Jump to content

I'm predicting Hyde will resign soon


GuidoSarducci

Recommended Posts

I don't believe that Elias or ownership hold Hyde responsible for the performance of this team.  The pitchers that have been trotted out this season have been putrid and it hasn't been Hyde's fault.  Mancini, Mullins, and Mountcastle have been the only players consistently in the lineup all season (with the exception of Ryan's concussion) and producing.  I hope that Hyde gets a genuine chance to manage this team with Rodriguez and Hall in the rotation and Rutschman in the lineup.  Who knows, maybe Santander and Hays will be generally healthy and we'll actually have 5 or 6 legitimate hitters in the lineup on a regular basis next year.

Side note that probably belongs in another thread, but, I think it's 50-50 whether Mancini gets traded or extended during the off season.  I doubt that they just let it ride, but I could definitely see them reaching agreement on a three year extension.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not sure the #1 goal was the specific goal but a very high pick was.

This came up because I was questioning why, if Hyde isn't going to be good enough to manage the team when it gets better, it's fine to have him manage the team last year, this year and next year, and a response -- which I thought was serious -- implied that Hyde's just fine when the team's goal is to get the #1 draft choice.

As I've said a bunch of times, and I don't expect much agreement, if Elias's main goal is to have the Orioles win the fewest games in the majors, he should be fired and not work in MLB again. I'm not going to believe that's the case unless the conclusion becomes unavoidable, and I think that's very, very unlikely to happen..

On the other hand, I understand that putting minimal dollars and talent on the major-league club teams for a few years, and getting high draft picks, is part of the Houston plan. But I don't see any inconsistency between that plan and hiring the best manager you can to work with and inspire young players, get to know (and evaluate) the guys who are potential keepers, teach inexperienced big leaguers on a bad team how to want to win and how to dealk with losing, pound some fundamentals into the players, oversee the coaching staff, etc. The result might -- might -- be to win a few more games this year or next than you would under Hyde. To me, that would be just fine, though really beside the point that there should be a long-term benefit from putting a helpful, constructive, innovative, really smart manager -- like a younger version of Joe Maddon -- in place at the outset of a rebuild.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spiritof66 said:

This came up because I was questioning why, if Hyde isn't going to be good enough to manage the team when it gets better, it's fine to have him manage the team last year, this year and next year, and a response -- which I thought was serious -- implied that Hyde's just fine when the team's goal is to get the #1 draft choice.

 

Different teams need different things out of their manager.  A guy that is the best fit in one situation might be a poor fit in another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

To me, Cedric has looked tired & worn out for the past week or so. Hasn't been himself either at the plate or in the field. He's been playing day in / day out for 5 months, and I think it's starting to catch up with him. He might need a few days off to regroup.

The funny thing is, if it's fatigue.. the slump STARTED after a day off.

On Friday August 13 he extended his hitting streak to 20 games.

Hyde gave him Saturday the 14th off.

Since that off day, he is 4 for 36 (.111/.194/.237/.431).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, rm5678 said:

To me, Cedric has looked tired & worn out for the past week or so. Hasn't been himself either at the plate or in the field. He's been playing day in / day out for 5 months, and I think it's starting to catch up with him. He might need a few days off to regroup.

I thought so too, and then he was money last night. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/25/2021 at 10:25 AM, Philip said:

I accept that i shouldn’t have written what I said. However, there are grounds for it. He’s fat which means he’s out of shape. If he were 55+ that might be ok, but he’s only 47, and can reasonably be expected to keep in shape. He doesn’t. Why not? Is that meaningless in a sport where physical condition is so important? Maybe. Does it set a poor example? Maybe. I’m not sure, which is why I accept that it was unnecessary. But it’s still a valid question.

It is entirely possible to list legitimate examples that indicate Hyde is neither a good manager nor a good motivator. Yes he has poor players, and we don’t know how much roster input he has, if any. But how he uses what he has is questionable.

Regarding Maddon, or the shills writing for the team, what are they gonna say? I work with people who are barely competent, but I’ll never publicly say anything bad about them. That’s just basic PR.

Do you think Hyde would be a better manager if he got super fit? Seems like all the team needs is a personal trainer and nutritionist for Hyde. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Do you think Hyde would be a better manager if he got super fit? Seems like all the team needs is a personal trainer and nutritionist for Hyde. 

I didn’t suggest that, I don’t think. I suggested that a better motivator would first motivate himself. A better leader would set an example. I shared my reasons why I don’t think he’s a good manager.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Different teams need different things out of their manager.  A guy that is the best fit in one situation might be a poor fit in another.

I would add that there can be value to continuity -- a team improving with the same manager in place.

But I buy your point that a manager "that is the best fit in one situation might be a poor fit in another." Can someone explain to me what about Hyde makes him a good fit for the current situation, other than what I think facts most of us assume: his willingness to work cheap and to keep his mouth shut about who is and isn't on the 26-man roster?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
    • I like this idea better, but I am curious to what it would take to secure Mason Miller.
    • I totally get it.  It’s a huge risk vs. reward situation, but getting someone like him (if he’s still strong) or Skubal could make a major difference come October for you guys over the next three seasons.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...