Jump to content

I really want to keep Villar (Update: Traded to Marlins for LHS Easton Lucas)


AceKing

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

The Elias Plan, as I understand it, says that the answer is no. Unless a player looks like a guy who will be part of the next contending team -- whenever that is now targeted to be -- the goal is to cut payroll. Since it doesn't look like Villard will be around that long and there are doubts as to whether he'd be a desirable guy to have on a team built to contend, there's no reason to add payroll in order to get his help in winning a few games over the next year or two. Maybe he'd be worth it at $1.5 million or so, but signing him that cheap seems awfully unlikely. That's what the Plan (again, as I understand it) calls for.

Cutting payroll is one piece of the Plan. The other is (or could be) trading assets for future value. It is true, we haven't seen that piece yet from Elias. There was apparently no market for Villar at the deadline, and Givens/Bleier etc did us no favors.

Will also be interesting to see what happens with Mancini and Bundy as well. By WAR, at least, Villar has more value so I am still holding out hope that we will get something back for him. Maybe they trade him in the offseason rather than nontendering but I have to think they can get something for a 2-3 WAR middle infielder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

What could go wrong with extending a middle infielder into his 30's?  It worked great the last two times.

So you are comparing a athletic MI to a couple big slow 1B/DH types? 

Plus a 3 year deal would only be 31 

And it’s 5ish million per ... not 12.5 or 23 million

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Cutting payroll is one piece of the Plan. The other is (or could be) trading assets for future value. It is true, we haven't seen that piece yet from Elias. There was apparently no market for Villar at the deadline, and Givens/Bleier etc did us no favors.

Will also be interesting to see what happens with Mancini and Bundy as well. By WAR, at least, Villar has more value so I am still holding out hope that we will get something back for him. Maybe they trade him in the offseason rather than nontendering but I have to think they can get something for a 2-3 WAR middle infielder.

It doesn’t happen every day but I hear enough radio guys complaining about dumb plays from Villar often enough that is seems a regular problem. Not just bad throws. Errors are bad but just demonstrate bad defense. The guys talk about throws or running without thinking 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

So you are comparing a athletic MI to a couple big slow 1B/DH types? 

Plus a 3 year deal would only be 31 

And it’s 5ish million per ... not 12.5 or 23 million

He is talking Hardy and Roberts.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weams said:

He is talking Hardy and Roberts.

Hardy seemed to be around forever. But had health issues before he got here. 

Roberts gave himself a concussion on purpose by hitting himself in the head with a bat.

I don’t believe either guy was 31 in the final year of a contract 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Nice interview of Don Long about Villar’s improved approach at the plate.    Makes me think Long may be just the guy to coach Mountcastle once he’s here.  

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2019/08/long-on-villar-hes-really-under-control.html

I think there is a big difference in his approach according to many outlets including him. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/20/2019 at 2:35 PM, Roll Tide said:

So you are comparing a athletic MI to a couple big slow 1B/DH types? 

Plus a 3 year deal would only be 31 

 And it’s 5ish million per ... not 12.5 or 23 million

Villar will be ~3.5 WAR player this year and has averaged ~2.5 over the last four years.   Granted he had a rather dismal 2017.  But going by WAR, a 2.5 WAR player is worth roughly $20 million/yr on the open market, because teams have been paying roughly $8m/WAR/year.   Of course the relationship isn't perfectly linear and there's the issue of supply and demand at the given position.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GuidoSarducci said:

Villar will be ~3.5 WAR player this year and has averaged ~2.5 over the last four years.   Granted he had a rather dismal 2017.  But going by WAR, a 2.5 WAR player is worth roughly $20 million/yr on the open market, because teams have been paying roughly $8m/WAR/year.   Of course the relationship isn't perfectly linear and there's the issue of supply and demand at the given position.  

Can't edit my post anymore, but I was wrong about the cost per WAR teams were willing to pay.  Its actually more like $5.7 million for position players.  https://community.fangraphs.com/on-war-its-linearity-and-efficient-free-agent-contracts/

So if Villar is valued at 2.5 WAR, his FA price would be 5.7 * 2.5 roughly $14 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elias got on the job late last offseason. I think we see a much more active Elias this offseason. Villar could be an attractive option because it would only be a one year commitment. Less risk than FA.

A team like the Reds would be a good fit. I’ll even toss a name out...  Rece Hinds 3B

http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2019?list=cin

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/21/2019 at 10:20 AM, Roll Tide said:

Hardy seemed to be around forever. But had health issues before he got here. 

Roberts gave himself a concussion on purpose by hitting himself in the head with a bat.

I don’t believe either guy was 31 in the final year of a contract 

CoC's comparison of Villar to the signings of Hardy and Roberts is far-fetched (especially if one factors in age, as you have pointed out), but I don't quite understand your reasoning here.

1. Yes, Hardy had had some injuries before coming to Baltimore, but he recovered and put in several stellar seasons. Resigning him once new injuries and age clearly made it difficult for him to play well was a foolish decision, as CoC implied. Don't quite understand why you think a history of pre-Oriole injuries can serve as an alibi.

2. Where did you got the fascinating idea that B-Rob intentionally gave himself a concussion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GuidoSarducci said:

Can't edit my post anymore, but I was wrong about the cost per WAR teams were willing to pay.  Its actually more like $5.7 million for position players.  https://community.fangraphs.com/on-war-its-linearity-and-efficient-free-agent-contracts/

So if Villar is valued at 2.5 WAR, his FA price would be 5.7 * 2.5 roughly $14 million.

I haven’t studied the matter, but I’m not sure I believe the calculation in that article.   I’d think that if Fangraphs itself believed it, they’d change the valuations they publish for position players.    But they haven’t done so.

PS - Note that the article was using data from 2006 to 2017.   Per Fangraphs, the value of 1 WAR in 2006 was $4.8 mm.   So $5.7 mm for position players over that entire 12 year period is more plausible.    That doesn’t tell you what the market rate is today.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...