Jump to content

What are the odds and when?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

What are the odds the O's will add:

A starting Shortstop?  

I would guess about 75%.   If Galvis salary falls to 3M I think they will.  But he could sign elsewhere.  The O's could sign other SS but will they be better than Sanchez or Martin?  I think that is questionable.  When?  I think the ST does not begin until April 1st, so I think prices fall in mid to late Feb.

A veteran Starter?   

I would guess the odds are 99.68% the O's will add a starter.  Probably on a minor league contract with an invite  to ST.    When? Late Jan or in Feb.

Will the O's bring back Alberto?

I would guess 50%.   Elias says he wants him back but on the teams terms.   That may be a minor league contract with a 1m to 1.5m salary if he makes the team.   Alberto has value as a platoon player vs lefties.   He could platoon at 3B  and backup 2B.   The 50% is because some another team may sign him to a better contract.  When?  Late Jan or Feb.

What do you think the odds are the O's add these or other players?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they’ll add someone to compete for the SS job, but the player(a) may not be the presumptive starter like Iglesias was.   

I’m a bit pessimistic about Galvis falling into our price range.   He commanded 2/$9 mm two years ago and put up two pretty solid seasons.    I’d think he’d be worth at least 1/$4 mm or 2/$7 mm to some team this time around.   But we’ll see.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m sure they will add some guys in the areas mentioned but does it matter?

They aren’t likely to add anyone that is good and I don’t really see the point.

The team will be just as good with Martin or McCoy at SS as they will with anyone they will sign and while they could use a 5th starter in the early part of the year, that starter likely isn’t going to be much better than if you just throw Zimmerman, Wells or Lowther out there.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m sure they will add some guys in the areas mentioned but does it matter?

They aren’t likely to add anyone that is good and I don’t really see the point.

The team will be just as good with Martin or McCoy at SS as they will with anyone they will sign and while they could use a 5th starter in the early part of the year, that starter likely isn’t going to be much better than if you just throw Zimmerman, Wells or Lowther out there.

It’s absurd to think the O’s couldn’t find someone better than Martin or McCoy.   They certainly did last year.   I’m hoping the 2021 version of Martin is better than the sub-replacement level 2019 version, but that’s just based on pure hope, not evidence.   

Will the O’s be a bad team either way?    Sure.   But there’s a difference between bad and uncompetitive.   
 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It’s absurd to think the O’s couldn’t find someone better than Martin or McCoy.   They certainly did last year.   I’m hoping the 2021 version of Martin is better than the sub-replacement level 2019 version, but that’s just based on pure hope, not evidence.   

Will the O’s be a bad team either way?    Sure.   But there’s a difference between bad and uncompetitive.   
 

They easily COULD find someone better. The question is will they?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
    • Not bad, but Mullins needs to be at Centerfield for his range, glove, and defensive ability. Top teir premium defense cannot be underestimated. Kjerstad will be on the bench. I think the question is whether Slater or Cowser plays. I would prefer Ramirez over Slater if they need another right handed bat. Sig needs to look at Adleys recent sample sizes vs LHP before making him DH. McCann is catching for Burnes and hitting the left handed pitcher. He's also on a hot streak.
    • I’m slightly (irrationally, I admit, there’s no factual basis for what I’m about to say) worried that Gunnar is going to view this as the “Gunnar vs. Bobby” show and press hard at the plate and in the field leading to bad at bats and unforced errors. 
    • Sounds like getting your heart broken by big league ballplayers is a personal problem. Learn and adjust accordingly. These guys usually aren’t trying to be role models and he played in an era where a lot of players were on the gas. Was I surprised? Yeah, a little bit.  No one likes to admit Jose Canseco was the most honest one up there that day and was telling the truth the entire time.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...