Jump to content

The Astros and Red Sox Punishments


weams

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildbillhiccup said:

The reality is that the end of the baseball careers for those men will have a very minimal impact on the franchise. It needed to be harsher for the franchise (not the individuals). 

The loss of those picks is enormously damaging to the health of a franchise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, interloper said:

The loss of those picks is enormously damaging to the health of a franchise. 

I know, imagine where the Orioles would have been if they hadn't taken Brandon Snyder, Garrett Olson, Billy Rowell, and Pedro Beato with their first two picks in 2005 and 2006!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Here is a hypothetical Buck.

Do or die playoff game on the road, extra innings.  You can throw either the reliever having literally the best season ever had by a reliever or an up and down starting pitcher who hasn't been able to hold onto a spot in your rotation.

Who do you pitch?

Ooh ooh and what if your opponent is a homer happy squad, the starter is prone to gopher balls and the reliever extremely is not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, interloper said:

The loss of those picks is enormously damaging to the health of a franchise. 

 

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I know, imagine where the Orioles would have been if they hadn't taken Brandon Snyder, Garrett Olson, Billy Rowell, and Pedro Beato with their first two picks in 2005 and 2006!

I guess interloper should have said “the health of a competent franchise.”

I think the various elements of the punishment, taken together, are a fair penalty.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I still think it's a ridiculous escalation over prior penalties. 

 

I haven’t studied prior penalties, but sometimes you just need to set a new standard and not worry about what was done in the past.    The point is to deter future conduct.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I haven’t studied prior penalties, but sometimes you just need to set a new standard and not worry about what was done in the past.    The point is to deter future conduct.    

That's not how I would go about things.  You punish in accordance to precedence and then you establish new guidelines.

This would be akin to a pitcher getting caught using resin and bullfrog to get a better grip and getting a 50 game suspension when Matusz got eight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's not how I would go about things.  You punish in accordance to precedence and then you establish new guidelines.

This would be akin to a pitcher getting caught using resin and bullfrog to get a better grip and getting a 50 game suspension when Matusz got eight.

Like I said, I haven’t studied past precedent.   What has happened previously that you consider comparable, and what were the punishments?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Mayo coming back from injury could have his debut in Baltimore delayed. 
    • Wasn't a huge fan of his swing for that last out today but coming in to pinch hit with 2 outs isn't easy.
    • Interpreting Malike's comment that way is theoretically possible, but I didn't take it that way--didn't feel that shade was being thrown on me at all. But thanks for the concern.
    • People are being a bit ridiculous with the holier than thou takes criticizing a little humor. I am not saying what happened couldn’t cause a significant concussion, but it would be a bit of a fluke if it did. Mullins barely hit him with the bat and he had a helmet on. The fact that it was in the back of the head did make him more vulnerable, but this wasn’t the type of thing you see and think he was lucky to be alive.  Guys have probably hit their heads harder on the top of the dugout or on the fence making catches.  And note this comes from someone whose son has suffered severe concussions and who is well aware of the dangers associated with them. In short, people need to lighten up a bit on guys like Roy.  It was a little gallows humor. 
    • Yeah, you read that wrong. LA2 is one of my favorite posters here and he knows it. No harm, no foul. If you aren't familiar with the game threads, it doesn't matter what the team is doing, people complain about it and people did make that same joke in the game thread long before Roy said it here. Game thread in summary - when the O's are not doing well, it's insufferable, when they are doing well, it's mildly less insufferable. There, that wasn't hard. I'd appreciate it if you didn't assume I'm throwing shade at people. I'll leave that up to you to do, you're really good at it.
    • Comp a. Like Gunnar, and beavers…
    • Wasn't Westburg a 2nd round draft pick?  It's a little early to judge last year's draft.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...