Jump to content

Spenser Watkins 2021


Il BuonO

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

He was a neat story and I'm happy that he had a few good moments but he was never likely to be a long term piece. I think he's earned another start or 2 but I'd be looking to give Mike Baumann his spot for the rest of the season pretty soon. 

I wonder if we will see Baumann in the majors this season.   He only has 3 starts at AAA.   Elias could easily say he needs more time at that level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

I wonder if we will see Baumann in the majors this season.   He only has 3 starts at AAA.   Elias could easily say he needs more time at that level.

Even though he hasn’t done well lately, I would rather see Watkins than Harvey, at least for a couple more starts, but when Zimmermann returns, the clock strikes 12 on Watkins.

more sad face…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have to wonder how Watkins’ 2nd inning would have turned out if we had a real catcher behind the plate. Ya, he’s got to get over Severino’s failure to (once again) block a swinging third strike in the dirt. But gotta think the kid lost a lot of confidence in his backstop and himself when that swing n miss at a knee buckling curve ended up with a runner at first rather than the second out of the inning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watkins' last five starts combined:

25.2 IP, 30 ER, 8 BB, 15 K, .356/.395/.610/1.006 and 10.52 ERA. Probably time to bring Wells up and send him back down. nice little story for a bit, but the clock struck 12 and Watkins is back to being a pumpkin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2021 at 11:44 AM, Philip said:

Even though he hasn’t done well lately, I would rather see Watkins than Harvey, at least for a couple more starts, but when Zimmermann returns, the clock strikes 12 on Watkins.

more sad face…

Doubt we see Zimmermann again this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

Watkins' last five starts combined:

25.2 IP, 30 ER, 8 BB, 15 K, .356/.395/.610/1.006 and 10.52 ERA. Probably time to bring Wells up and send him back down. nice little story for a bit, but the clock struck 12 and Watkins is back to being a pumpkin.

To be fair, one of his starts was delayed two days, which you yourself said probably threw off his routine and, in that start, the umpire blatantly called a strike a ball, which led to a longer inning and runs scoring, And several runs, I think at least four(?) were allowed by the reliever. That doesn’t change your basic point, but it mollifies it just a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...