Jump to content

Austin Wynns in Baltimore per Roch


rm5678

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Philip said:

I was wondering which move I wanted to see: dumping Severino, dumping Sisco, or just optioning Sisco. I wanted to dump both but that wasn’t an option.

Failing that, I wanted to dump somebody. Not option but send away, far away, where we’d never see them again and could pretend this unpleasantness was just a bad dream.

This is not the best outcome. But it’s sure better than the way things were yesterday.

 

So glad you have zero say in transactions with the team.  The idea that you think we should have cut Sisco when he has an option available is absurd.

You are the guy at the poker table where everyone checks and you fold even though you can still get a free card.  

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I would have preferred a focus on defense. Wynns is not the best defender among the available options and he doesn’t hit well. I’m sure he’s an improvement but a defense-first catcher would have been more significant.

Why are the guys only focusing on offense? Sisco isn’t hitting as well as Severino so he’s the one who goes, without consideration of defense? And Wynns only comes up because he’s been hitting well on the farm?

Besides Rutcschman, who would be a better defensive option than Wynns???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I would have preferred a focus on defense. Wynns is not the best defender among the available options and he doesn’t hit well. I’m sure he’s an improvement but a defense-first catcher would have been more significant.

Why are the guys only focusing on offense? Sisco isn’t hitting as well as Severino so he’s the one who goes, without consideration of defense? And Wynns only comes up because he’s been hitting well on the farm?

Who's the best available defensive catcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I would have preferred a focus on defense. Wynns is not the best defender among the available options and he doesn’t hit well. I’m sure he’s an improvement but a defense-first catcher would have been more significant.

Why are the guys only focusing on offense? Sisco isn’t hitting as well as Severino so he’s the one who goes, without consideration of defense? And Wynns only comes up because he’s been hitting well on the farm?

What makes you say Wynns was not the best option defensively?    He’s got a better defensive reputation than Cumberland.   I think he’s supposed to be decent back there.  

Honestly, I refuse to invest any emotional energy on this subject.   We all know what the long term solution is at catcher.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What makes you say Wynns was not the best option defensively?    He’s got a better defensive reputation than Cumberland.   I think he’s supposed to be decent back there.  

Honestly, I refuse to invest any emotional energy on this subject.   We all know what the long term solution is at catcher.   
 

I think the question then becomes...

 

Who is the backup? There is a lot to like about Handley and Cannon in the lower levels. But they won’t be up for a bit either, probably not when Adley spends his first season or two, as long as they keep progressing and don’t slump out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

I think the question then becomes...

 

Who is the backup? There is a lot to like about Handley and Cannon in the lower levels. But they won’t be up for a bit either, probably not when Adley spends his first season or two, as long as they keep progressing and don’t slump out.

Fair point.   Once Adley is up I think we’ll be more in a true starter/back-up split with Adley getting 75% of the reps, unlike now where it’s been more like 65/35.    So, the role of the second catcher will be less important.   Maybe Wynns will show he can handle that.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

So glad you have zero say in transactions with the team.  The idea that you think we should have cut Sisco when he has an option available is absurd.

You are the guy at the poker table where everyone checks and you fold even though you can still a free card.  

He must be your nephew or some thing, he’s terrible, he has given no sign that he will ever not be terrible. I am quite happy to keep him around, but I am also quite happy to send him on his way.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

Besides Rutcschman, who would be a better defensive option than Wynns???

I don’t know, I’m happy to have him here my point was that he was probably promoted because he’s hitting very well at the moment and not because he is outstanding defensively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philip said:

I don’t know, I’m happy to have him here my point was that he was probably promoted because he’s hitting very well at the moment and not because he is outstanding defensively.

Honestly I don't know about that.   He has a reputation as a decent defensive C, definitely better than the two guys we had up here.   That might be as big a part of his promotion as the good 4 week start with the bat, given the lack of hitting throughout most of his minor league career.   I doubt the Orioles expect him to hit much, but they do expect he will be better behind the plate than what we have seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

What makes you say Wynns was not the best option defensively?    He’s got a better defensive reputation than Cumberland.   I think he’s supposed to be decent back there.  

Honestly, I refuse to invest any emotional energy on this subject.   We all know what the long term solution is at catcher.   
 

I like him, please don’t misunderstand me I’m not suggesting that he’s not the best available to fender, I don’t know whether that’s true or not, I was just saying and perhaps I should’ve made it clear for all the people here, That he was probably promoted because he was hitting best

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Honestly I don't know about that.   He has a reputation as a decent defensive C, definitely better than the two guys we had up here.   That might be as big a part of his promotion as the good 4 week start with the bat, given the lack of hitting throughout most of his minor league career.   I doubt the Orioles expect him to hit much, but they do expect he will be better behind the plate than what we have seen.

Yes that’s exactly my expectation. SUPERIOR defense and as good or better offense. What I’ve been clamoring for for a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Philip said:

Yes that’s exactly my expectation. SUPERIOR defense and as good or better offense. What I’ve been clamoring for for a long time.

Wynns MLB career OPS is .610.   DOn't expect much on the offense.  Although it won't be hard to improve on Sisco's .431 this year so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SteveA said:

Wynns MLB career OPS is .610.   DOn't expect much on the offense.  Although it won't be hard to improve on Sisco's .431 this year so far.

Yes that’s why I said,” as good or better.”

Im pretty sure most warm bodied humans could do as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • In your retirement you stay up too late and worry too much.  
    • If you want style points, watch figure skating. A bloop hit looks the same as a line drive hit in the box score. A win is a win.
    • Every time we get a pitcher from the A’s this time of year, I think they are still doing us a solid for trading them Pat Neshek for cash in 2012.
    • I understand why you'd be concerned with Webb's performance but that contract is so juicy that I'd jump on him if he were available.  4/82 plus the remainder of his salary this year is a steal for him, even accounting for the fact that pitcher arb awards have been weirdly low.
    • Great to get a 2-0 win facing George Kirby, but man they made it way harder than it had to be. Grayson gets staked to a 1-0 lead in the top of the 4th, then walks 2 of the first 3 batters he faces in the bottom of the inning.  Fortunately, erased on a DP. The O’s score an insurance run in the 7th, but then can’t capitalize on a bases loaded, one out situation with Gunnar and Adley up.   In the bottom half, Grayson allows a single and puts the tying run on via a walk, then makes a poor throw on an easy DP comebacker that could have loaded the bases but Gunnar somehow got a barehand grip on the ball with his foot on the bag.   In the 8th, O’Hearn leads off with a double but the O’s failed to advance him. In the 9th, Kimbrel hits a guy, almost allows a game-tying homer that goes just foul, then hits another guy, and the baserunners both get into scoring position but Kimbrel is able to end it on a strikeout.    I’m thrilled they won, but man they made it gut-wrenching.   
    • 1: A lot of posters here actually have an milb.tv subscription and use it, or they attend games in person.  So you're off base if you think the prevailing opinion here is based on a few social media posts. 2: Henderson doesn't have a famous dad, and Holliday outproduced him at a younger age in the minors, and people here were about equally hyped about Henderson. 3: Holliday put up a 1.000+ OPS in AA as a 19 year old.  AA is harder than power-5 division 1 college baseball.  That's basically like a freshman putting up 25/10/5.  Not 4 points a game.  Get outta here with your terrible Bronny James comparisons.  If people here were actually blinded by a last name then posters here would have thought that Ryan Ripken was a legitimate prospect.  Believe it or not some of us actually do research on things like this.  We certainly aren't alone in rating Holliday highly, as he was rated #1 or #2 overall by every publication I can think of (and #1 by most of them if I recall.) 4: Holliday for Miller, who isn't guaranteed to be healthy enough to be in the starting rotation over the course of his controlled years, is a ludicrous trade proposal and I'm glad you're not our GM.  You're trading Holliday for an ace.  And not just any ace, an ace without injury concerns with years of control left.  Someone like Chris Sale, when the White Sox traded him for Moncada/Kopech+.  Anything less than an ace is a terrible return.  And I get that Moncada was probably a bad #1 overall prospect, but even if you think Holliday is a bad #1 overall too, you're still undervaluing him to an absurd degree by settling for a reliever with injury concerns, even a shutdown one.
    • So, Burnes is pushed back to Thursday. He could still make the Tuesday-Sunday starts next week, or does Hyde go with Kremer to make two starts next week. The Sunday game against the Yankees could be big. I think if we win two of three we clinch the season series.    
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...