Jump to content

Calling Elias incompetent is unfair


wildcard

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Let me just twist your idea a bit.

I'd love to keep Villar but not at $10.4M. I think the market has spoken about that. If he couldn't be traded last July, and can't now.....so far...I don't think it's a good gamble to believe he could be next July at $10.4M.

He's not a long term asset, and at $10.4, he doesn't have trade value. 

Elias had chances to get Villar at less than $10.4 million.  He could've extended him last off season. He could've offered a compromise and maybe he wants to stay. He could've offered 7 million and agreed to split the difference.

Perhaps this season when a team loses a guy to injury his value would jump.

I think its fine to look this and assume. But there are variables that could change things. I think 10.4 is the worst case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Word is they have trade partners for Bundy.

I firmly believe that at the last two deadlines and this offseason teams have tried to trade Villar and have seen very little interest.  I wouldn't be shocked to find out he was quietly shopped last offseason.

But ... Maybe they had trade partners for Villar. Just not at the asking price??? According to many here Bundy has little or no value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

He played in156 games in 2016.

I must have erased that out of my post.  That was the only other year he had full time duty.  His output was similar to this year's, not quite as good, and he was never able to solidify an everyday roll until this year.  And that is perhaps as much due to us having no one else to give a go in that position.  I guess the point is, I'm underwhelmed given some of his past chances and am not on the bandwagon with simply shelling out 10+Million to see what happens.  I've got no problem walking away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Elias had chances to get Villar at less than $10.4 million.  He could've extended him last off season. He could've offered a compromise and maybe he wants to stay. He could've offered 7 million and agreed to split the difference.

Perhaps this season when a team loses a guy to injury his value would jump.

I think its fine to look this and assume. But there are variables that could change things. I think 10.4 is the worst case scenario.

Maybe every bit of your post is accurate. But I can't be sure of it. You know how some agents are...just intent on getting the most for their client.

And I think your idea of "when some team loses their guy" is a good one because chances are high it'll happen to someone. 

Just my opinion but I think the projected arb figure killed everything. Look at it this way. If Villar wasn't with the O's last year, would we pay him $10.4 for this year? 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

But ... Maybe they had trade partners for Villar. Just not at the asking price??? According to many here Bundy has little or no value.

You won't convince me that Elias was trying to sell high on Villar and turned down a reasonable return, not without evidence we are not likely to see.  Look what he accepted back for dumping Cashner's contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Maybe every bit of your post is accurate. But I can't be sure of it. You know how some agents are...just intent on getting the most for their client.

And I think your idea of "when some team loses their guy" is a good one because chances are high it'll happen to someone. 

Just my opinion but I think the projected arb figure killed everything. Look at it this way. If Villar wasn't with the O's last year, would we pay him $10.4 for this year? 

This team wouldn’t pay 1 million for Villar if he weren’t on the team last season .  Which is the saddest thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Maybe every bit of your post is accurate. But I can't be sure of it. You know how some agents are...just intent on getting the most for their client.

And I think your idea of "when some team loses their guy" is a good one because chances are high it'll happen to someone. 

Just my opinion but I think the projected arb figure killed everything. Look at it this way. If Villar wasn't with the O's last year, would we pay him $10.4 for this year? 

Absolutely not and apparently no other team is willing to either. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, atomic said:

This team wouldn’t pay 1 million for Villar if he weren’t on the team last season .  Which is the saddest thing.

Exactly. Which means 2 things: you get what you can for him, and so far, that hasn't worked but still might by 1:00 Monday............and............if you can't trade him, you don't bring him back.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Absolutely not and apparently no other team is willing to either. 

Exactly, yet people are furious that we haven't traded him.

I just can't believe Elias has turned down any reasonable offer. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Elias had chances to get Villar at less than $10.4 million.  He could've extended him last off season. He could've offered a compromise and maybe he wants to stay. He could've offered 7 million and agreed to split the difference.

Perhaps this season when a team loses a guy to injury his value would jump.

I think its fine to look this and assume. But there are variables that could change things. I think 10.4 is the worst case scenario.

So now we're going to play the hindsight game huh? He should have extended Villar last year just after he started and was still getting acclimated? Should he have cured cancer and ended world hunger too? Why stop there, maybe Elias should have reversed global warming too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

You won't convince me that Elias was trying to sell high on Villar and turned down a reasonable return, not without evidence we are not likely to see.  Look what he accepted back for dumping Cashner's contract.

Agreed ... but some have speculated that this is a play to up the ante and time frame. A stupid risk imo ....But if it works then we can be pleasantly surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 7Mo said:

Maybe every bit of your post is accurate. But I can't be sure of it. You know how some agents are...just intent on getting the most for their client.

And I think your idea of "when some team loses their guy" is a good one because chances are high it'll happen to someone. 

Just my opinion but I think the projected arb figure killed everything. Look at it this way. If Villar wasn't with the O's last year, would we pay him $10.4 for this year? 

He produced 4 WAR 

Quote

While opinions differ, FanGraphs, in particular, generally values free agents at $9 million per WAR. However, is one win at the major league level actually worth $9 million to the organization?

According to WAR he's worth considerably more

https://onsideview.com/us-sports/mlb/win-really-worth-baseball/

 

He's not if you are inclined to believe he's more likely to produce another stinker (.1 WAR) as opposed to being somewhere between 2.7 and 4.0. At his age I suspect the later is more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Agreed ... but some have speculated that this is a play to up the ante and time frame. A stupid risk imo ....But if it works then we can be pleasantly surprised.

You say it's a stupid risk but what if Elias knew he had 2 or more teams pretty interested?

If he waits, or lets the other teams continue to slow play him, he's gotta tender and then deal with whatever the arb figure winds up being.

If he outrights, he forces their hand.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Agreed ... but some have speculated that this is a play to up the ante and time frame. A stupid risk imo ....But if it works then we can be pleasantly surprised.

I'll admit that is is possible he turned down more at the deadline that he can get now.  I just don't think he turned down anything that would actually aid the rebuild in a meaningful way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

He produced 4 WAR 

 

Absolutely he did. And he's projected at 1.8 WAR.

But no matter. I can say all day what my house is worth. But what's the true value?

What someone will pay for it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yeah I think they need to staggar the lefties in the rotation order. R-R-L-R-L like that.
    • Trading Mayo Kjerstad and Povich for one guy to become a relief pitcher is nuts.
    • We don't need starting pitchers. We need Relief Pitchers. We don't need average Relief Pitchers, we need consistent high leverage/high K Relief Pitchers.
    • If you feel comfortable putting Aiken and Baker (or even Tate) in during an elimination series, that's your prerogative. But I do not. Too inconsistent, which is the same reason why Mike Baumann pitched himself off the active roster. when spot was needed for returning starters off the IL. Currently Coulombe is on IL so we can't even count on one of our best. Cano has regressed from last season. We've also witnessed last season how Webb broke down from over use and was ineffective in the playoff series against Texas. Perez goes in streaks of either really good or concernedly bad (he loses his command). Akin's problem is he leaves the ball over the heart of the plate and he doesn't have good enough stuff to get away with it. They're meatballs. We might get some good times from Baker now that he's up, but I would only expect a month or 2 at best from him before he returns to old habits. And Suarez is a starter who wants to be a starter. Who knows if he will go back to the bullpen? He'll have to go deeper into games if he wants to stay in the rotation, otherwise, I think he should be in the bullpen. But that's not what he is right now in this moment. He's a starter with a ERA in the 1s.
    • It's pretty hard to say definitively that the bolded is true.  It might be, but there's also the loss in ability you have to account for.  30 year olds are slower than 26 year olds too.  Maybe their game knowledge and practice have made it so they can overcome the meager loss in bat speed/athleticism over that time span.  But the picture is a bit muddy.   I also don't think the aging issue is limited to people in their mid-late 30s.  Bat speed peaks at like 24 or 25 based on the data we have right now on it, and after 31 starts falling off fairly fast.  Obviously this is population data and individuals are likely to see different curves.   But outside of the stars that have a lot of ability to lose, it's becoming pretty clear that once you hit your early 30s it's pretty hard to maintain your skills without all the "help" that is extensively tested for.   I think that even for early-30s players teams are much more willing to drop them over giving them expensive market-rate deals, especially since they can abuse young talent so readily.
    • After a really dumb day at work, this was an absolutely delightful read. Seeing a diamond expert and a can of corn detonate a yoked PBA pro was absolutely wonderful. I love this website. 
    • If you pitch Bradish on 5 days rest you'd pitch Rodriguez on 3 days rest?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...