Jump to content

Tomorrow may be different but tonight the Orioles have the number one draft pick for next year. Yes we caught the Diamondbacks.


Gurgi

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Aglets said:

Another Outfielder?!?!

Great, just what this team needs.  How will we make room for him over Mullins, Kjerstad, Cowser, and Diaz??!?!

Agree thats one strike against Green. We already have a crowded OF.  It would be nice to see a consensus ace pop into the picture. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I don’t know any scouts.   And I don’t doubt at all that right now this guy is looking like the consensus no. 1 pick.   I just feel that a year is a long time and things can change.   We’ve seen that happen numerous times.   

It’s interesting that, as clear a no. 1 as Harper was, he only ranks 4th in that draft in rWAR right now.   Sale, Machado and deGrom are all ahead of him by 5+ rWAR.    It still wouid not be surprising if Harper overtook them, especially the two pitchers, who are older.   So I don’t think anyone would complain that the Harper pick wasn’t a good one.   But I’m rooting for Manny to stay on top of him.  

 

Same! Still love Manny! Agreed, scouts aren’t always right, clearly. Just heard a friend in the scouting biz refer to Green as Harper-esque which means to me the scouting community loves his potential. But you are right, a lot can happen.

I also think, as another poster mentioned, if we are allowed to trade picks, Elias will def do that, no doubt about it lol. TBD with CBA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

I am concerned about a HS bat that only hit .321 as a junior and struck out 34 times in 98 PAs...

 

https://www.maxpreps.com/athlete/elijah-green/ClihPamrH0qYVEcOrMuKSA/baseball/stats.htm

And his OPS was only 1.116.  And he is only an elite runner, and he is only a plus plus arm, and he is only a plus plus power, and is only a plus defender and is only a plus hit.  

Watch him play a little and tell me you dont get a little excited about the possibility he could be an Oriole.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, sevastras said:

And his OPS was only 1.116.  And he is only an elite runner, and he is only a plus plus arm, and he is only a plus plus power, and is only a plus defender and is only a plus hit.  

Watch him play a little and tell me you dont get a little excited about the possibility he could be an Oriole.  

High school stats are pretty funky.   From the link in Big Mac’s post, Green has more runs than hits, how often do you see that, even with a guy who has a high OBP.   Also, he has ten stolen bases in zero attempts!    I guess they just say, “go ahead, take 2B, we know we can’t throw you out anyway!”   Finally, he has a fielding percentage of .875 (3 errors in 24 chances).   That’s uh, low for an outfielder.   

Bottom line, you’d have to see him play, as you said.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

High school stats are pretty funky.   From the link in Big Mac’s post, Green has more runs than hits, how often do you see that, even with a guy who has a high OBP.   Also, he has ten stolen bases in zero attempts!    I guess they just say, “go ahead, take 2B, we know we can’t throw you out anyway!”   Finally, he has a fielding percentage of .875 (3 errors in 24 chances).   That’s uh, low for an outfielder.   

Bottom line, you’d have to see him play, as you said.
 

I agree, as a general matter HS stats are funky.  That being said as a general matter elite talent does not strike out a high rate in HS competition.  I'm sure all the tools are there, but I have a hard time believing the plus hit tool if you struggle to put the ball in play in HS.  It's a red flag for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Big Mac said:

I agree, as a general matter HS stats are funky.  That being said as a general matter elite talent does not strike out a high rate in HS competition.  I'm sure all the tools are there, but I have a hard time believing the plus hit tool if you struggle to put the ball in play in HS.  It's a red flag for sure. 

I do agree that a 34% K rate in high school seems like something you wouldn’t see in a consensus no. 1 pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PG Events: 40

Key Stats: 133 games, .362-9-67 with a 1.097 OPS

 

Short Story: Has a blend of size, speed and power that few prospects in recent memory possess. This goes on both sides of the ball. Everything seems to take steps forward every time we see him, from the usable in-game power to his arm strength. This helps to bet on Green reaching his mountainous ceiling as the development process just keeps trending up to the sky.

 

Big Moment: Green gave us a glimpse of what he is really capable of at the 16U WWBA World Championship when he hit .583-2-11. He combined to produce 20 runs, hit another seven doubles, and even chipped in three stolen bases for good measure. The home runs hit were some of the highlights of the summer regardless of class.

  • Upvote 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...