Jump to content

Predictions


mweb

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Losing a game because the QB is playing with a throwing hand injury can happen to anyone. I'm sorry, but I'm not giving you credit for your prediction last year due to the circumstances.

Well how is losing one along the way rolling through the Big Ten?

I see their season going about the way their season went last year... Although if Wells is out or not close to 100% they will lose to USC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see their season going about the way their season went last year... Although if Wells is out or not close to 100% they will lose to USC.

Ok, your bold prediction made it seem like they'd go undefeated and be left out.

Do you have Oklahoma and WVU going undefeated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, your bold prediction made it seem like they'd go undefeated and be left out.

Do you have Oklahoma and WVU going undefeated?

I think it's very likely that noone is undefeated... Although WVU almost has to be to have a shot. The teams most likely to beat them (other than Auburn) are too late in the year. My bold prediction is that OSU gets jumped by someone at the end of the year essentially to keep 'em out of the BCS title game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's very likely that noone is undefeated... Although WVU almost has to be to have a shot. The teams most likely to beat them (other than Auburn) are too late in the year. My bold prediction is that OSU gets jumped by someone at the end of the year essentially to keep 'em out of the BCS title game.

Well if they beat USC, and look good other than their one loss, I don't see why that would happen. Winning at USC would show they can play with anyone, regardless of speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say Gators over USC.

Haha Mweb, up you guys will be smoked by our lighning quick team. Heck even our quarterbacks are fast.

Florida could certainly beat USC, but it won't be because they have much of a speed advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all good. At least I didn't pick Clemson or Virginia Tech this year!! I'm already ahead of the game.

True, but your Big 10 love will fail you once again, this time it will just take two more weeks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...