Jump to content

Roch on the OF situation


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Just now, eddie83 said:

I don’t think this is an issue until Diaz is ready. They can explore what they have in Mountcastle. No need to make a decision now. As others have said Mullins is more of a bench player. I would not deal Santander myself. Switch hitters with his skill set are not easy to find. Do I think he is a lock to be good?, no but he has a chance. Mancini doesn’t even play into this, he was a 1B who played OF due to need. 

A creative manager using DH can give all these guys at bats next year. Nunez could be moved as well it needed.  

Diaz is ready imo.  I think the team knows it but no where to put him right now.

We have to wait and see on Mancini but I do think we need 2 of Davis, Nunez and Santander gone after the season.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

If he was going to be the first baseman next year, he would be the first baseman now. He is going to have every opportunity to succeed or fail as a left-fielder.

The belief that he should be declared not a left-fielder at this point is not a widely held belief, in fact as far as I know, it is only held by you.

You don't move young players to easier defensive positions until you have to. Maximizing your defensive efficiency in the short term is secondary to maximizing Mountcastle's long-term value to the team.

Having extra outfielders is a luxury that is not best solved by moving the youngest, most valuable outfielder to a less valuable, more easy to fill position.

Stop that. Go back to my comment. Read what I said. I’ll help if you stumble on the big words. You’re making a claim I did not make.

I mentioned a couple of bad plays and could have mentioned at least one more.

I won’t repeat the whole thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weams said:

Not that I've ever observed. 

1.  I said the O's were probably a .500 team  when many were saying that they were a last place team trying for a #1 draft choice.  People have come my way.

2. I said Mullins could play CF and would probably hit when many were stuck thinking for him as the guy who could not could not hit at AAA last year.  People are agreeing more and more with me.

3. I was in Valaika's corner before most.  People see his value more now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

 

Having extra outfielders is a luxury that is not best solved by moving the youngest, most valuable outfielder to a less valuable, more easy to fill position.

Mc is most certainly not our most valuable OF. He MAY be our most valuable bat, but that’s a different thing. Santander is our most valuable current OF, and Hays probably would be if he could stay on the field. As I said, staying in Left is fine, so long as his bat continues to carry his glove.
If we have too many outfielders, you trade the superfluous if possible, and shuffle the others as necessary. That’s not a controversial comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

1.  I said the O's were probably a .500 team  when many were saying that they were a last place team trying for a #1 draft choice.  People have come my way.

2. I said Mullins could play CF and would probably hit when many were stuck thinking for him as the guy who could not could not hit at AAA last year.  People are agreeing more and more with me.

3. I was in Valaika's corner before most.  People see his value more now.

SSS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Philip said:

Mc is most certainly not our most valuable OF. He MAY be our most valuable bat, but that’s a different thing. Santander is our most valuable current OF, and Hays probably would be if he could stay on the field. As I said, staying in Left is fine, so long as his bat continues to carry his glove.
If we have too many outfielders, you trade the superfluous if possible, and shuffle the others as necessary. That’s not a controversial comment.

I'm not convinced that Santander is a much stronger defensive outfielder than Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

Mc is most certainly not our most valuable OF. He MAY be our most valuable bat, but that’s a different thing. Santander is our most valuable current OF, and Hays probably would be if he could stay on the field. As I said, staying in Left is fine, so long as his bat continues to carry his glove.
If we have too many outfielders, you trade the superfluous if possible, and shuffle the others as necessary. That’s not a controversial comment.

Mountcastle, .9 rWAR in 19 games, 74 PA

Santander, 1.3 rWAR in 37 games, 165 PA.

Mountcastle is younger.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Diaz is ready imo.  I think the team knows it but no where to put him right now.

We have to wait and see on Mancini but I do think we need 2 of Davis, Nunez and Santander gone after the season.  

The first two of those three aren’t hard decisions. If the NL keeps DH Nunez can be moved easier. I know Kjerstad is coming soon also. 

I wanted to see Mountcastle in LF, that said he still may wind up at 1B. I think you can still make some harder calls later on here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Philip said:

Stop that. Go back to my comment. Read what I said. I’ll help if you stumble on the big words. You’re making a claim I did not make.

I mentioned a couple of bad plays and could have mentioned at least one more.

I won’t repeat the whole thing. 

???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Philip said:

Who do we have who has meaningful trade value?

Mancini. Not that I think we will get an MLB ready 3B for him but I expect we will trade him and Nunez before next year's deadline. Stewart can take Nunez' DH spot as long as his bat plays, leaving Mountcastle, Hays, and Santander in the OF with Mullins as 4th OF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, weams said:

I think you have to evaluate over a longer period than 20 games. 

I’m not saying anything against Mountcastle, I’m just saying that Santandar certainly has a long enough track record to give him credit for all the good things he does, And look accurately at the things he doesn’t do as well as we would like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like DJ Stewart is likely to be traded.  He reminds me of a better Jack Cust.  He is close to a 3 outcomes hitter, homers, walks and lots of strikeouts.  I could see him putting up a .220, 40 HR, 200 K year, but I could also see him out of baseball in 2 years.  What's his trade value relative to Nunez>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • They are a bunch of simp libtards now, you'd fit in well
    • Trade for trout while his is stock is low. Bit of a gamble, but he's a leader that needs a change of scenery. He is our RF/ DH middle of the order RH bat to replace santander  If we can keep him healthy, he might be the veteran presence we need. We have the salary space for his contract 
    • I'm rooting against the Yankees this weekend. Hasn't gotten close to that point for me. The 2016 WC game was the worst because of the Britton situation. The 2014 Royals series was awful. I don't know that this loss was even as bad as last year's vs the Rangers where it felt like we could go all the way. This was just a wild card team vs a wild card team that could go either way, and some bounces didn't go our way and young players couldn't handle the pressure. It's best-of-3, it happens.
    • I'm older than most here. The pain of being a sports fan in Baltimore in 1969 make this year's playoff sweep seem trivial. All three of our local pro teams had great regular seasons. The Colts were a sure thing to beat the upstart Jets in Super Bowl III. No way the mighty Orioles would lose to the Mets in the World Series. And I thought for sure the Bullets might beat the Knicks in the NBA semifinals. Talk about long lasting pain ...
    • Come on man, that's a crock. I've been as frustrated as anyone watching Adley's approach at the plate and his uppercut swing. But to say he's the kind of guy that makes excuses is way out of line. I have no doubt Adley will work on getting his body, swing and mind right in the off-season. 
    • I was given three free tix to see them in Durham in '23. They oversold the tix, ie. the seats were not assigned, first come / first serve,  the line to get in was ridiculously long, and we had to stand in the miserable heat and humidity of a NC summer.  Worst baseball in person experience of my life. Just goofy from the little I got to see in the three person deep standing room only crowd. We left after three innings or whatever they call it in their version of the game. Way too loud, too. Just too much BS going on. It was like the baseball version of drinking WAY too much gin and fruit punch and the wild colors give you the bed spins. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...