Jump to content

SANTANDER is a super two


weams

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

In your mind.   I will be very surprised if he’s dealt.   

There’s a good chance his value will never be higher than it is this off season. Considering Santander is likely not a piece you build around and Elias has shown a penchant to trade/release players even when it’s unpopular I think there is a chance he’s dealt. If I had to guess then I think it happens at the trade deadline or next off season but it certainly wouldn’t be surprising to me to see him traded now. It’s not like the roster isn’t overflowing with outfielders anyways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, oriole said:

There’s a good chance his value will never be higher than it is this off season. Considering Santander is likely not a piece you build around and Elias has shown a penchant to trade/release players even when it’s unpopular I think there is a chance he’s dealt. If I had to guess then I think it happens at the trade deadline or next off season but it certainly wouldn’t be surprising to me to see him traded now. It’s not like the roster isn’t overflowing with outfielders anyways. 

Let me ask you, who among the current Orioles are a piece you build around? Just trying to understand the type of player you think will be around?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

I didn’t mean this offseason..but I would be surprised if he is on the team by Aug 2022.

This makes him more expensive, which is even more incentive for them to deal him.

I can’t deny that being a Super 2 means he’ll be more expensive than if he wasn’t.   But there really was no doubt he’d be a Super 2 coming into this season.    

I think there’s a decent chance Santander is gone by August 2022, but I wouldn’t say it’s a certainty.    Lots of things will happen between now and then that will affect that.  In addition to Santander’s play and his health, the development of Diaz and Kjerstad and the competitive position of the team will be determinants.  
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn’t this just mean the Os have control over him for an extra year?

And his cost will be dependent on his performance? Seems to me it would make him more valuable, but only if he continues to improve,  which makes it LESS desirable to move him now because we’d be selling low.

I was thinking his peak would be during his second year of arbitration. 2021 is his last Pre-Arb year, so deadline 2022 might be the best time?

And I am confident he will be part of our next good team but that shouldn’t have any bearing on whether or not to trade him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Making him more likely to be dealt.

 

4 hours ago, Frobby said:

In your mind.   I will be very surprised if he’s dealt.   

He's at the top of my (mildly informed) list. We have a logjam with even more OF help coming, and besides maybe Trey he's the most valuable in trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Philip said:

Doesn’t this just mean the Os have control over him for an extra year?

And his cost will be dependent on his performance? Seems to me it would make him more valuable, but only if he continues to improve,  which makes it LESS desirable to move him now because we’d be selling low.

I was thinking his peak would be during his second year of arbitration. 2021 is his last Pre-Arb year, so deadline 2022 might be the best time?

And I am confident he will be part of our next good team but that shouldn’t have any bearing on whether or not to trade him.

Not necessarily. Even if he sucks he will get a small raise, and he's not going to suck. He's going to get significant raises every year and now this is one more year.

 

The team could sign him to a long term, team friendly deal... NOW would be the time. For "Tony" a bird in the hand...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

Doesn’t this just mean the Os have control over him for an extra year?

And his cost will be dependent on his performance? Seems to me it would make him more valuable, but only if he continues to improve,  which makes it LESS desirable to move him now because we’d be selling low.

I was thinking his peak would be during his second year of arbitration. 2021 is his last Pre-Arb year, so deadline 2022 might be the best time?

And I am confident he will be part of our next good team but that shouldn’t have any bearing on whether or not to trade him.

No, they don’t control him for an extra year.  It just means he gets expensive earlier.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...