to be honest.

 

Were there any other notable plays from CF this series?  I’m talking major leagues only - I know about his rep from the minors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hallas said:

The two plays that stood out were the two triples where he whiffed on the catch but Jones wouldn’t have even come close to getting to.  I think he should have caught both those balls though to be honest.

 

Were there any other notable plays from CF this series?  I’m talking major leagues only - I know about his rep from the minors.

That first triple had a catch probability of zero.

Since the Statcast era started no one has made that catch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, connja said:

it's just nice to have speed in the lineup.  he scored from second on a soft single to left the other day, no other Oriole for like 5 years would have done that.

Gentry or Rickard probably could have. But I hear you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had an OF assist credited at second on Saturday night, throwing out Brock Holt.  I watched the replay and in actuality he had made the weak throw home when Betts scored but Wynns threw out Holt at second trying to advance.  Mullins was part of the PO but Wynns earned it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That first triple had a catch probability of zero.

Since the Statcast era started no one has made that catch.

Didn’t see it, so does that mean he made a mistake going for it in the first place or amazing he almost got to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That first triple had a catch probability of zero.

Since the Statcast era started no one has made that catch.

The one by Bradley?  It had a hit probability of 39%.

But I don't entirely trust Statcast hit probability.  It's listed some 420+ shots in LCF/RCF as having a hit probability less than 100%.  No major league stadium has power alleys that deep.

x2xwrav.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, murph said:

Didn’t see it, so does that mean he made a mistake going for it in the first place or amazing he almost got to it?

Amazing that he even got there. But he looked tentative on the ball to the RCF gap. However, there’s a bit of a learning curve knowing who you’re playing alongside. I think it’s very clear he’s going to get to many more balls than Jones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hallas said:

The one by Bradley?  It had a hit probability of 39%.

But I don't entirely trust Statcast hit probability.  It's listed some 420+ shots in LCF/RCF as having a hit probability less than 100%.  No major league stadium has power alleys that deep.

x2xwrav.png

That differs from the initial reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/12/2018 at 8:59 PM, Can_of_corn said:

That first triple had a catch probability of zero.

Since the Statcast era started no one has made that catch.

 

On 8/12/2018 at 9:38 PM, Hallas said:

The one by Bradley?  It had a hit probability of 39%.

But I don't entirely trust Statcast hit probability.  It's listed some 420+ shots in LCF/RCF as having a hit probability less than 100%.  No major league stadium has power alleys that deep.

x2xwrav.png

I don’t think catch probability and hit probability are the same thing.   Catch probability is specific to one fielder and takes into account where that fielder was positioned.   Hit probability just looks at exit velocity and launch angle, without regard to the direction in which the ball is hit or the positioning of the various fielders.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online


  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...