Jump to content

Kjerstad comes in at #99 on BA Top 100


Sir_Loin

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Is it hard typing when you're hanging from a cross?  I'm assuming so.

At least I’m consistent.... you bitched about the draft the whole time it was going on. You proclaimed yourself a Rays or Marlins fan and done with the Orioles. Now suddenly without anything else happening you are on board with the decision making. 
 

Either you can’t make up your mind, you happened to be out of your medication during the draft, or you acted like you did fir attention.

Either way it’s pretty dam hypocritical to criticize my consistent position on Elias spending the number 2 pick on a guy that clearly wasn’t anywhere near the 2nd best player.

As I’ve also consistently mentioned, I wanted Martin and would’ve understood if they went with Lacy or even Hancock. 
 

So again, we selected him 2nd and they have 7 other draftees ranked ahead of him in the top 100. Again they reached in order to over spend in the 4th and 5th round. I get it! I just am totally against the strategy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

eye-roll-emoji-by-twitter.png

Don't folks get tired of the everyone is biased against Baltimore shtick?

 

 It’s what unites us.  I’m just happy I got enough of a rise out of you to warrant the jumbo emoji. 
 

But no I was being facetious. I think anywhere from 80-100 is about right for him at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

At least I’m consistent.... you bitched about the draft the whole time it was going on. You proclaimed yourself a Rays or Marlins fan and done with the Orioles. Now suddenly without anything else happening you are on board with the decision making. 
 

Either you can’t make up your mind, you happened to be out of your medication during the draft, or you acted like you did fir attention.

Either way it’s pretty dam hypocritical to criticize my consistent position on Elias spending the number 2 pick on a guy that clearly wasn’t anywhere near the 2nd best player.

As I’ve also consistently mentioned, I wanted Martin and would’ve understood if they went with Lacy or even Hancock. 
 

So again, we selected him 2nd and they have 7 other draftees ranked ahead of him in the top 100. Again they reached in order to over spend in the 4th and 5th round. I get it! I just am totally against the strategy. 

No man, I just kept an open mind.  Willing to look at logic, willing to understand the strategy behind the draft.  Willing to learn and admit that I could have been wrong.  Sure, I was pissed in the moment and some of that was hyperbole.  

Said it before, I'll say it again, I wanted Martin, too.  But I understand the philosophy behind the draft.  It might not be what I'd have done, but I understand the logic.  It's not bad.  

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, joelala said:

 It’s what unites us.  I’m just happy I got enough of a rise out of you to warrant the jumbo emoji. 
 

But no I was being facetious. I think anywhere from 80-100 is about right for him at this point.

I can find the jumbo one faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Everything I have seen is that he will be fine in RF and has a strong arm.  He probably isn’t going to be some elite defender but he won’t hurt you and his arm can make up for some issues.  RF isn’t that hard to play in OPACY and having a strong arm helps when you are playing balls off the scoreboard.

Still, he’s not getting a boost because of his defense.  Don’t think it hurts him but doesn’t help him either.  
 

But if a guy like Martin ends up at second and doesn’t hit for much power, he isn’t someone I would take at 2...I actually may have preferred Gonzalez over him...but again, that’s if you don’t think Martin sticks on the left side.  If he is an everyday player on the left side of the infield, the Os likely made a big mistake by not taking him.

Luke? Is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Martin even play any SS at Vandy?  According to this https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=martin004aus he's played 52 games at 3B, 13 at 2B, 12 at CF, 12 (more?) at OF, and 4 at 1B.  Based on that, it seems like a stretch and a half to think he's a SS prospect.  For all we know, he's a faster Mountcastle on defense.  No question he can hit and has a good eye, but 14 homers with 39 doubles and 4 triples in 665 plate appearances in college - that's ok, but to put him in the top 15 prospects in baseball - that's a reach, imo.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something I noticed is that Kjerstad is the highest rated switch-hitting prospect in the draft, and the only one that made the Fangraphs' numbers ranking / has an AV of 50 or better.

Adley Rutschman?  Switch hitter.

Imagine if those two pan out, having them back-to-back in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

Something I noticed is that Kjerstad is the highest rated switch-hitting prospect in the draft, and the only one that made the Fangraphs' numbers ranking / has an AV of 50 or better.

Adley Rutschman?  Switch hitter.

Imagine if those two pan out, having them back-to-back in the lineup.

Is he actually a switch hitter though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, if BA’s assessment is right that Martin is the no. 16 prospect in the minors,  I don’t think passing him over to save money for later rounds was a good move.   

Fangraphs has Martin at no. 52.    The move becomes much more defensible if that’s your assessment.    
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Oh, I thought you were taking about his hitting in high leverage situations. 
    • Frustrating sure, but boring is not what I would I say. We do steal bases at times. I would like for us to play more small ball sometimes and it is frustrating to see us be so homerun happy. I think with Westy back, we will see a resurgence of timely hitting as that is very contagious.   We saw that at the beginning of the year. Amazing sight to see for sure. I think the most disheartening thing that really shocked me is the apathy and outright disgust I’ve seen from O’s fans toward their team. Perhaps we have been spoiled? No idea. Maybe expectations were too high? No idea, but frankly, a lot of yall focusing on other things and simply not watching/posting would make next season a lot more enjoyable. This is the first time since 96-97 where we make the playoffs in back to back years and you guys have been acting like some real lame jerks this whole dang season. Frankly, yall should be ashamed of yourselves. We are an incredibly young team and with that come highs and lows, but yall don’t see that. You just love to complain and moan and bloviate. Where’s the heart? Where’s the loyalty? Where’s the gratitude? You’d think with all this team has overcome, especially being so young, y’all would be happy, but no. So go off on your little bike rides or whatever. Go watch a movie if this saga seems boring to you. I don’t care. Just for once this season, keep your immense negativity to yourself.
    • Really an amazing run, 4 straight years. I completely agree with the ranking, too. There's no way Kjerstad is still a prospect though, right? 45 days is the cutoff and he's played in 48 games.
    • i think we all are going to have ptsd from that 9th inning for a while,it was that brutally bad . they need to do some special to get us to forget about it
    • wow,did gunnar and adley have to do this last season? 
    • I suggested that earlier but I think it's probably a bad play with no out. The O's have like 85% probability of scoring. There is a huge downside risk of Mullins popping up the bunt for a double play. He could also whiff on the bunt making at least Holliday an easy out. With one out and only 65% probability of scoring it's a much better play. I think if Santander and Mullins were reversed in the lineup Hyde may have done it but not when you have two shots to get the run in. 
    • WE GOT US ONE - JD5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...