Jump to content

TT: Sisco among last cuts, roster takes shape


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I saw.  What really caused me to start questioning their numbers was when they had a Rays catcher's framing worth 4 wins in under 120 games.

My thinking is, if framing is that valuable why isn't that value being reflected in the free agent deals?

If every team knows a guys framing is going to win them four extra games over 120 starts someone is going to pay.

The only justification I can think of is that teams don't believe it.  I suppose it's possible that it's true but no one buys into it.  

Yes, if Jose Molina's framing was worth +5 wins in a half a season's innings of catching he should be playing 140 games a year even if he's OPS'ing .450.  And some team should be willing to pay him $24M for being +5 in framing minus 2 in everything else... or 3 wins x $8M.  And Ryan Doumit should have been traded to the AL to DH or moved to first base immediately.  Instead the Twins acquired him and let him be their full time catcher for two seasons, years later.

Or maybe they see Jonathan Lucroy.  He had multiple seasons where he was allegedly worth +3 to +5 wins from framing.  Then in 2017 he was -2.5 wins.  I don't know of another skill set in baseball where there can be 7 or 8 win swing in value and nobody really notices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 minute ago, DrungoHazewood said:

The only justification I can think of is that teams don't believe it.  I suppose it's possible that it's true but no one buys into it.  

Yes, if Jose Molina's framing was worth +5 wins in a half a season's innings of catching he should be playing 140 games a year even if he's OPS'ing .450.  And some team should be willing to pay him $24M for being +5 in framing minus 2 in everything else... or 3 wins x $8M.  And Ryan Doumit should have been traded to the AL to DH or moved to first base immediately.  Instead the Twins acquired him and let him be their full time catcher for two seasons, years later.

Or maybe they see Jonathan Lucroy.  He had multiple seasons where he was allegedly worth +3 to +5 wins from framing.  Then in 2017 he was -2.5 wins.  I don't know of another skill set in baseball where there can be 7 or 8 win swing in value and nobody really notices.

I think the teams, at least some of them, have more accurate information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He wasn't working for any team when he published his original data.

Yes, I know.    I think he was with BP then.    Just saying the public founder of this type of analysis did get hired, by a team very much at the forefront of analytics, so they must have thought the analysis had some value.    Of course, for all we know, some teams may have been quantifying pitch framing before Fast ever published anything.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Yes, I know.    I think he was with BP then.    Just saying the public founder of this type of analysis did get hired, by a team very much at the forefront of analytics, so they must have thought the analysis had some value.    Of course, for all we know, some teams may have been quantifying pitch framing before Fast ever published anything.   

Fast's results were a lot flatter than the folks who succeeded him.  He didn't project anyone's framing to be worth 4+ wins in a season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tony-OH said:

Better watch out, you already have Roch wanting to meet you behind the school! :D

I’m just parodying wildcard.    I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m just parodying wildcard.    I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six.  

Trezza has been solid, especially for a young guy trying to learn a new organization. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m just parodying wildcard.    I think Trezza has done a decent job so far, even if he can’t count to six.  

Actually Trezza, Roch and Meoli all could not figure out early in ST that the O's needed a 5th starter of April 3rd.    Roch did figure it out about a week or 10 days ago.  I don't know if the other two have yet.   Its pretty basic reporting if they are covering the O's and its hard to give the readers insight when they don't know what they are talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Tony,   i have to give you credit.  You were the only one I read late in ST saying that Alberto would make OD.   But there he is barring a waiver wire acquisition.

Well thanks, but was more of an assessment based on the situation. Elias had reacquired him after the Giants tried to sneak him through waivers after taking him off waivers from the Orioles. This told me that Elias liked the guy. When you looked at the other options available (Escobar, Wilkerson, Vincej, Peterson and Reinheimer) and the fact that Alberto had no options left and had been lost before, it made the most sense.

Now whether he can make it through the waiver claims or even this season is certainly up for debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...