Jump to content

Jones UP!! (Franco DFA)


Yardball85

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Ask who?   Hyde doesn't make roster decisions, so he wouldn't say much if asked, and Elias gave his one press conference for the month a few days ago.

Well the simple answer is, “ask anybody who might actually know and who might actually reply.”

But that takes us back to your first question…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

You do have to wonder if this is Jones' audition to stay on the 40-man. He really has had a poor year in AAA this year.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we have a number several head scratching “re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic” moves like this solely to see which guys get the last few slots on the 40.  Looking forward to when decisions don’t have that “who cares” feeling.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Even with Bannon's hot streak he's still batting .187 for the season at Norfolk. Bannon's been great recently, but I don't have a problem with waiting on him a little longer. 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=bannon000ryl

Wow, NINE homers and a double in his last 32 ABs (.438 BA)! Regardless of how he started out, maybe we don't have to wait on him too much longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NCRaven said:

I expect little from Jones, at this point, he's been awful for the last month and a half.  But, they have to take a look and see what they have so that they can make roster decisions after the season.  Franco was a big disappointment after his 2020 season.  Neither of the guys called up are likely to do much, but we know what Franco is, and isn't.  Frankly, Jones, Gutierrez and Martin could all be gone after this season and I doubt any of them will pull a Yaz on us.

Chances of keeping Franco after this year = 0 %
Chances of keeping Jones after this year = 20 %, but more data would be helpful
Chances of keeping Gutierrez after this year = 10 %

Makes this year's decision easy, doesn't it? The only odd part is that it took Elias so long to get there. I forgot to mention the extra cost of promoting these two for a quarter season, in the range of $500,000; that may be the reason.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With MiLB adding a few weeks to the Minor League season, Norfolk now ends the same time as Baltimore. That wasn’t the case before as there would usually be a few weeks gap. With the additional playing time now, plus the (in my opinion, horrible decision) rule of “only 1 pitcher and 1 fielder” roster “expansion,” we could see a bit more of a rotation as players won’t be in their off season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

Wish I could say I was excited, but Jones has been stone cold for several weeks and I’m not expecting to see much here.  

Sad to admit it, but I'd rather see nothing much from Jones than nothing much from Franco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone than that lazy Franco! Never ran out a ball, Poor fundamentals at third base, didn’t hit for power or average. I rather see a player give a ratsass then Franco. Now to get the other fat lazy player off the roster. Yep that’s you Sevie you human Swiss cheese of a catcher. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...