Jump to content

O's vs Braves, rubber match


SteveA

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, SteveA said:

We don't know that.  We just know that when he was first promoted he went several days without pitching and then only came in in a mopup situation.  There was speculation on here that Hyde "didn't want" to use him in a high leverage situations.  But that was assumption based on his usage.  I don't think there was ever a quote of Hyde's to that affect.

 

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I think he said 1-2 things but I always take that stuff with a grain of salt.   

From August 28:

“For us right now, Keegan fits in our bullpen the best,” Hyde said today in his Zoom conference call with the media.

“I might not even use him as a long guy. I might use him as a one-inning guy here, too. But I think that long-term, is he a rotation piece? Is he a long guy? I think that’s something we will find out. But at this moment right now I’m going to try to win games and utilize Keegan the best way we can.”

https://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2020/08/akin-likely-to-stay-in-the-bullpen-and-other-notes.html

Three days later, Akin started a game.    Of course, Tommy Milone had been traded in the interim   

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteveA said:

John Parrish, Dave Ford, and Sammy Stewart all Kd a bunch in their debut games, I believe.

For any rookie?  No idea but I'll bet someone like Moose or Palmer or McNally hit double digits as a rookie.

Mussina struck out 10 in his 3rd major league game.  Not sure if that’s our record.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Mussina struck out 10 in his 3rd major league game.  Not sure if that’s our record.   

Nope.   I just figured out that Mike Boddicker struck out 12 in 1983.   He was still a rookie though he’d also gotten into games in 1980, 1981 and 1982.  

There could be someone who topped Boddicker, but I’m not going to spend any more time looking.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SteveA said:

We don't know that.  We just know that when he was first promoted he went several days without pitching and then only came in in a mopup situation.  There was speculation on here that Hyde "didn't want" to use him in a high leverage situations.  But that was assumption based on his usage.  I don't think there was ever a quote of Hyde's to that affect.

Well I said I wasn’t sure I remembered correctly, and I know he bounced up-down-back up with only a coup relief innings to show for it, but I thought Hyde said he’d be used in relief.

regardless, I’m glad he’s where he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

At one point, Akin retired 11 consecutive batters before Austin Riley reached on an infield single in the 5th inning.

At one point, Akin threw 14 consecutive Strikes.

Not a single Braves base-runner went beyond 2nd base while Akin was in the game.

 

 

15 OUTS: )  9 Strikeouts, 2 Foulouts, 2 Flyouts, 2 Lineouts

 

 

KEEGAN LEE AKIN )))))))) (FINAL NUMBERS)

IP:lll5 

H:lllll.3 ) l(3 Singles)

R:llll 0

BB:ll1

SO:ll9

Pitches: l) 93 )(63)Strikes, )30)Balls)

2020 ERA: l) 3.38 )  18.67 IP  (7 ER) 

2020 WHIP: l)  1.232  )  18.67 IP  (23 H/BB) 

2020 OPPONENTS BATTING AVG: l)  .200  )(14 for 70)   

 

PITCHES BY INNING  

*******************  

25  ll(15 l.Strikes, ll10 lllBalls)

12  lll(10 llStrikes, llll21 llBalls)

16  lll(11 llStrikes, llll51 llBalls)

16  lll(11 llStrikes, llll51 llBalls)

24  lll(16 llStrikes, lllll81lllBalls) )

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what Freeman's total time base to base was on that trip around - he only passed jog on the 2nd to 3rd bit.

Skimmed Bedard's game log for rookie peaks and he maxed out at 10.

Iglesias capitalizes on the Tomlin BP routine to get to 48-for-126 on the year.

Ben just dropped a wonderful tidbit I never knew that he and Albert Belle were LSU teammates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Nope.   I just figured out that Mike Boddicker struck out 12 in 1983.   He was still a rookie though he’d also gotten into games in 1980, 1981 and 1982.  

There could be someone who topped Boddicker, but I’m not going to spend any more time looking.   
 

I can't say but Roch had this:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...