Jump to content

Way too early but concerns


eddie83

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, LA2 said:

I was impressed by Galvis' bat control on his deliberately restrained oppo RBI-single last night (but not by his other ABs, for sure). He's got a track record and so I haven't given up hope. Would you prefer Valaika there everyday?

Nah, he is a fine place holder, but he is a 31 year-old glove first shortstop. His presence helps the pitchers and whatever he does with the bat is a bonus. Valaika also is who he is, hopefully we will have a young shortstop to get excited about sometime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pushmonkey said:

I have concerns about the manager.  

Yeah, I get that...long term.  But I don't have concerns that he isn't ok for this developmental stage.  If he develops into a keeper fine.  If not move him.  That really shouldn't be a big concern.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, foxfield said:

Yeah, I get that...long term.  But I don't have concerns that he isn't ok for this developmental stage.  If he develops into a keeper fine.  If not move him.  That really shouldn't be a big concern.  

But is he developing the players?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, foxfield said:

Yeah, I get that...long term.  But I don't have concerns that he isn't ok for this developmental stage.  If he develops into a keeper fine.  If not move him.  That really shouldn't be a big concern.  

It's super early but it seems to me the team isn't playing with the same intensity they did last year.  It's probably observer error but I'll throw it out there.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is lagging at the ML 

5 minutes ago, Pushmonkey said:

But is he developing the players?

Im not really arguing...just idk.  I don't know anyone on the ML level who is lagging seriously behind.  This is really going to be the first year we have guys up who may be part of the future. I think this is the first year that is important to his future, I will put it that way, but I don't think he will be measured with wins/losses.  Im just saying so far, there isn't really evidence to say he is failing at that.....and in fairness you didn't call him a failure you said you were concerned.  I guess Im saying I am too but will wait till the end of this year to really measure.

edit to add:

And going forward points like CoC above will bear watching.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, foxfield said:

Who is lagging at the ML 

Im not really arguing...just idk.  I don't know anyone on the ML level who is lagging seriously behind.  This is really going to be the first year we have guys up who may be part of the future. I think this is the first year that is important to his future, I will put it that way, but I don't think he will be measured with wins/losses.  Im just saying so far, there isn't really evidence to say he is failing at that.....and in fairness you didn't call him a failure you said you were concerned.  I guess Im saying I am too but will wait till the end of this year to really measure.

I agree not on win/loss. See mental errors and lack of intensity is what concerns me. The 10ks 9 straight games, errors galore etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Letting Hanser Alberto go looks even worse than it did at the time.  The offense from the infield other than Mancini (I think he bounces back) looks pathetic.  Meanwhile Hanser is batting .308 for the Royals.  Once pitchers get to the back end of our lineup, they have it easy. 

Why keep a pretty good player around if you have an inferior alternative who isn't eligible yet for salary arbitration?   

This team's motto for this season might as well be "Lose as many games as possible, for as little salary as possible".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Three Run Homer said:

Why keep a pretty good player around if you have an inferior alternative who isn't eligible yet for salary arbitration?   

This team's motto for this season might as well be "Lose as many games as possible, for as little salary as possible".

Too wordy, won't fit on a banner.

How about Lose more, Pay less? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Letting Hanser Alberto go looks even worse than it did at the time.  The offense from the infield other than Mancini (I think he bounces back) looks pathetic.  Meanwhile Hanser is batting .308 for the Royals.  Once pitchers get to the back end of our lineup, they have it easy. 

I'm starting to be surprised anyone thinks Elias can evaluate talent.  It seems to be his biggest blind spot.  The defense on this team has gone backwards, the best parts of the major league team 3 years in are still products of the last leadership group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...