Jump to content

Rule 5 list


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

Yes, go to Roster Resource (now found on Fangraphs) and in the minor league portion of the list there’s a column that shows when a player will be subject to the Rule 5.   Players eligible this year are marked with a red “R5” (for players previously eligible) or “Dec. ‘21” for the newbies.

https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/depth-charts/orioles

Edit - SG beat me to it.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

It shows Ryan Mountcastle in Baltimore as well as Norfolk.   Looks like they put Mountcastle in Norfolk when they should have put McKenna.

So the 40 man guys in Norfolk are the ones with a slighly different shade of beige background in their name field?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I too am confused. There are 3 things confusing me.

1. R5
2. 0
3. Dec '21

My best guess is R5 means they're already eligible for the Rule 5 draft; 0 means they have no options and will either have to be on the ML team or DFA'd and clear waivers to be kept, and Dec '21 means they'll be eligible for the Rule 5 draft this December, which means they'll have to be on the 40 man this December.

Is all/any of that right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SteveA said:

So "R5" in the "Options or R5 Status" column obviously means they are Rule 5 eligible.

But what does "Dec '21" mean?   That is when the rule 5 draft is.  Are those guys eligible too???   If not, what exactly does Dec 21 mean?

Ah, that would make more sense.  Like I said I was pretty sure that DL Hall needed to be protected.

I'll let SG or Frobby or others chime in to confirm though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Look at Fenter for example. He is listed R5 and he was taken last year. 
 

So to me, R5 is someone who can be selected in the rule 5 because they aren’t protected and are eligible by R5 rules.

So anyone with "R5" or "Dec '21" will have to be protected or we could risk losing him?

That would make the list:

  • Kyle Bradish
  • Felix Bautista
  • Cameron Bishop
  • Malquin Canelo
  • Jean Carmona
  • Ryan Conroy
  • Greg Cullen
  • Brett Cumberland
  • Claudio Custodio
  • Patrick Dorrian
  • Ignacio Feliz
  • Gray Fenter
  • AJ Graffanino
  • Adam Hall
  • DL Hall
  • Brennan Hanifee
  • Chris Hudgins
  • Tyler Joiner
  • Blaine Knight
  • David Lebron
  • Mason McCoy
  • Tim Naughton
  • Robert Neustrom
  • Ofelky Peralta
  • Ryan Ripken
  • Leonardo Rodriguez
  • Ramon Rodriguez
  • Cody Sedlock
  • Kevin Smith
  • Lamar Sparks
  • Adam Stauffer
  • Davis Tavarez
  • Frank Tolentino
  • Terrin Vavra
  • Nick Vespi
  • Ryan Wilson
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

So anyone with "R5" or "Dec '21" will have to be protected or we could risk losing him?

That would make the list:

  • Kyle Bradish
  • Felix Bautista
  • Cameron Bishop
  • Malquin Canelo
  • Jean Carmona
  • Ryan Conroy
  • Greg Cullen
  • Brett Cumberland
  • Claudio Custodio
  • Patrick Dorrian
  • Ignacio Feliz
  • Gray Fenter
  • AJ Graffanino
  • Adam Hall
  • DL Hall
  • Brennan Hanifee
  • Chris Hudgins
  • Tyler Joiner
  • Blaine Knight
  • David Lebron
  • Mason McCoy
  • Tim Naughton
  • Robert Neustrom
  • Ofelky Peralta
  • Ryan Ripken
  • Leonardo Rodriguez
  • Ramon Rodriguez
  • Cody Sedlock
  • Kevin Smith
  • Lamar Sparks
  • Adam Stauffer
  • Davis Tavarez
  • Frank Tolentino
  • Terrin Vavra
  • Nick Vespi
  • Ryan Wilson

Yes that’s how I would read it.  Obviously, most of the names on that list you won’t even think about protecting but there will be some questions like Feliz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • While I agree and find your comment funny, maybe just say something along the line of”Don’t give up on this team” or “Quite being Debbie downers” instead of assuming they are projecting the own misery in their lives. People might take it better if it doesn’t feel like a personal attack. Either way, that win felt good and I HOPE this is finally the turning point going into the playoffs soon. 
    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...