Jump to content

How and when will MLB resume in 2020? Update: Owners Agree - Proposal Submitted to Union


PaulFolk

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, MongoBoy said:

Yes, there was.  But most was on VHS.  And I couldn't afford both a VHS player and Betamax at the same time, so I had to go from memory.

"My wife and I were we going to have sex last nite.  But we were too tired to think of anyone else."  Rodney Dangerfield

I had Betamax and at least where I was living it was plentiful in both format.

I thought betamax was the better machine, but lost out to VHS because of the longer tapes on VHS. Sony made money either way, as they had the patents for both. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

I had Betamax and at least where I was living it was plentiful in both format.

I thought betamax was the better machine, but lost out to VHS because of the longer tapes on VHS. Sony made money either way, as they had the patents for both. :)

They made sure they didn't lose round 2 when it came to the HD DVD players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They made sure they didn't lose round 2 when it came to the HD DVD players.

They sure didnt. Im on my 2nd Sony DVD machine, worn out the first one, these days, it doesnt get much use.

They make a pretty good flat screen too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MongoBoy said:

Yes, there was.  But most was on VHS.  And I couldn't afford both a VHS player and Betamax at the same time, so I had to go from memory.

"My wife and I were we going to have sex last nite.  But we were too tired to think of anyone else."  Rodney Dangerfield

Not to get too far off subject, but Sony's Betamax failed because they would not license anyone else to produce the player or tapes while JVC did allow for other companies to acquire a license to produce VHS. This flooded the market, which drove down the price. When you could get a VHS for $100 and a Betamax may cost 3x t0 4x that, that hurt sales even with the slightly better quality.

Also, the lower cost of producing VHS tapes did allow for the porn industry to pick it as the preferred method which was basically the death nail to Betamax.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Not to get too far off subject, but Sony's Betamax failed because they would not license anyone else to produce the player or tapes while JVC did allow for other companies to acquire a license to produce VHS. This flooded the market, which drove down the price. When you could get a VHS for $100 and a Betamax may cost 3x t0 4x that, that hurt sales even with the slightly better quality.

Also, the lower cost of producing VHS tapes did allow for the porn industry to pick it as the preferred method which was basically the death nail to Betamax.

 

I really wish we had sports to talk about, in order to stay on subject. ?

At this point, we dont even know when ST will start back up. (IF)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

They made sure they didn't lose round 2 when it came to the HD DVD players.

I bought, and still have, 2 of them.  I also have about 30 hd-dvd movies cause they came with the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

Not to get too far off subject, but Sony's Betamax failed because they would not license anyone else to produce the player or tapes while JVC did allow for other companies to acquire a license to produce VHS. This flooded the market, which drove down the price. When you could get a VHS for $100 and a Betamax may cost 3x t0 4x that, that hurt sales even with the slightly better quality.

Also, the lower cost of producing VHS tapes did allow for the porn industry to pick it as the preferred method which was basically the death nail to Betamax.

 

You are 100% correct. Betamax had superior picture quality, but Sony turned it into a niche product because they wouldn't license the technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Redskins Rick said:

I really wish we had sports to talk about, in order to stay on subject. ?

At this point, we dont even know when ST will start back up. (IF)

There's a lot of reports coming out each day to discuss. Today, for instance, it was reported that Taiwan is preparing to have live attendance at games (250 fans per game). Taiwan has been ahead of everyone, so I'm sure MLB and other leagues will be looking at the success of their actions as a blueprint for what could be possible here.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/05/taiwans-cpbl-preparing-for-live-attendance.html

Also, Scott Boras began advocating for a return of players to training camps as soon as possible. It sounds crazy at first, but makes some sense - starting now would allow teams to have players and staff return in staggered stages, instead of just having everyone come back at once.

https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2020/05/boras-calls-for-resumption-of-spring-training.html

There was also a rumor today that Opening Day would start on July 1 - but quickly confirmed to be false. While I doubt there is an official plan from MLB at this point, all of the reports recently have pointed to that timeframe as the leading consideration. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • She’s awful.  I wouldn’t take anything she says to mean anything. 
    • This Twitter thread is interesting. A lot of things track. I generally think she doesn’t know much but she does seem to know people around the team. She’s also been a Hyde defender.     
    • I feel like they did it to entice pitchers on short-term deals to come here and now have their stats blow up.
    • Here was the Wheeler extension from this past spring - he is finishing 2024 under the terms of his original 2020-2024 contract, so these are guarantees Middleton and Dombrowski made blind to whether Wheeler would hit any health bumps in 2024. Wheeler 5.30.1990 is 4 plus years older than Burnes 10.22.1994, but has a ton more October achievement, including 7 shutout innings this afternoon.    30 Swings and Misses!!! 3 years/$126M (2025-27) signed extension with Philadelphia 3/4/24 25:$42M, 26:$42M, 27:$42M
    • It wasn’t Cowser and Ortiz for Burnes..it was Cease.  And at that time, they did have to give that to get him, clearly. I never wanted to lose Urias for nothing. And yea, I wanted to trade some of our vets and play the kids…and put more emphasis on the pitching staff. I wanted Hays gone and wanted Mounty gone.   And it was definitely you but whatever. 
    • I don't remember those conversations.  I pegged them at 90-95 wins in the poll, so there's no way I wouldn't have believed they could win 88 games.  Which of course they didn't, even with the injuries and underperformance. The biggest thing I remember arguing with you about last off-season was that we didn't need to give Ortiz and Cowser up to get Burnes and it would be foolish to give up them both.  I specifically argued that we didn't need to trade Ortiz as we could find a place for him to play, specifically citing the likelihood of injury. I really think you're thinking about somebody else.  I'm also not sure why you think you were one of the voices arguing for "depth" as you were willing to lose Mateo and Urias for basically nothing, and they both contributed to this team and were a bulwark against injury/underperformance.  You were willing to trade Cowser and where would we have been without him? This team's performance this year was well within the boundaries of what I expected, if a bit on the lower end.  The only thing confusing to me about it was what happened to Rutschman. That said, my "confusion" is what is the best path forward.
    • I think he’s getting somewhere around $180 million
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...