Jump to content

How long does your blank check for Elias last?


FanSince88

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, weams said:

I could not disagree more.

Why not start a prediction calendar on when the first negative thread shows up (not by our Debbie Downers who hate everything)? I'd bet by the end of Spring Training, and I could even see one about the choice of manager.  I like the choice of Elias; I think he'll be great, but we've spent two years in a culture of negativity.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pheasants said:

Why not start a prediction calendar on when the first negative thread shows up (not by our Debbie Downers who hate everything)? I'd bet by the end of Spring Training, and I could even see one about the choice of manager.  I like the choice of Elias; I think he'll be great, but we've spent two years in a culture of negativity.

Well that I can embrace. And when the losing gets to three years of it, many will bolt the stable. Remember it's been two years already. So after five years of unfathomable losses, there will be few true believers left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Pheasants said:

Why not start a prediction calendar on when the first negative thread shows up (not by our Debbie Downers who hate everything)? I'd bet by the end of Spring Training, and I could even see one about the choice of manager.  I like the choice of Elias; I think he'll be great, but we've spent two years in a culture of negativity.

NSFW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F

On 11/17/2018 at 9:28 PM, Moose Milligan said:

 

 

On 11/17/2018 at 6:42 PM, FanSince88 said:

For me, it's five years.  I'm going to refrain from wondering if he's the right man for the Orioles until the end of 2023.  If by then we still aren't over .500 AND our minor league system isn't better than mediocre AND it's clear that Elias has actually been the one calling the shots, then I will start to be worried that he might not be suited for the GM role in Baltimore.  But by 2023 if he is able to get the team winning again or we aren't winning yet but our minors are elite or the ownership is breaking their promise and keeps meddling in baseball decisions, then I will be fine with Elias continuing in his role indefinitely.  Just hope he isn't poached by another organization before the Orioles start to see success at the majors.  

For me it's 3 years. By then I want to be champing at the bit for some young MiL players to be called up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FanSince88 said:

Thanks for the correction, although I would like to see a weighted average of across the board projections of these prospects (assuming the OH rank is not that).  As I'm sure you're aware, there's no way Rodriguez makes the ML roster as a SP until 2022 at the earliest.  Likewise, I'd be very surprised if DL Hall makes the ML roster until late 2020 at the very, very earliest.  That's our top two right there -- still speculative and a long way off.  Mountcastle is a nice hitter and all but a negative in the field by all accounts, unless we most him to first where CD is blocking him.  Will be interesting to see if Kremer or Hays get a cup of coffee at the majors next year -- 2019 will be a make or break year for both of those guys.  There's no way I would consider Hunter Harvey above a 50 at this point, the guy is totally snakebit by injuries even worse than Bundy was which I can't believe I'm saying but it's true.  I'm a bit embarrassed but I've not heard of Lowther/Knight/Hanifee before, will have to check those guys out.  

Regardless, the word on the street seems to be that our minor league system is still in the bottom third even with all DD's midseason aquisitions.  Don't see Elias realistically propelling it to the top ten -- unless a few guys come out of nowhere -- before 2021 at the earliest.  

It certainly won’t happen overnight.   I’ve seen rankings of our system that are near the middle, and others that are near the bottom.    Maybe we could be top 10 in 2020 if a lot of things broke our way, but I tend to agree 2021 is more realistic.   (I am talking about the beginning of the 2021 season, just to be sure we’re on the same page about what 2021 means).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2018 at 10:22 AM, weams said:

We were supposed to win in 2014. Manny. Wieters, Davis. They caused the failure. 

Ned Yost's voodoo powers caused the failure.

Markakis, Jones, Cruz, Pearce, and Hardy also should have figured out a way to score more than one run off of Jeremy freakin' Guthrie and Jason freakin' Vargas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pheasants said:

Why not start a prediction calendar on when the first negative thread shows up (not by our Debbie Downers who hate everything)? I'd bet by the end of Spring Training, and I could even see one about the choice of manager.  I like the choice of Elias; I think he'll be great, but we've spent two years in a culture of negativity.

I doubt the manager decision will get much negativity towards it. I expect a low salary hire as why pay top dollar for someone.  Just need someone who is good at developing players and not so much concern about game time decisions or ability to talk to the press. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, interloper said:

Yeah what the heck happened in that series man. 

I think people don’t give that Royals team enough credit.   They finished that season 41-23 (.640), then won the WC game, swept the Angels, swept the Orioles and lost a hard fought World Series in 7 games.   Then they turned right around and won 95 games and the World Series the following season.     It was a very good team that was coming into its own the last couple of months of 2014.   Great outfield defense, great bullpen, great team speed.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, atomic said:

That was because KC outfielders were super fast and the Orioles outfielders were all slow. 

Our outfield defense was pretty good in 2014 — +17.7 UZR.

The Royals, on the other hand, were unbelievably good — +42.4 UZR.    And they played great in that series.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Our outfield defense was pretty good in 2014 — +17.7 UZR.

The Royals, on the other hand, were unbelievably good — +42.4 UZR.    And they played great in that series.   

Some of that positive outfield defense UZR  during the year was David Lough who did not play in that series replaced by either De Aza or Cruz in the outfield.  And neither Machado nor Davis played in that series.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, atomic said:

Some of that positive outfield defense UZR  during the year was David Lough who did not play in that series replaced by either De Aza or Cruz in the outfield.  And neither Machado nor Davis played in that series.  

Good point on Lough.   He most often played as a defensive replacement, which is tough to do when you never have the lead (the O’s never lead after the 4th inning or later in that series, and had only one lead at any time).    

Davis and Manny had no impact on the outfield defense, needless to say.    

I was out of town and saw very little of that series, but had the impression it was more a matter of the Royals playing great defense than us playing poor defense.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Johnson isn't on the 40 man roster so a promotion would involve some juggling there. Also, while his .920 OPS looks impressive please keep in mind that Ryan McKenna's career OPS at Norfolk was .915. I liked the energy Johnson brought to his game during Spring Training, reminded me a lot of Gunnar's attitude. While I'm not sure he'd be any more valuable on paper than McKenna was, I'm certainly willing to give chances to guys that play the game balls to the wall like he did. 
    • I doubt there is anything in the Union contract preventing MLB from using an electronic strike zone. So long as no umpires are let go or reduced in pay they would have no cause for a grievance or work stoppage. The issue for them would simply be the blow to their ego as they would lose influence over the games that they're used to having. Boo hoo.  IMO the critical reason for MLB to establish an electronic strike zone would be to eliminate the chances of a gambling scandal involving a home plate umpire going rogue in order to change the outcome of the game. I doubt a Black Sox like conspiracy could occur these days simply because players make so much money that it wouldn't make sense for a group of them to throw a game. But a single corrupt umpire calling balls and strikes in a big game could have an enormous influence on the final score. Ask the '97 Braves. Robo-umps would do away with such a possibility forever. 
    • I didn't want to say it, but since your brought it up.....I agree.   I have been involved in the fitness industry as both a person who has worked out with heavy weights for years, a company level as I used to own a supplement company, and a social media level as I know many of the social influencers involved in the fitness industry.   I can tell you that squatting that amount and even further dead lifting that amount, even for a fervent power lifter is very very rare.  Let alone for someone who weighs 180 pounds like JH, who is worth many millions,  and what makes it even more unlikely is there is no way IN H E L L that the O's brass is going to let him try and DL 700 pounds.  We are talking snap city when it comes to the back DLing that amount.  Just no way he could even do that based on his build, which is ok but nothing great.  Plus even IF he could, the Os would never let him.    End of story.   Here is one of the stronger guys I know on you tube who is around JH's weight, actually 10 pounds more, and it took years and years of training to DL 600 pounds for him.   Yet somehow a guy with JHs build is Deadlifting 700 at the age of 20?  Righttttttt lol.      
    • I'm looking at the Rays record over the past decade and I'm a bit confused over your definition of "have not won much". However, my argument is simple - teams that don't invest in payroll don't win championships in baseball. Over the past 21 years (I was going to do 20, but added the extra to include Florida's win in 2003), the average payroll position relative to the league of the eventual WS champ was 9th (see below) Year WS Champ OD Payroll rank 2003 FLA 25 2004 BOS 2 2005 CWS 13 2006 STL 11 2007 BOS 2 2008 PHI 12 2009 NYY 1 2010 SF 10 2011 STL 11 2012 SF 8 2013 BOS 4 2014 SF 7 2015 KC 16 2016 CHC 14 2017 HOU 18 2018 BOS 1 2019 WAS 7 2020 LAD 2 2021 ATL 13 2022 HOU 11 2023 TEX 9   Only three of these teams had payrolls in the bottom half of league: Florida in 2003 had by far the lowest payroll, at 25th. Their payroll climbed to as high as 18th over the next couple of years, but they couldn't maintain their success and haven't made the playoffs since, outside of the COVID season. KC in 2015 had the 16th lowest payroll, barely below the median payroll for the year. They haven't been back to the playoffs since. Houston in 2017 had the 18th lowest payroll. This was their big breakthrough year after their tanking/rebuild, and they haven't been lower than 11th since, and as high as 4th.   The trend is obvious. After the Marlins' miracle run in 2003, no team has won the WS with a payroll lower than 18th, and that team (Houston) is an obvious outlier as they were in the basically the same spot as the O's now (on the upswing from a full tear-down). While KC and Florida both had years where everything came together perfectly, they were unable to sustain their momentum. The O's were 23rd in payroll on Opening Day, and the current roster is good enough to win a championship, but history suggests they'll go the way of Florida and Kansas City if Rubenstein isn't willing to invest in the payroll. Consistently letting the talent drain out of your organization because you aren't willing to pay them won't lead to multiple championships and it won't keep fans engaged.
    • Correlation vs. Causation: The study states that there is a correlation between 1RM (one-rep max) squat and performance metrics like the 10-yard split and 40-yard dash times. However, correlation does not imply causation. Just because these variables are correlated does not mean that one causes the other.   
    • I think he's claimed and right away.
    • His Dad is a big boy and obvious lifter.  Some guys are naturally good squatters.  That’s an impressive number for Holliday, but who knows exactly how legit the actual squat is.  You can find high school kids at nearly every high school about his size with similar squat numbers.  Granted, they will be some of the strongest pound for pound kids, but it’s not a crazy number. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...