Jump to content

Update: Orioles sign 17 international players highlighted by Basallo and Hernandez


connja

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

If Coby Mayo had signed for slot (565K) would Tony have ranked him #15 in the prospect list?

No because Mayo likely wouldn’t have the ceiling he apparently has if he signed for slot.

Mayo is nothing more than an Intl FA.  Maybe a little easier to scout him and we likely know more about him but overall, that’s really all he is at this point.  
 

He also has some degree of leverage because he could go to college, so he is able to influence his ability to get over slot a little more.  
 

But at the end of the day, you are assuming his frame fills out more and that with better coaching, better competition, etc...that he will continue to elevate his game.  It’s the same assumption you make with a 16-18 y/o player from the DR.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DoobyDoo said:

So this year they are going with the less is more approach.  I’m good with that if the evaluations say, this is the best course of action.  Maybe it’s more of a top heavy class and there aren’t a lot of guys worth signing that are 5 figure type guys.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"This group of 13 players will eat up the bulk of the club’s international bonus pool of $5,889,600. The club may have only about $100,000 remaining. The Orioles were placed with a group of seven other teams in getting this amount of pool money. Six teams got the highest amounts of $6,431,000. And while the O’s have few remaining dollars to sign international amateurs in a signing period that will run through Dec. 15, 2021, they got some of their top targets and the club will have signed 64 players under Elias/Perez and their staff when this class is announced."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

So this year they are going with the less is more approach.  I’m good with that if the evaluations say, this is the best course of action.  Maybe it’s more of a top heavy class and there aren’t a lot of guys worth signing that are 5 figure type guys.  

So apparently Elias’ agrees with me...fewer players with bigger bonuses , no.?
 

Quote


The Orioles continue to make some huge strides in their pursuit of international amateur talent. A class of what would eventually be 44 players was added in the signing period that began July 2, 2019 and ended in October. The Orioles will sign fewer players in the coming class, but were involved with many more players commanding bigger signing bonuses.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Absltgreek said:

"This group of 13 players will eat up the bulk of the club’s international bonus pool of $5,889,600. The club may have only about $100,000 remaining. The Orioles were placed with a group of seven other teams in getting this amount of pool money. Six teams got the highest amounts of $6,431,000. And while the O’s have few remaining dollars to sign international amateurs in a signing period that will run through Dec. 15, 2021, they got some of their top targets and the club will have signed 64 players under Elias/Perez and their staff when this class is announced."

Sounds like they have pretty much caught up to other teams.

Next step, passing other teams.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

So apparently Elias’ agrees with me...fewer players with bigger bonuses , no.?
 

 

He agrees that this is the way to go this year.  The philosophy will change year to year depending on the talent available I’m sure.  There may even be a year where they can get a Dominguez type guy and he costs almost everything in your pool, so they say it’s worth it.  

Im sure he doesn’t agree that they should spend poorly and irresponsibly like you have suggested.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He agrees that this is the way to go this year.  The philosophy will change year to year depending on the talent available I’m sure.  There may even be a year where they can get a Dominguez type guy and he costs almost everything in your pool, so they say it’s worth it.  

Im sure he doesn’t agree that they should spend poorly and irresponsibly like you have suggested.

 

The question is what is poorly and irresponsibly?

To me if you have X dollars unspent in your pool you have three main choices.

  1. Trade the slots for organizational filler
  2. Let it rot
  3. Overpay for players

I'd rather they overpay for players since I've seen no evidence that money saved is invested in the team instead of simply pocketed by ownership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

The question is what is poorly and irresponsibly?

To me if you have X dollars unspent in your pool you have three main choices.

  1. Trade the slots for organizational filler
  2. Let it rot
  3. Overpay for players

I'd rather they overpay for players since I've seen no evidence that money saved is invested in the team instead of simply pocketed by ownership.

Well you can’t trade this year.

Poorly and irresponsible is paying 1M over market just so you can say you get a top ranked guy.  That is what Roll Tide has advocated.  That is not only paying the player too much (in comparison to market rate) but it also greatly reduces your ability to sign other guys.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well you can’t trade this year.

Poorly and irresponsible is paying 1M over market just so you can say you get a top ranked guy.  That is what Roll Tide has advocated.  That is not only paying the player too much (in comparison to market rate) but it also greatly reduces your ability to sign other guys.

I was giving my take not his take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this class sounds pretty promising.    You can’t really judge a class based on what players got paid, but it looks as if we were very competitive.    Pending seeing the actual on field results, I’m really pleased with the progress Elias and Perez have made.    And, I feel like going forward we are no longer at any disadvantage.    Only time will tell if we meet our goal of excelling in this area, but I feel we’ve got a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Put the names and related info from article into list form....feel free to update as more info becomes available:

  1. Samuel Basallo (16) - Catcher - DR - $1.3mm;  Basallo, who turned 16 on Aug. 13, has some raw power and an arm that gets some 60 grades from scouts. But he is a big catcher already at 6-foot-3 and 198 lbs. and could outgrow the catching position. A lefty batter, he was once linked to the Yankees.
  2. Maikol Hernandez (17) SS - Venezuela - $1.2mm; Hernandez is 6-foot-4 and 175 lbs., and has several impressive tools with a strong arm and power. He’s drawn some comparisons to bigger shortstops at young ages like Carlos Correa and Manny Machado. He is considered a plus runner with a strong arm and power. He was previously linked to the Cardinals and Pirates.
  3. Wilmer Feliciano (16) OF -  DR - $300-400K; He is a 6-foot-2 lefty batter with power and is expected to get the club’s third-highest bonus in this class.
  4. Teudis Cortorreal  (16) OF/CF - DR- $300-400K;  a player with power potential
  5. Victor Celedonio (16) - SS - DR- $300-400K; a switch-hitter.
  6. Eruviel Castillo (16) - SS - DR- $300-400K;
  7. Anderson De Lo Santos (16) - SS - DR- $300-400K;
  8. Yasmil Bucce (16) C - Venezuela- $300-400K; a solid hitting prospect.
  9. Angel Tejada (16) SS -  DR - $200K;
  10. Aneudis Mordan (16) C - DR - $200K;
  11. Junior Lara (16) CF - DR - > $200K;
  12. Angel Pena (16) CF - DR - >$200K;  
  13. Daivy Cruz (16) LHP - Venezuela - >$200K
  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • the question isn’t about being able to make the offers, it’s about being awarded compensatory picks for more than one.
    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...