Jump to content

HOF announcement in 5 minutes


Frobby

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

And don't forget what dWAR is: defensive runs above/below average, plus positional adjustment.  Jeter was a shortstop, so he got a positional adjustment of about +8 runs per season.  So he's about 83 runs worse than average over his career after you account for being a shortstop and getting a fudge factor of +8 runs per season.

+20 is a pretty epic defensive season.  Jeter had three different years where bb-ref lists him as -20 to -30 runs above average.  Minus 20.  Defensively he was the bizarro Ozzie Smith.

But Jeter threw out that runner at home in the playoffs against the A’s, so that cancels everything else out about his suspect defense. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding Jeter, I was being sarcastic. Yes he could hit. But shortstop is a defense first position. You want a guy who can defend.

One of the best lines I ever read over at Camden Chat, which is not full of good writers, was, I think, in a recap of an Oriole-Yankee game where I read the following description of an Oriole at-bat: “He hit a grounder to short, which is the same as saying ‘a single up the middle’...”

Oh, did that make me laugh, and it makes me laugh still.

Yes, he hit well enough to be in the Hall, but let’s not have any claptrap about him being the best of all time, or even good. He wasn’t, and only fools and Yankee fans think otherwise.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Philip said:

Regarding Jeter, I was being sarcastic. Yes he could hit. But shortstop is a defense first position. You want a guy who can defend.

One of the best lines I ever read over at Camden Chat, which is not full of good writers, was, I think, in a recap of an Oriole-Yankee game where I read the following description of an Oriole at-bat: “He hit a grounder to short, which is the same as saying ‘a single up the middle’...”

Oh, did that make me laugh, and it makes me laugh still.

Yes, he hit well enough to be in the Hall, but let’s not have any claptrap about him being the best of all time, or even good. He wasn’t, and only fools and Yankee fans think otherwise.

It’s ridiculous to say he wasn’t good.    He was an excellent player and his offense more than made up for his defense.    To be clear, his big problem on defense was limited range.    He was a relatively mistake free player.    It’s not like you watched Jeter and slapped your head over his defensive gaffes.    There were just a lot of balls that he couldn’t quite reach.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s ridiculous to say he wasn’t good.    He was an excellent player and his offense more than made up for his defense.    To be clear, his big problem on defense was limited range.    He was a relatively mistake free player.    It’s not like you watched Jeter and slapped your head over his defensive gaffes.    There were just a lot of balls that he couldn’t quite reach.    

Can’t make an error if you don’t get to the ball.

1j7rqt.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Honus was clearly the best shortstop of all time when compared to his peers, at least if you talk about a whole career in way that you exclude ARod and his half a career at third base.  And PEDs if care about such things.

But Honus played from 1897-1917.  The differences between 1897 or 1910 or 1920 baseball and today's are stark.  I could piece together a case that the best team in MLB in 1897 would struggle in the Eastern League today.  A fair bit of Honus' distance between him and average and him and replacement is the fact that an average or replacement level player of his day wouldn't even remotely be a major leaguer in 2019.  You have to at least consider that when calling someone from 120 years ago the greatest of all time.

But baseball evolved, in large part because of players like Wagner elevated the game to such a degree, that they set a new standard by which others were judged.  

Yes, it you simply teleported Richie Martin back to 1905, he would probably be an All-Star.

Didn't Ted Williams admit he wouldn't have hit .400 if he had to play in the league after 1960?

If you wanted to make the case of Ruth as the GOAT - his single season and career records have long since been eclipsed by more recent players.  And if he were to play today, he would in all probability be a Manny Ramirez power-only DH type, with 40ishHRS and .250 average, at best.. But at the time he was hitting more home runs, than many entire teams.  So he in essence paved the way for later guys like Mantle, Maris, Aaron, McGwire, Bonds and Sosa. 

 

Edited by GuidoSarducci
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, GuidoSarducci said:

But baseball evolved, in large part because of players like Wagner elevated the game to such a degree, that they set a new standard by which others were judged.  

Yes, it you simply teleported Richie Martin back to 1905, he would probably be an All-Star.

Didn't Ted Williams admit he wouldn't have hit .400 if he had to play in the league after 1960?

If you wanted to make the case of Ruth as the GOAT - his single season and career records have long since been eclipsed by more recent players.  And if he were to play today, he would in all probability be a Manny Ramirez power-only DH type, with 40ishHRS and .250 average, at best.. But at the time he was hitting more home runs, than many entire teams.  So he in essence paved the way for later guys like Mantle, Maris, Aaron, McGwire, Bonds and Sosa. 

 

Ty Cobb...In 1960, asked by a reporter towards the end of his life what he thought he would hit playing today and Cobb said  “Probably  around .290”   The reporter said “why so low?” and Cobb said “because I am 74 damn years old”. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
    • I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...