Jump to content

Britton on the use of analytics in New York vs. Baltimore


Babkins

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 238
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is the part that bothers me:

Quote

A recent survey by The Athletic’s Eno Sarris and Marc Carig said the Orioles had a staff of five in research and development, tied for the fifth-smallest department in the majors. The Dodgers and Yankees each employ 20 in R&D, tied for most in the majors, and their respective managers, Dave Roberts and Aaron Boone, work closely with their front offices to integrate the data they receive, as do many other managers.

Even if Buck wasn't big on analytics, isn't the department being small still on Dan? Aren't analytics used in a lot of ways that go beyond managerial decisions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

This is the part that bothers me:

Even if Buck wasn't big on analytics, isn't the department being small still on Dan? Aren't analytics used in a lot of ways that go beyond managerial decisions?

Maybe.

It might also be hard to get funding for your project if the Manager, who holds a lot of sway, is dismissive of their efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

This is the part that bothers me:

Even if Buck wasn't big on analytics, isn't the department being small still on Dan? Aren't analytics used in a lot of ways that go beyond managerial decisions?

Good question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Plenty of blame to spread all around:  Buck, Dan, Ownership, Lew Ford.

So my exceptional bright wife was filling me in about a horrible Jaba Chamberlain segment on SiriusXM that she listened to where Jaba and all his Yankeeness trashed Joe Musgrove and the Astros for their analytic approaches. He told them that it was all about feel and instinct and nothing about data. Child of the Bronx. 

He embarrassed himself and anyone who managed him. Quite rude to Musgrove from here explanation as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

Analytics are stats crunched by a computer. Have any of you played the game? You can not be thinking about that and have any success. Ever.

So players have never received scouting reports before and still played? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weams said:

So my exceptional bright wife was filling me in about a horrible Jaba Chamberlain segment on SiriusXM that she listened to where Jaba and all his Yankeeness trashed Joe Musgrove and the Astros for their analytic approaches. He told them that it was all about feel and instinct and nothing about data. Child of the Bronx. 

He embarrassed himself and anyone who managed him. Quite rude to Musgrove from here explanation as well. 

Tell her I said Hi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

So players have never received scouting reports before and still played? 

The difference is that Earl knew who hit well against a certain pitcher. Earl knew  where the batter hit the ball the last ten times. 

Earl did not know Cuellar's spin rate. Or the amount of break on his pitches. Lateral movement and plain. 

He did not know that a certain batter was 75% hard hit against forkballs above the belt.  

Hinch is given that data to use or to ignore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

You can scout and do whatever. You still have to hit, field, and pitch. No scouting or analytics will help with that.

There are only 800 fellows in the entire world that have the skills to do those things. Not 3000. Not 7500. That extra data helps them be league average or better. Those 800. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...