DrungoHazewood Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said: I saw. What really caused me to start questioning their numbers was when they had a Rays catcher's framing worth 4 wins in under 120 games. My thinking is, if framing is that valuable why isn't that value being reflected in the free agent deals? If every team knows a guys framing is going to win them four extra games over 120 starts someone is going to pay. The only justification I can think of is that teams don't believe it. I suppose it's possible that it's true but no one buys into it. Yes, if Jose Molina's framing was worth +5 wins in a half a season's innings of catching he should be playing 140 games a year even if he's OPS'ing .450. And some team should be willing to pay him $24M for being +5 in framing minus 2 in everything else... or 3 wins x $8M. And Ryan Doumit should have been traded to the AL to DH or moved to first base immediately. Instead the Twins acquired him and let him be their full time catcher for two seasons, years later. Or maybe they see Jonathan Lucroy. He had multiple seasons where he was allegedly worth +3 to +5 wins from framing. Then in 2017 he was -2.5 wins. I don't know of another skill set in baseball where there can be 7 or 8 win swing in value and nobody really notices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said: The only justification I can think of is that teams don't believe it. I suppose it's possible that it's true but no one buys into it. Yes, if Jose Molina's framing was worth +5 wins in a half a season's innings of catching he should be playing 140 games a year even if he's OPS'ing .450. And some team should be willing to pay him $24M for being +5 in framing minus 2 in everything else... or 3 wins x $8M. And Ryan Doumit should have been traded to the AL to DH or moved to first base immediately. Instead the Twins acquired him and let him be their full time catcher for two seasons, years later. Or maybe they see Jonathan Lucroy. He had multiple seasons where he was allegedly worth +3 to +5 wins from framing. Then in 2017 he was -2.5 wins. I don't know of another skill set in baseball where there can be 7 or 8 win swing in value and nobody really notices. I think the teams, at least some of them, have more accurate information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 2 hours ago, RZNJ said: Either my math is bad or that is only 24 players. Ah! 6 infielders. He can't add. How can we trust anything Trezza says now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said: I think the teams, at least some of them, have more accurate information. Fast was working for the Astros, yes? And now he’s somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Frobby said: Fast was working for the Astros, yes? And now he’s somewhere else. He wasn't working for any team when he published his original data. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said: I think the teams, at least some of them, have more accurate information. Sure. Or they just interpret and regress the data differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said: He wasn't working for any team when he published his original data. Yes, I know. I think he was with BP then. Just saying the public founder of this type of analysis did get hired, by a team very much at the forefront of analytics, so they must have thought the analysis had some value. Of course, for all we know, some teams may have been quantifying pitch framing before Fast ever published anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Can_of_corn Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Frobby said: Yes, I know. I think he was with BP then. Just saying the public founder of this type of analysis did get hired, by a team very much at the forefront of analytics, so they must have thought the analysis had some value. Of course, for all we know, some teams may have been quantifying pitch framing before Fast ever published anything. Fast's results were a lot flatter than the folks who succeeded him. He didn't project anyone's framing to be worth 4+ wins in a season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Frobby said: How can we trust anything Trezza says now? Better watch out, you already have Roch wanting to meet you behind the school! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frobby Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 Just now, Tony-OH said: Better watch out, you already have Roch wanting to meet you behind the school! I’m just parodying wildcard. I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdbdotcom Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Frobby said: I’m just parodying wildcard. I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six. That requires the fingers on both hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 13 minutes ago, Frobby said: I’m just parodying wildcard. I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six. Trezza has been solid, especially for a young guy trying to learn a new organization. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcard Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 Tony, i have to give you credit. You were the only one I read late in ST saying that Alberto would make OD. But there he is barring a waiver wire acquisition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcard Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Frobby said: I’m just parodying wildcard. I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six. Actually Trezza, Roch and Meoli all could not figure out early in ST that the O's needed a 5th starter of April 3rd. Roch did figure it out about a week or 10 days ago. I don't know if the other two have yet. Its pretty basic reporting if they are covering the O's and its hard to give the readers insight when they don't know what they are talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony-OH Posted March 25, 2019 Author Share Posted March 25, 2019 21 minutes ago, wildcard said: Tony, i have to give you credit. You were the only one I read late in ST saying that Alberto would make OD. But there he is barring a waiver wire acquisition. Well thanks, but was more of an assessment based on the situation. Elias had reacquired him after the Giants tried to sneak him through waivers after taking him off waivers from the Orioles. This told me that Elias liked the guy. When you looked at the other options available (Escobar, Wilkerson, Vincej, Peterson and Reinheimer) and the fact that Alberto had no options left and had been lost before, it made the most sense. Now whether he can make it through the waiver claims or even this season is certainly up for debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.